Guys,
what's the verdict on this one? Right now, many already have
if(function_exists('get_magic_quotes_gpc') get_magic_quotes_gpc())
in their code.
Now with the latest 5.3, that throws an E_STRICT!
Seriously, is that necessary?
David
Am 05.02.2008 um 21:23 schrieb Pierre Joye:
Hi,
Hi David,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:52 PM, David Zülke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
what's the verdict on this one? Right now, many already have
if(function_exists('get_magic_quotes_gpc') get_magic_quotes_gpc())
in their code.
Now with the latest 5.3, that throws an E_STRICT!
Am 27.02.2008 um 17:03 schrieb Pierre Joye:
Hi David,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:52 PM, David Zülke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Guys,
what's the verdict on this one? Right now, many already have
if(function_exists('get_magic_quotes_gpc') get_magic_quotes_gpc())
in their code.
Now with the
Hi David,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:19 PM, David Zülke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, but IIRC, Andi or someone else suggested that there should be
a warning in 5.3, but that was not discussed further.
Because adding a waring in 5.x is a no-no.
I mean, really, what's the point? I have
Hello David,
telling us what we already know.
I am not quite sure, that all developers, for example the junior one, know
that.
Am 27.02.2008 um 17:25 schrieb Lokrain:
Hello David,
telling us what we already know.
I am not quite sure, that all developers, for example the junior
one, know
that.
You mean my code should break because some ignorant noob is unaware
that PHP6, which is still months or years away,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 5:48 PM, David Zülke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean my code should break because some ignorant noob is unaware
that PHP6, which is still months or years away, will throw out magic
quotes?
How a E_DEPRECATED will break your code? Please, I doubt there is a
need to
-1. Keep the query functions and return FALSE. No need to unnecessarily
break b/c for scripts that were just trying to do the right thing by coping
with both possibilities. It's just one more roadblock to PHP 6 adoption.
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 10:42 -0600, Brian Moon wrote:
Richard Quadling wrote:
Aren't some things just worth the BC break?
Having never used them, I can quite happily say bomb the bastards!
Agreed. For Phorum will just change our code from:
if ( get_magic_quotes_gpc() ) {
to:
if
Richard Quadling wrote:
Aren't some things just worth the BC break?
Having never used them, I can quite happily say bomb the bastards!
Agreed. For Phorum will just change our code from:
if ( get_magic_quotes_gpc() ) {
to:
if ( function_exists(get_magic_quotes_gpc) get_magic_quotes_gpc()
On Feb 8, 2008 1:26 PM, Tomas Kuliavas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I guess I'm -1: Restore them, always return false, and throw
E_DEPRECATED.
But this was about them being in PHP 6, not PHP 5..
If magic_quotes_* is gone, so should anything else even remotely related
to them be gone.
So I guess I'm -1: Restore them, always return false, and throw
E_DEPRECATED.
But this was about them being in PHP 6, not PHP 5..
If magic_quotes_* is gone, so should anything else even remotely related
to them be gone. You have to fix your code anyway for it to work in PHP
6 (or even 5)
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 23:32 -0600, Larry Garfield wrote:
On Thursday 07 February 2008, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 07.02.2008, at 00:59, Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Andi,
On Feb 7, 2008 12:56 AM, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1
Suggestion to enhance the suggestion: return
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 13:48 +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 1:26 PM, Tomas Kuliavas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I guess I'm -1: Restore them, always return false, and throw
E_DEPRECATED.
But this was about them being in PHP 6, not PHP 5..
If magic_quotes_* is gone, so
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 14:26 +0200, Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
So I guess I'm -1: Restore them, always return false, and throw
E_DEPRECATED.
But this was about them being in PHP 6, not PHP 5..
If magic_quotes_* is gone, so should anything else even remotely related
to them be gone. You have
Hi!
On Feb 8, 2008 2:31 PM, Sam Barrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I say throw them out. Magic quotes are easy to simulate 100%.
I could cry by reading this sentence ;)
--
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
On 08/02/2008, Pierre Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008 1:26 PM, Tomas Kuliavas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I guess I'm -1: Restore them, always return false, and throw
E_DEPRECATED.
But this was about them being in PHP 6, not PHP 5..
If magic_quotes_* is gone, so should
On 07.02.2008, at 00:59, Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Andi,
On Feb 7, 2008 12:56 AM, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1
Suggestion to enhance the suggestion: return false + emit E_STRICT
message (but I am also fine with pure return false if people don't
like
this suggestion).
Sounds
On Thursday 07 February 2008, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 07.02.2008, at 00:59, Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Andi,
On Feb 7, 2008 12:56 AM, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1
Suggestion to enhance the suggestion: return false + emit E_STRICT
message (but I am also fine with pure
On Thursday 07 February 2008, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 07.02.2008, at 00:59, Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi Andi,
On Feb 7, 2008 12:56 AM, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1
Suggestion to enhance the suggestion: return false + emit E_STRICT
message (but I am also fine with pure
On Feb 6, 2008 2:13 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 3:26 PM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 3:23 PM, Pierre Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Mike Willbanks wrote:
I know they've been marked deprecated and all, but, really, what's
the cost/penalty to having a couple functions around for legacy apps?
Then we will continue to be at the same old issue of they exist, people will
continue to use them and never
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Pierre Joye wrote:
There is not really a need to discuss the removal again, that's why I
ask for a simple vote:
+1: remove them (as it is now in HEAD)
-1: Restore them and always return FALSE (not 0)
0: I don't care, do what you wish, I never use them anyway
I don't
-1
Pierre Joye schreef:
Hi,
It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
functions in HEAD/php6 but returning always FALSE. I thought the
decision was already done but I rather prefer to ask the list a second
time and be done with this topic (and be free to bogus any other
-1
On Feb 5, 2008 10:23 PM, Pierre Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
functions in HEAD/php6 but returning always FALSE. I thought the
decision was already done but I rather prefer to ask the list a second
time and be done
+1 - remove the functions
To make a script compatible one has to add
function get_magic_quotes_gpc(){return 0;}
in one of his library files.
I think the current change is somewhat similar to PHP_INI_ALL in PHP -
PHP_INI_PERDIR for magic_quotes_gpc made in 4.2.3. It also could lead to
breakage
On 5 Feb 2008, at 20:23, Pierre Joye wrote:
There is not really a need to discuss the removal again, that's why I
ask for a simple vote:
+1
--
Geoffrey Sneddon
http://gsnedders.com/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Markus Fischer wrote:
+1
I didn't realized it until I read Rasmus' mail. In this case, -1 to not break
BC.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi,
+1: remove them (as it is now in HEAD)
-1: Restore them and always return FALSE (not 0)
0: I don't care, do what you wish, I never use them anyway
-1
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
2008/2/6, Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't care that much, but I think it would matter if the functions
just are there and return false (so -1).
for set_magic_quotes_runtime(), if true is passed, it should still
throw a fatal error, if false is passed it should not (or actually 1
On Feb 6, 2008 9:20 PM, Cristian Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/2/6, Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't care that much, but I think it would matter if the functions
just are there and return false (so -1).
for set_magic_quotes_runtime(), if true is passed, it should still
internals
Subject: [PHP-DEV] get_magic_quotes_gpc, get-magic-quotes-runtime in
head, get a final decision
Hi,
It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
functions in HEAD/php6 but returning always FALSE. I thought the
decision was already done but I rather prefer to ask
Hi Andi,
On Feb 7, 2008 12:56 AM, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1
Suggestion to enhance the suggestion: return false + emit E_STRICT
message (but I am also fine with pure return false if people don't like
this suggestion).
Sounds reasonable too. It would be nice to add a deprecate
I'm going to rock the boat again I guess...
Suggestion to enhance the suggestion: return false + emit E_STRICT
message (but I am also fine with pure return false if people don't like
this suggestion).
Sounds reasonable too. It would be nice to add a deprecate notice in
5.3.x as well.
Hi,
It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
functions in HEAD/php6 but returning always FALSE. I thought the
decision was already done but I rather prefer to ask the list a second
time and be done with this topic (and be free to bogus any other bug
reports about this
On Feb 5, 2008 3:23 PM, Pierre Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
functions in HEAD/php6 but returning always FALSE.
Personally
+1
--
/Dan
Daniel P. Brown
Senior Unix Geek
? while(1) { $me = $mind--;
On Feb 5, 2008 9:23 PM, Pierre Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1: remove them (as it is now in HEAD)
-1: Restore them and always return FALSE (not 0)
0: I don't care, do what you wish, I never use them anyway
-1 (restore them) :)
-Hannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
I agree +1
Regards
Marco
+1
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Feb 5, 2008 3:26 PM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 3:23 PM, Pierre Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
functions in HEAD/php6 but returning always FALSE.
Personally
XX
VOTE
Pierre Joye wrote:
Hi,
It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
functions in HEAD/php6 but returning always FALSE. I thought the
decision was already done but I rather prefer to ask the list a second
time and be done with this topic (and be free to bogus any other bug
+1
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tue, February 5, 2008 2:38 pm, Jeremy Privett wrote:
-1: Restore them and always return FALSE (not 0)
I freely admit to not remembering a 2-year-old discussion, but it
seems to me for BC reasons you'd want to do this...
I know they've been marked deprecated and all, but, really, what's
the
I know they've been marked deprecated and all, but, really, what's
the cost/penalty to having a couple functions around for legacy apps?
Then we will continue to be at the same old issue of they exist, people will
continue to use them and never move away from them.
Mike
2008/2/5, Pierre Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
It seems that there is voice
+1: remove them (as it is now in HEAD)
Remove them , they are of no use.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Feb 5, 2008 5:46 PM, Mike Willbanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know they've been marked deprecated and all, but, really, what's
the cost/penalty to having a couple functions around for legacy apps?
Then we will continue to be at the same old issue of they exist, people will
continue
On Feb 6, 2008 1:01 AM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 5:46 PM, Mike Willbanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know they've been marked deprecated and all, but, really, what's
the cost/penalty to having a couple functions around for legacy apps?
Then we will
But this has been discussed to death. Please say +1/-1/0 =)
Pierre: Sorry, I didn't want to add to the noise, but for the sake of
completeness I'll give you my 0.
- Steph
--
Pierre
http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 3:26 PM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 3:23 PM, Pierre Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC related
functions in HEAD/php6 but returning always FALSE.
Personally
XX
Hi Rasmus,
On Feb 6, 2008 2:13 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 3:26 PM, Daniel Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 3:23 PM, Pierre Joye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It seems that there is voices in favor of keeping the GPC
50 matches
Mail list logo
