Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
I finished testing now, the new test case 27large_object_oid.phpt
tests for the new parameters. The test passes with PostgreSQL 8.4
but fails with older versions as i haven't found a good way to
test for the new capabilities in the skip test.
i'm now testing by
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
I think it should return errors in the case. The intention for the
PostgreSQL API is, avoiding automatic oid assigning by
PostgreSQL. This is necessary for query based replication tools such
as pgpool. Plus, if PostgreSQL fails to assign the specified oid, the
transaction
Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
i've started looking into the patch yesterday, there are still some
small issues with it though ... i'll provide you with more detailed
comments later today or early tomorrow ...
open questions:
- should the functions return an error if using the specified oid
Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
i've started looking into the patch yesterday, there are still some
small issues with it though ... i'll provide you with more detailed
comments later today or early tomorrow ...
open questions:
- should the functions return an error if using the
Hello Tatsuo-san
Can anybody review my patches? I need to commit the patches and want
to work on 5.3 and 6.0.
i've started looking into the patch yesterday, there are still some
small issues with it though ... i'll provide you with more detailed
comments later today or early tomorrow ...
Can anybody review my patches? I need to commit the patches and want
to work on 5.3 and 6.0.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
Sorry for delay. Here is the revised patches.
I marged pg_lo_import_with_oid() into pg_lo_import().
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
On 17.04.2008 18:50,
Sorry for delay. Here is the revised patches.
I marged pg_lo_import_with_oid() into pg_lo_import().
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
On 17.04.2008 18:50, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
Here are the patches against 5.2 HEAD.
First of all, please use `diff -u`, not just `diff` - unified diffs
Hello Tatsuo,
I never saw an update on this patch, is there any? Also did you ever
apply for an account? Please do the following:
1) Change your patch with Tony's comment in mind (don't add lo_import_with_oid)
2) Resend the updated patch in unified format (diff -u)
3) Provide tests
4) Apply
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Marcus Boerger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Tatsuo,
I never saw an update on this patch, is there any? Also did you ever
apply for an account? Please do the following:
1) Change your patch with Tony's comment in mind (don't add
lo_import_with_oid)
2)
On 17.04.2008 18:50, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
Here are the patches against 5.2 HEAD.
First of all, please use `diff -u`, not just `diff` - unified diffs are much
more readable.
Ok. I'll do it next time.
Modified API's are:
1) pg_lo_create now accepts an optional parameter (large object
10 matches
Mail list logo