Marcus Boerger wrote:
to be honest, what is wrong with svn for you? Do you branch off your own
PHP? No, so what's wrong? To easy to use for 99.99% of people using PHP
repository? But please (everyone) just think of it and don't comment
anymore.
As I said previously, my personal opinion has
Travis Swicegood wrote:
On a slightly related note, would anyone else be interested in seeing a
Git repository along side Subversion? Even if people can't commit to
the Git repo, I'd be happy to help set it up with the ability for them
to push changes back to the SVN repo once they've
Hello Edward,
to be honest, what is wrong with svn for you? Do you branch off your own
PHP? No, so what's wrong? To easy to use for 99.99% of people using PHP
repository? But please (everyone) just think of it and don't comment
anymore.
The decision has been made we are going for SVN and
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 20:25 -0400, Gwynne Raskind wrote:
Yes, I read that. But the conversion of the repository itself is
only half the battle. There are a bunch of scripts in CVSROOT that
need to be ported over to SVN somehow.
My plan was to work on those next.
not only CVSROOT,
Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at the
point where it might actually have some benefit to us, do we have some
volunteers who have some time to try converting over the repository and
all the post-commit and ACL rules from CVSROOT?
Talking to people here at
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:05 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at
the point where it might actually have some benefit to us, do we
have some volunteers who have some time to try converting over the
repository and all the post-commit and
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at the
point where it might actually have some benefit to us, do we have some
volunteers who have some time to try converting over the repository and all
Gwynne Raskind wrote:
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:05 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at
the point where it might actually have some benefit to us, do we have
some volunteers who have some time to try converting over the
repository and all
On Jul 24, 2008, at 8:23 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at
the point where it might actually have some benefit to us, do we
have
some volunteers who have some time to try converting over the
repository and all the post-commit and
: Thursday, July 24, 2008 5:06 PM
To: PHP Developers Mailing List
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Volunteers for Subversion 1.5 conversion of
cvs.php.net?
Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at
the
point where it might actually have some benefit to us, do we have some
volunteers
I've done a bunch of stuff with svn commit hooks and am willing to
lend a hand.
-lucas (mobile)
On Jul 24, 2008, at 17:06, Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that Subversion 1.5 has been out for a little while and it is at
the point where it might actually have some benefit to
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd love to see this conversion. Let's make sure we get enough folks to
volunteer to check the history of our source trees although we should in
any case keep the CVS one around for browsing just in case...
Is this
If it's not happening in the next month, I'd be happy to help. I did
the SimpleTest CVS to SVN conversion in about 5 minutes (including
waiting on the history to be converted). I've also worked with the hook
scripts and such in SVN so I might be able to help out there if someone
else doesn't
On Jul 24, 2008, at 10:14 PM, Sean Coates wrote:
Do we have a preference of Apache's SVN or svnserve?
The former requires Apache 2+, AFAIK.
I'd like to kick this discussion over to the svn-migration@ list;
there are a lot of points to consider in this question and internals@
has enough
14 matches
Mail list logo
