[PHP-DEV] RE : [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Starting 5.3

2007-05-14 Thread P
From: Greg Beaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] With all due respect, this is a rather severe exaggeration of PHK's talents. PHK does *not* use a standardized file format like ZIP, and the format is undocumented as of last Friday when I read all of the docs at your site. Right. As for

[PHP-DEV] RE : [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Starting 5.3

2007-05-09 Thread P
From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...and phar is the best candidate I know for this. I'd say the only one NO, there is an alternate PHP package format. It solves every issues you rose about phar (including the direct url access to a virtual file). Its name is PHK and it

[PHP-DEV] RE : [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Starting 5.3

2007-05-09 Thread P
-Original Message- From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I guess we are solving the wrong problem. We have: 1. phar needs script-defined named streams 2. Named streams are prohibited by some config option 3. Let's pretend this stream is not actually what it is 4.

RE: [PHP-DEV] RE : [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Starting 5.3

2007-05-09 Thread Andi Gutmans
PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 4:23 AM To: Stas Malyshev; Stefan Priebsch Cc: internals@lists.php.net Subject: [PHP-DEV] RE : [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Starting 5.3 From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...and phar is the best candidate I know for this. I'd say the only one