On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Dmitry Stogov dmi...@zend.com wrote:
Hi,
1) I didn't get why do we need fprintf(Loaded/Unloaded extension). It'll
break all the tests in DEBUG mode
Great catch
2) zend_error() may work through SAPI handler (e.g. for FastCGI sapi it
may try to send error
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
Beta3 has been taggued with curl wrappers, and with the new
CURL_WRAPPERS_ENABLED constant :-p
Do we all agree to remove that feature (meaning
Hi Internals,
PHP 5.5.0 Beta 3 has been released for testing. It fixes some bugs against
beta 2.
You'll find details in the NEWS file.
The packages can be found at:
http://downloads.php.net/dsp
and windows packages at
http://windows.php.net/qa
Please test the release carefully and report
Thanks for all your hard work Julien / David.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
Hi Internals,
PHP 5.5.0 Beta 3 has been released for testing. It fixes some bugs against
beta 2.
You'll find details in the NEWS file.
The packages can be found at:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
Beta3 has been taggued with curl wrappers, and with the new
Hey;
I think it's a great idea, if all op_arrays in one script share the same
literals table, let's say it's main scope 's literals table.
then we can make all class entry, function entry share the same constant
literal..
image that, same class(function) only need to lookup once in one
Hi Julien
2013/4/11 Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net:
Ok, too bad we taggued beta3 with it. I suggest we remove this feature when
going RC so.
Huge +1
--
regards,
Kalle Sommer Nielsen
ka...@php.net
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
It is not entirely clear how the function treats subclasses. Does it
count
only the *direct* instances of a class, or does it also count the
instances
of subclasses?
class A {}
class B extends A {}
echo get_objects_count('A');
// 0
$a = new B;
echo $a instanceof A;
// 1 (true)
If you decide to remove it for 5.5 RC, tell me and I'll merge this branch
https://github.com/adoy/php-src/tree/remove-curl-wrappers
Thanks
Pierrick
On 11 April 2013 04:03, Julien Pauli jpa...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr
Just a curious question – would it be possible to add some code
directly to upstream, so you wouldn't have to engulf
yet-another-library into PHP source tree?
It's always a security nightmare to have various copies of libraries
at various places of the system.
Ondrej
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:44
Good morning/afternoon/evening list
I have created a patch to the libxml/DOM extensions to expose the functionality
for creating
default/fixed values from the XSD schema when validating a document. I have
created a PR on
GitHub which can be viewed here: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/325
Hi!
Just a curious question – would it be possible to add some code
directly to upstream, so you wouldn't have to engulf
yet-another-library into PHP source tree?
It's always a security nightmare to have various copies of libraries
at various places of the system.
Not sure about what
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org wrote:
Just a curious question – would it be possible to add some code
directly to upstream, so you wouldn't have to engulf
yet-another-library into PHP source tree?
It is a bit of work to support php's stream upstream. I wanted to
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Pierrick Charron pierr...@adoy.net wrote:
If you decide to remove it for 5.5 RC, tell me and I'll merge this branch
https://github.com/adoy/php-src/tree/remove-curl-wrappers
s,5.5,all branches,
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime
Including 5.3 and 5.4 ??
Pierrick
On 11 April 2013 14:12, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Pierrick Charron pierr...@adoy.net
wrote:
If you decide to remove it for 5.5 RC, tell me and I'll merge this branch
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Pierrick Charron pierr...@adoy.net wrote:
Including 5.3 and 5.4 ??
Yes, why should we have it there? Either it is stable and ready or it
is not (as it is now).
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe,
Speaking as a userspace developer and site admin, I'd be fine with
trading a more expensive compilation for a runtime improvement. Even a
100% increase in compilation time would pay for itself over only a dozen
or so requests (assuming the runtime improvements are non-trivial, too).
I don't think this is a safe optimization. In the following case it would
output 'b' and not 'a' which is the correct result:
a.php:
?php
define('FOO', 'a');
include('b.php');
?
b.php:
?php
define('FOO', 'b');
echo FOO;
?
It is certainly not likely for a constant to be defined twice but PHP
Hi
2013/4/12 Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Pierrick Charron pierr...@adoy.net wrote:
Including 5.3 and 5.4 ??
If removed in 5.3 and 5.4, theres no need for the constant anymore.
--
regards,
Kalle Sommer Nielsen
ka...@php.net
--
PHP Internals - PHP
19 matches
Mail list logo