Hi all and Ferenc,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Anatol Belski wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: jakub@gmail.com [mailto:jakub@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jakub
>> Zelenka
>> > Exactly, so my question was - why it still needs to do "if (mode == 0)
>> >
Hi Yasuo,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> > No problem. I'll update so that 0 mode is for 7.1.
> > JSON's is better to use larger precision. So this change is
Hi Anatol,
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Anatol Belski
wrote:
> Hi Yasuo,
>
> > > Thanks for the ping. IMHO this is the stuff for 7.1. I actually saw the
> > discussions previously, but was rather thinking you was targeting 7.1 as
> that was
> > already the time of the
Hi Jakub,
> -Original Message-
> From: jakub@gmail.com [mailto:jakub@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jakub
> Zelenka
> > Exactly, so my question was - why it still needs to do "if (mode == 0)
> > ndigit = 17;" in snprintf at the place I've linked? It won't have any
> > effect as zend_dtoa
Hi Yasuo,
> > Thanks for the ping. IMHO this is the stuff for 7.1. I actually saw the
> discussions previously, but was rather thinking you was targeting 7.1 as that
> was
> already the time of the feature freeze.
>
> No problem. I'll update so that 0 mode is for 7.1.
> JSON's is better to use
Sommer Nielsen <ka...@php.net>
>> Cc: Anatoliy Belsky <a...@php.net>; Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com>;
>> internals@lists.php.net
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] More precise float value
>>
>> Hi Anatol and Ferenc,
>>
>> On
Hi all,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> No problem. I'll update so that 0 mode is for 7.1.
> JSON's is better to use larger precision. So this change is targeted
> to 5.6 and 7.0.
>
> Let me know if you have comments on this.
The RFC is updated.
lt;tyr...@gmail.com>;
> internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [DISCUSSION] More precise float value
>
> Hi Anatol and Ferenc,
>
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen <ka...@php.net> wrote:
> > I'm sorry I have not caught this any
Hi Anatol and Ferenc,
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> I'm sorry I have not caught this any earlier, but even without
> consulting with Anatol, I'm not keen on adding this into 7.0, we are
> in RC stage, and I want us to focus on a stable release
Hi Yasuo
2015-09-18 23:28 GMT+02:00 Yasuo Ohgaki :
> It's been 2 weeks and no comment for this.
> I'll start voting.
I'm sorry I have not caught this any earlier, but even without
consulting with Anatol, I'm not keen on adding this into 7.0, we are
in RC stage, and I want us
Hi Yasuo,
- Original Message -
From: "Yasuo Ohgaki"
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015
Hi all,
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
IEEE 754 double cannot express exact float values. That said,
float values expressed by
Hi all,
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> IEEE 754 double cannot express exact float values. That said,
> float values expressed by json/serialize/var_export/echo/print
> are not precise enough in many cases.
>
> Issues:
> - json_encode() uses
12 matches
Mail list logo