On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
because it's impossible to discuss anything on internals without the
noise coming from outside..? Could we finally make this list
read-only for every one but the @php.net people? I get enough spam
already, spam from this list is not
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 10:00 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
To to get back to the point of the noise on the lists - it's getting out
of hand, and I am afraid that if we don't solve this any time soon, the
lists will be useless for any sort of decent discussion and promoting
even more secret
On 13-Dec-07, at 8:08 AM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 10:00 +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
To to get back to the point of the noise on the lists - it's
getting out
of hand, and I am afraid that if we don't solve this any time soon,
the
lists will be useless for any sort of
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 08:55 -0500, Marco Tabini wrote:
I am just a lurker, so take this with the due grain of salt, but
simply making internals@ read-only is just going to drive people to
contact the core team members directly (thus likely *increasing* your
blood pressure :-)). I think
Jani, if your blood pressure raises when reading normal people's
messages because your dictatorial mind cannot stand the opinion of
people that you regard inferior to yourself, my suggestion would be to
either go see a shrink or quit this open source project.
Here's hoping you will be able
Nice to hear some work is done but I get very annoyed every time I see
the words behind the scenes (or something alike). I guess it was
because it's impossible to discuss anything on internals without the
noise coming from outside..? Could we finally make this list read-only
for every one but the
Surely the noise coming from outside are people's valid opinions? I mean
it's the people making the noise who have to live with decisions made on
the internals list, on a daily basis, and for most there income depends
on it.
It's not just php you're discussing, it's thousands of developers
Hello Nathan,
if their income depends on it, hmm, I wonder, why the hell are they only
complaining? The amount of people being constructive and not actual
developers with a php.net account is close to zero. That is what Jani had in
mind. We have always been open and we have always gladly given
On 12/12/2007, Nathan Rixham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if their income depends on it, hmm, I wonder, why the hell are they
only complaining?
point well made
always been open and we have always gladly given account to
people who contributed.
and it's been well noticed, not to mention
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 22:33 -0600, Gregory Beaver wrote:
Any brackets adds another set of shift/reduce to the parser, regardless
of how the syntax of the language is defined.
That's not all with that syntax.
?php
{
class foo { }
}
?
Leads to a delayed declaration which is done at
Jani Taskinen wrote:
Nice to hear some work is done but I get very annoyed every time I see
the words behind the scenes (or something alike). I guess it was
because it's impossible to discuss anything on internals without the
noise coming from outside..? Could we finally make this list
Nice to hear some work is done but I get very annoyed every time I see
the words behind the scenes (or something alike). I guess it was
It is much more efficient to communicate in person (preferably
physically, but can be phone, IM, chat, etc.) than to write
semi-anonymous mails to public
hello!
Jani Taskinen wrote:
Nice to hear some work is done but I get very annoyed every time I see
the words behind the scenes (or something alike). I guess it was
because it's impossible to discuss anything on internals without the
noise coming from outside..? Could we finally make this list
Hi,
I've been furiously working behind the scenes with Stas and Dmitry, and
have some enhancements to namespaces in the form of 2 patches.
1) multiple namespaces per file
2) use ::name;
1) multiple namespaces per file
This is implemented as such:
?php
namespace one;
use Blah::A;
// code
On Dec 11, 2007 6:42 PM, David Coallier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 6:13 PM, Gregory Beaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been furiously working behind the scenes with Stas and Dmitry, and
have some enhancements to namespaces in the form of 2 patches.
1) multiple
Is this patch going to be implemented in the PHP release?
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 18:42 -0500, David Coallier wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 6:13 PM, Gregory Beaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been furiously working behind the scenes with Stas and Dmitry, and
have some enhancements to
16 matches
Mail list logo
