On 27.10.2008, at 08:26, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2008/10/27 Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 27.10.2008, at 06:16, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2008/10/26 Johannes Schlüter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:32 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
So, I propose its
On 04.11.2008, at 23:02, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 27.10.2008, at 08:26, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2008/10/27 Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 27.10.2008, at 06:16, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2008/10/26 Johannes Schlüter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:32
Lukas Kahwe Smith escribió:
Also should there be some other way to get STDOUT and STDERR defined
I assume we are talking about userland constants right ?
--
Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two (you can't have all three).
Cristian Rodríguez R.
Platform/OpenSUSE - Core Services
SUSE LINUX
2008/11/5 Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 04.11.2008, at 23:02, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 27.10.2008, at 08:26, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2008/10/27 Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 27.10.2008, at 06:16, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2008/10/26 Johannes Schlüter [EMAIL
2008/11/5 Cristian Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lukas Kahwe Smith escribió:
Also should there be some other way to get STDOUT and STDERR defined
I assume we are talking about userland constants right ?
Yes, userland constants defined with define().
--
Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two
On 27.10.2008, at 06:16, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2008/10/26 Johannes Schlüter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:32 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
So, I propose its either being a supported feature, or simply
put an
deprecation notice on it (5.3) and remove it HEAD. I
2008/10/27 Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 27.10.2008, at 06:16, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
2008/10/26 Johannes Schlüter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:32 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
So, I propose its either being a supported feature, or simply put an
At any rate I am very sure I never stumbled over code defining a
constant with a ressource.
I did stumble over such thing ;)
Not a very good idea to support ressources,
especially given the obvious WTF's this causes (as you rightly pointed
out).
Gday internals
Today I felt over a topic while looking at some documentation bugs,
and as the title says its the Resource constants. From what I could
understand by asking Felipe and reading over some bug reports and such
then resource constants aren't really supported. I had a play around
with
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:32 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
So, I propose its either being a supported feature, or simply put an
deprecation notice on it (5.3) and remove it HEAD. I personally vote
for the last option, as I don't think resources should be constants as
they do not have the
2008/10/26 Johannes Schlüter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 14:32 +0100, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
So, I propose its either being a supported feature, or simply put an
deprecation notice on it (5.3) and remove it HEAD. I personally vote
for the last option, as I don't think
11 matches
Mail list logo
