On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:50 PM, François Laupretre franc...@php.net
wrote:
HI Dmitry,
Question : in which scope do you evaluate the PHP expression ?
We don't evaluate expressions. We just store them. Evaluation and/or
modification is a subject for future development.
Example :
HI Dmitry,
Question : in which scope do you evaluate the PHP expression ?
Example :
DbC.requires($a 0);
DbC.ensures(__RETURN__ 0);
function foo($a)
{
...
How can you know from this that the first expression must be evaluated at
function entry, that the second one must be interpreted when
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com
mailto:rowan.coll...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any value in deciding the initial syntax for 7.0, and
implementing only non-parameterised annotations, i.e. you can call
hasAnnotation(string): bool but nothing else?
this will work, of course, and robust implementation wouldn't take more
than a day :)
but it'll require user-level parser again. no big advantage in comparison
to doc-block.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com
wrote:
Nikita Popov wrote on
this won't implement features necessary for phpDocumentor, Doctrine, etc.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com
mailto:rowan.coll...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any value in
Dmitry Stogov wrote on 16/02/2015 18:41:
this won't implement features necessary for phpDocumentor, Doctrine, etc.
I know.
Like I say, it's just a way of keeping things moving, rather than saying
eh, maybe next year.
It allows us to formally agree the feature, the roadmap, the basic
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
this won't implement features necessary for phpDocumentor, Doctrine, etc.
Just be careful here with phpDocumentor, it does not use annotations but
really needs docblocks instead.
Today the overlap between it and doctrine and
Hi Dmitry,
In my mind, annotation syntax was one level lower, dealing with strings of
unknown syntax, not PHP expressions. Something like :
'*' whitespaces '@' STRING free-string-up-to-eol
This supports :
* @requires $a 0
But also :
* @statement INSERT INTO ?? VALUES (13, 'Phoenix', 'AZ',
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:45 AM, François Laupretre franc...@php.net
wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
In my mind, annotation syntax was one level lower, dealing with strings of
unknown syntax, not PHP expressions. Something like :
'*' whitespaces '@' STRING free-string-up-to-eol
This supports :
*
you already have doc-block. nothing should be done in PHP core, but you
have to parse it yourself.
The goal of annotations is to provide standard and powerful way.
On the other hand standard PHP expression syntax may be not enough for all
cases.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:22 PM,
On 16/02/15 12:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
you already have doc-block. nothing should be done in PHP core, but
you have to parse it yourself.
The goal of annotations is to provide standard and powerful way.
On the other hand standard PHP expression syntax may be not enough for
all cases.
yes. like it was proposed at
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reflection_doccomment_annotations#list_of_methods_to_implement
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Cesar Rodas ce...@rodas.me wrote:
On 16/02/15 12:32, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
you already have doc-block. nothing should be done
12 matches
Mail list logo
