Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
What I am probably asking is what was the brick wall PHP6 hit. I was
under the impression that there was no agreement on 'switchable or only'
to unicode core? ( And those who did write PHP6 books seemed to have
their own views on which way the discussions would go
Hello, people. I am looking for community feedback about my
ideas for XML binding persistence library:
XML binding persistence library
Description: object-oriented library for mapping XML file
structure, binding to PHP 5 class. Library would provide
functionality for using XML based entity
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
'3' is not a very processor friendly number, so working with 4 even though
wasteful on memory, does make perfect sense. How long is it since we had a
640k limit on working memory? SERVERS should have a good amount of memory
On 16.03.2010, at 10:46, John wrote:
Hello, people. I am looking for community feedback about my
ideas for XML binding persistence library:
skip…
Are you thinking about implementing it as some kind of extension? or about
php-code?
or just reusable C-library with bindings for PHP?
--
PHP
dreamcat four wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
'3' is not a very processor friendly number, so working with 4 even though
wasteful on memory, does make perfect sense. How long is it since we had a
640k limit on working memory? SERVERS should have a
Hi all
I recently needed seek functionality in arrays, and couldn't find it in the
regular set of array functions, so I wrote a function for it. (Seek = getting
an array value based on the position (or offset, if you want to call it like
that), and not the key of the item)
Basically you can
hi Felix,
Not sure about the usefulness of this function but the name is
misleading (pls reattach the patch as .txt while being at it :). Does
it set the position (_seek) or does it return the value of a given
position (_get_pos)? or both (no idea :)?
Cheers,
Cheers,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at
Hi Pierre
Right now, it returns the value of a given position. In that case,
array_get_pos might be a better name. Oh, and I attached the patch with .txt
extension :)
Greetings,
Felix
Index: ext/standard/array.c
===
---
On 16 March 2010 13:30, Felix De Vliegher felix.devlieg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I recently needed seek functionality in arrays, and couldn't find it in the
regular set of array functions, so I wrote a function for it. (Seek = getting
an array value based on the position (or offset, if
On 2010-03-13, Lukas Kahwe Smith m...@pooteeweet.org wrote:
+1
As for the exact features to merge, lets first start with formulating a plan
about what we want to see in the next release. I also think it makes sense to
base the number and scope if the features on a rough idea of when we want
Felix De Vliegher wrote:
Hi all
I recently needed seek functionality in arrays, and couldn't find it
in the regular set of array functions, so I wrote a function for it.
Seek = getting an array value based on the position (or offset, if you
want to call it like that), and not the key of the
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 16:45, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
derick Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:45:24 +
Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=296284
Log:
- Moved the Unicode experiment from trunk to its own branch for reference.
Hello,
I've just renamed the 5.4 branch to THE_5_4_THAT_ISNT_5_4 and moved
trunk to the branch FIRST_UNICODE_IMPLEMENTATION.
The next things to do is to re-create trunk from PHP 5.3; I've hold off
that for now, but I'd like to do the following soon:
- Declare 5.2 security fixes only
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
Right now, it returns the value of a given position. In that case,
array_get_pos might be a better name. Oh, and I attached the patch
with .txt extension :)
Does it also seek the array pointer? Because I think array_seek that
moves the pointer,
On 2010-03-16, Derick Rethans der...@derickrethans.nl wrote:
- Declare 5.2 security fixes only (Something for Ilia to declare).
- Declare 5.3 bug fixes only (and ini-mini features if so desired)
(Something for Johannes to declare).
Once that's done, I'd like to:
- Recreate trunk from the
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Christian Schneider
cschn...@cschneid.com wrote
I thinks the user space implementation
function array_seek($array, $pos)
{
$a = array_values($array);
return $a[$pos];
}
is simple enough to not add a native function for this.
It might not be
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Derick Rethans der...@derickrethans.nl
wrote:
Right now, there are the following features that I can see we should
think about:
- the new output buffering mechanism (I can not really see why we would
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 17:10, David Soria Parra s...@gmx.net wrote:
On 2010-03-16, Derick Rethans der...@derickrethans.nl wrote:
- Declare 5.2 security fixes only (Something for Ilia to declare).
- Declare 5.3 bug fixes only (and ini-mini features if so desired)
(Something for Johannes to
On 16-mrt-2010, at 17:07, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
Right now, it returns the value of a given position. In that case,
array_get_pos might be a better name. Oh, and I attached the patch
with .txt extension :)
Does it also seek the array
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
On 16-mrt-2010, at 17:07, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
Right now, it returns the value of a given position. In that case,
array_get_pos might be a better name. Oh, and I attached the patch
with
Am 16.03.2010 16:58, schrieb Derick Rethans:
I've just renamed the 5.4 branch to THE_5_4_THAT_ISNT_5_4 and moved
trunk to the branch FIRST_UNICODE_IMPLEMENTATION.
Why do we need THE_5_4_THAT_ISNT_5_4 and trunk? trunk should be where
the development happens. When the time comes for a release,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Sebastian Bergmann
s...@sebastian-bergmann.de wrote:
Am 16.03.2010 16:58, schrieb Derick Rethans:
I've just renamed the 5.4 branch to THE_5_4_THAT_ISNT_5_4 and moved
trunk to the branch FIRST_UNICODE_IMPLEMENTATION.
Why do we need THE_5_4_THAT_ISNT_5_4
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:48 AM, dreamcat four dreamc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
'3' is not a very processor friendly number, so working with 4 even though
wasteful on memory, does make perfect sense. How long is it since we had
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Derick Rethans der...@php.net wrote:
I was also thinking, can we just make this work just like fseek (with a
whence parameter) as well? (http://uk3.php.net/fseek)
Hi,
not sure how SEEK_END is supposed to work with arrays but here is
SEEK_SET and SEEK_CUR (with
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 17:54, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Sebastian Bergmann
s...@sebastian-bergmann.de wrote:
Am 16.03.2010 16:58, schrieb Derick Rethans:
I've just renamed the 5.4 branch to THE_5_4_THAT_ISNT_5_4 and moved
trunk to the branch
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 16:58, Derick Rethans der...@derickrethans.nl wrote:
Before we add features, they need to be discussed whether we want to
have them.
Does that mean you want to take up a
- strict RFC-and-after-3months-discussion-before-commit policy
(i.e. killing the
dreamcat four wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:48 AM, dreamcat four dreamc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
'3' is not a very processor friendly number, so working with 4 even though
wasteful on memory, does make perfect sense. How
On 03/16/2010 10:40 AM, dreamcat four wrote:
As for text files on disk, if they are unicode, they are most commonly
utf-8 too. So then, why use utf-16 as internal unicode representation
in Php? It doesn't really make a lot of sense for most regular people
who want to use Php for their web
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On 03/16/2010 10:40 AM, dreamcat four wrote:
As for text files on disk, if they are unicode, they are most commonly
utf-8 too. So then, why use utf-16 as internal unicode representation
in Php? It doesn't really make a lot of sense for most regular people
who want to use
Hi!
On disk storage should probably be UTF-8 without any question? Windows
use of widestrings for some files simple doubles up the on disk storage
As file content, it's OK (an it'd be easy to add option to specify
content transformation if we wanted), but prescribing filenames as UTF-8
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
On 03/16/2010 10:40 AM, dreamcat four wrote:
As for text files on disk, if they are unicode, they are most commonly
utf-8 too. So then, why use utf-16 as internal unicode representation
in Php? It doesn't really make a
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
Well, the obvious original reason is that ICU uses UTF-16 internally and
the logic was that we would be going in and out of ICU to do all the
various Unicode operations many more times than we would be interfacing
with
On 03/16/2010 12:05 PM, dreamcat four wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
On 03/16/2010 10:40 AM, dreamcat four wrote:
As for text files on disk, if they are unicode, they are most commonly
utf-8 too. So then, why use utf-16 as internal unicode
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 19:11 +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
+ merge php-fpm branch?
If we get a trunk which will be released in a foreseeable timeframe we
don't need to merge this to 5.3 anymore, which had been an old plan.
Tony, do you agree?
johannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Stanislav Malyshev s...@zend.com wrote:
Hi!
On disk storage should probably be UTF-8 without any question? Windows
use of widestrings for some files simple doubles up the on disk storage
As file content, it's OK (an it'd be easy to add option to specify
On 03/16/2010 11:00 PM, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 19:11 +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
+ merge php-fpm branch?
If we get a trunk which will be released in a foreseeable timeframe we
don't need to merge this to 5.3 anymore, which had been an old plan.
Tony, do you
Hi!
Does that mean you want to take up a
- strict RFC-and-after-3months-discussion-before-commit policy
(i.e. killing the scratching-an-itch spirit of PHP)
- I'm going to commit this patch tomorrow mail to internals@
(i.e. killing I need this functionality, maybe others do to spirit
Hi!
Right now, it returns the value of a given position.
How it's different from:
array_slice() returns the sequence of elements from the array array as
specified by the offset and length parameters?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
s...@zend.com http://www.zend.com/
Right now, it returns the value of a given position.
How it's different from:
array_slice() returns the sequence of elements from the array array as
specified by the offset and length parameters?
array_slice returns an array of elements. This function would return the
value at the given
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On 03/16/2010 12:05 PM, dreamcat four wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Rasmus Lerdorfras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
On 03/16/2010 10:40 AM, dreamcat four wrote:
As for text files on disk, if they are unicode, they are most commonly
utf-8 too. So then, why use utf-16
On 3/16/2010 6:48 AM, dreamcat four wrote:
Sure UTF-16 can make sense. But only if your external representations
are also in UTF-16. So whats the default Unicode settings for MYSQL,
POSTGRE, etc? Well, are they always set to UTF-8, or UTF-16?
This is a very good point. The PHP project
And remember,
Its not just the number of times its send to ICU for conversion. Its
also the number of times your UTF-16 string has to be converted back
into utf-8 afterwards. This is why Apple makes its utf-16 strings
immutable. So they are read-only, and the utf-8 representation can be
cached
On 16.03.2010, at 19:23, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 16:58, Derick Rethans der...@derickrethans.nl wrote:
Before we add features, they need to be discussed whether we want to
have them.
Does that mean you want to take up a
- strict
On 16.03.2010, at 16:58, Derick Rethans wrote:
Before we add features, they need to be discussed whether we want to
have them. As version name for it I would like to use trunk-dev (and
not 5.4-dev or 6.0-dev) as we're not quite sure where this is moving.
Right now, there are the following
On 16.03.2010, at 16:58, Derick Rethans wrote:
I've just renamed the 5.4 branch to THE_5_4_THAT_ISNT_5_4 and moved
Eventually it should be deleted, if it helps at all in merging the OB change
then it should be kept until that happens, otherwise it can be deleted now
imho. The new 5.3 based
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:15:37AM -0400, Wez Furlong wrote:
I'm sure that the docs team will add this to the manual if you ask them
politely.
Specifically, PDO_SQLITE defaults to a 60 second busy timeout. This can
be changed by setting PDO::ATTR_TIMEOUT. The value is specified in
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:43 PM, dreamcat four dreamc...@gmail.com wrote:
And remember,
Its not just the number of times its send to ICU for conversion. Its
also the number of times your UTF-16 string has to be converted back
into utf-8 afterwards. This is why Apple makes its utf-16 strings
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 22:13 +0100, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 16.03.2010, at 16:58, Derick Rethans wrote:
Before we add features, they need to be discussed whether we want to
have them. As version name for it I would like to use trunk-dev (and
not 5.4-dev or 6.0-dev) as we're not quite
-Original Message-
From: Felix De Vliegher [mailto:felix.devlieg...@gmail.com]
Sent: 16 March 2010 13:31
To: PHP internals
Subject: [PHP-DEV] array_seek function
Hi all
I recently needed seek functionality in arrays, and couldn't
find it in the regular set of array
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 17:12, Mikko Koppanen mkoppa...@php.net wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Christian Schneider
cschn...@cschneid.com wrote
I thinks the user space implementation
function array_seek($array, $pos)
{
$a = array_values($array);
return $a[$pos];
}
Hi
As SEEK_END only makes sense with zero or negative offsets (for arrays anyway),
I've come up with an implementation for SEEK_END:
http://phpbenelux.eu/array_seek.patch.txt
So you can do:
$arr = array('a', 'b', 'c', 'd');
echo array_seek($arr, -2, SEEK_END); // outputs 'b'
echo
51 matches
Mail list logo
