Hi,
been busy again at work, sorry for the late answer.
I can look into setting up a cruise-control-like infrastructure on our
dev-machines that'll run these periodically.
Thanks for the offer, that would be very helpful. Is it possible to
have it for windows as well? It could also help if
What would rock is to have it supported by gcov (by us or
somewhere else with a public report), would it be possible?
How can I get this done?
I'm adding Nuno to the loop, he is the one leading the gcov initiative
and will surely explain the setup in a better way than me :)
I can add it,
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Brian Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
You need it? Please help me to maintain and to provide reliable
binaries for windows
This statements makes it sound like extensions that do not build on Windows
should be removed.
That sounds insane to
Hi,
Can be moved PECL
- interbase
- fpdf
- fbsql
- sybase and sybase_ct
Sybase can be moved, it is unmaintained. I would've done this long ago if I
could, karma-wise.
Sybase_ct works perfectly for us at 11 and despite feature requests that
exist and me not having put big efforts into it
Pierre Joye wrote:
Can be moved PECL
- interbase
- fpdf
- fbsql
- sybase and sybase_ct
Please let me know if you can either help to maintain an extension or
if you see any issue with one of these moves.
i can help with fpdf if needed but it should go to PECL
nonetheless ...
--
Hartmut
hi Timm,
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Timm Friebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can be moved PECL
- interbase
- fpdf
- fbsql
- sybase and sybase_ct
Sybase can be moved, it is unmaintained. I would've done this long ago if I
could, karma-wise.
Let see what other thinks about this
Hi,
But if we work together, it should be possible to keep them. Let me
ask you the same than I ask to Lester, will you help us to keep
sybase_ct in php-src? You don't need to know C or php internals but to
actually provide tests and run them when we update the libraries or
releases RC.
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Timm Friebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if we work together, it should be possible to keep them. Let me
ask you the same than I ask to Lester, will you help us to keep
sybase_ct in php-src? You don't need to know C or php internals but to
actually provide
/ Un*x: Get a .tar.gz,
unpack, phpize, configure and make (last time I tried that didn't
work for
me, must've been some wrong auto-whatever).
If the release is done correctly, a simple pecl install sybase works.
This is an important point because unfortunately in the past a moved
to
Philip Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti:
/ Un*x: Get a .tar.gz,
unpack, phpize, configure and make (last time I tried that didn't
work for
me, must've been some wrong auto-whatever).
If the release is done correctly, a simple pecl install sybase works.
And on a related note, have we
Pierre Joye wrote:
You need it? Please help me to maintain and to provide reliable
binaries for windows
This statements makes it sound like extensions that do not build on
Windows should be removed. That sounds insane to me. Please elaborate.
I must not understand what you are trying to
On 12.06.2008, at 16:31, Pierre Joye wrote:
- interbase
- fbsql
- sybase and sybase_ct
I think moving fbsql is quite reasonable. However interbase and sybase
I do not agree with.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12.06.2008, at 16:31, Pierre Joye wrote:
- interbase
- fbsql
- sybase and sybase_ct
I think moving fbsql is quite reasonable. However interbase and sybase I do
not agree with.
Who will maintain them? Who can
On 14.06.2008, at 16:24, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12.06.2008, at 16:31, Pierre Joye wrote:
- interbase
- fbsql
- sybase and sybase_ct
I think moving fbsql is quite reasonable. However interbase and
sybase I do
Hi Lukas,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These extension seem widely used enough that we have to make it an effort to
support them.
If it is so widely used, why noone complains about this removal? Why
there is nobody taking care of the bugs or
Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Lukas,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These extension seem widely used enough that we have to make it an effort to
support them.
If it is so widely used, why noone complains about this removal? Why
there is nobody taking
Hi Pierre,
Like I said on IRC, if the ext end up being broken, but remain in core
they can get fixed and made available easily to all users. If we move
them, then this is no longer possible. We can revist this topic for
PHP6, but I do not think we should start dropping these extension in
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
- interbase
- fbsql
- sybase and sybase_ct
I think moving fbsql is quite reasonable. However interbase and
sybase I do
not agree with.
Who will maintain them? Who can we ask when there is issues (besides
the obvious ones)?
These extension seem widely used enough
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Lukas,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
These extension seem widely used enough that we have to make it an effort
to
support them.
If it is so
Hi Lester,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apart from the problems created by changes made to the interbase driver in
the 5.1 and early 5.2 cycle ( the 64 bit version of which STILL has not been
repaired :( ) the driver still works fine with modern
Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Lester,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apart from the problems created by changes made to the interbase driver in
the 5.1 and early 5.2 cycle ( the 64 bit version of which STILL has not been
repaired :( ) the driver still works
Lester, hi,
I even installed a
development build of PHP6 some time ago, but if there is going to be TWO
versions of PHP6 then to be honest I am not interested.
There haven't been for the last couple of weeks. We're just waiting for
Scott to finish with the Engine work so that we can commit
Steph Fox wrote:
As far as I'm aware there's nothing in PHP 6 that can't be supported
from PHP 5.2.1 up, but there's plenty in PHP 5.3 that a lot of
developers will like.
AND SHOULD BE BEING DEVELOPED IN PHP6 SO WE CAN AT LEAST GET A CLEAN UNICODE
STABLE SYSTEM AVAILABLE TODAY !!
--
Hi Lester,
Am Samstag, den 14.06.2008, 21:13 +0100 schrieb Lester Caine:
[...]
AND SHOULD BE BEING DEVELOPED IN PHP6 SO WE CAN AT LEAST GET A CLEAN UNICODE
STABLE SYSTEM AVAILABLE TODAY !!
Please, don't yell. KTHXBYE
cu, Lars
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter
As far as I'm aware there's nothing in PHP 6 that can't be supported from
PHP 5.2.1 up, but there's plenty in PHP 5.3 that a lot of developers will
like.
AND SHOULD BE BEING DEVELOPED IN PHP6 SO WE CAN AT LEAST GET A CLEAN
UNICODE STABLE SYSTEM AVAILABLE TODAY !!
Please don't shout,
Pierre Joye wrote:
What I'm asking you is to help me to actually have a controllable and
testable firebird drivers in PHP. I will do my best to help you to get
things fixed and to provide the best windows binaries. However, one
thing is sure, I can't do it alone. For two reasons, I'm not a
hi Lester,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm asking you is to help me to actually have a controllable and
testable firebird drivers in PHP. I will do my best to help you to get
things fixed and to provide the best windows binaries. However, one
On 14.06.2008, at 22:32, Lester Caine wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
What I'm asking you is to help me to actually have a controllable and
testable firebird drivers in PHP. I will do my best to help you to
get
things fixed and to provide the best windows binaries. However, one
thing is sure, I
2008/6/14 Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Lukas,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
These extension seem widely used enough that we have to make it an effort
to
support them.
If it is so widely used, why noone
Hi,
While reviewing the different extensions for the windows build, I
found that many are unmaintained without any commit since year(s).
Other are already removed from HEAD and some may be continued to
live in core but it would require some love.
* Extension being deleted (not removed, a cvs
Pierre Joye wrote:
- smnp
nice ext, any ISP out there willing to help? I can help for the windows
support
Hmm, we use this. Is it broken for 5.3 or something? What do we need
to do to keep this alive?
--
Brian Moon
Senior Developer/Engineer
--
When you
Hi Brian,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Brian Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
- smnp
nice ext, any ISP out there willing to help? I can help for the windows
support
Hmm, we use this. Is it broken for 5.3 or something? What do we need to do
to keep this alive?
It
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 16:31 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
* Extension being deleted (not removed, a cvs rm will be done)
mhash, no impact as we provide a compatibility layer via ext/hash
(Thanks to Scott)
We should keep this somewhere in Siberia like we did with other
extensions we
hi,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Johannes Schlüter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 16:31 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
* Extension being deleted (not removed, a cvs rm will be done)
mhash, no impact as we provide a compatibility layer via ext/hash
(Thanks to Scott)
We
34 matches
Mail list logo
