On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 20:40 -0400, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
After some conversations with Rasmus on IRC i've come up with the
following patch:
http://ilia.ws/patch/curl.txt
I this the latest patch and all agree t it? Or were there further
improvements?
Could somebody of you please commit it
On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 01:37 +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
I haven't wasted time on finding out wtf these ini entries actually
do, or even asked philip or gwynne to fix the inglés.. but if there is
even a remote chance it'll make it into 5.3.0 I'll do whatever it
takes to make it
Alright,
I mentioned it in the last mails a bit in different ways so to make it
clear:
I'm aiming at re-tagging and packaging 5.3.0 to get these things in:
- Andrei's calloc fix
- Rasmus's/Ilia's curl fix
- Improvements to the UPGRADING file (everybody)
If possible (and I think it is)
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 20:52 -0400, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Last week or so there was a fairly detailed discussion on the
internals list regarding type hinting based on my original patch.
Since then the patch has been revised to address the major concerns
that were identified (breakage of
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 19:28 +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
So I'm happy for anybody interested to look over my work and help me to
become
better:
http://github.com/thkoch2001/gearman-php-worker/tree/master
You are wrapping every call inside PHP_EMBED_START_BLOCK/_END_BLOCK
calls. By this
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 18:20 -0500, Greg Beaver wrote:
I'd like to consider instead using svn:externals to pull in PEAR stuff
directly from a STABLE branch from somewhere in the pear/ hierarchy.
This would allow us over at PEAR to push the installation phars into
that branch at the same time a
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 15:00 -0400, Gwynne Raskind wrote:
And I'm happy to announce that this is now fixed; creation of tags is
now allowed. This comes alongside a bit of an overhaul of the entire
set of hook scripts. See http://news.php.net/php.cvs/59765 if you're
desperately curious :).
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 16:14 -0500, Greg Beaver wrote:
I think it would be better to make the release process like this, with
5.3.1RC1 as an example:
(1) svn copy http://svn.php.net/repository/php/php-src/branches/PHP_5_3
http://svn.php.net/repository/php/php-src/branches/php_5_3_1RC1
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 00:08 -0300, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
What do you think about the possibility to support ArrayObject
instances in array_* functions?
If you all agreed on this, I can definately help to complete the
patch, but I need some initial guidance to finish at least the first
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:42 -0300, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
I'm trying to avoid a globally solution on first instance to avoid a
great impact on language.
If you wanna ask me what's the global solution, I'll suggest a
Collection like implementation for all array functions.
Define all array
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 01:20 -0400, Eddie Drapkin wrote:
There's a script, mod_files.sh, in ext/session for creating directory
tree with depth X for sessions. As it stands, it's pretty poorly
documented and very basic. I got exceptionally bored and rewrote most
of it, the patch is
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 23:18 +0300, Vesselin Kenashkov wrote:
Hello everyone,
I tried to create a page in the wiki but I dont see the create button. I
have an account but I guess I still lack permissions. Anyway here is my
proposal:
You should be able to edit the RC list, add a new link
Hi,
following Ilia's notice I want to give a heads-up for 5.3.1 RC1, too. We
have quite many fixes in SVN and the packaging script was successful in
my test.
I want to try to keep it along the same schedule as Ilia with 5.2 so we
can keep commit limitations - in case we need them - as limited
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 14:05 +0400, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
We can also just export them... Which symbols are they?
Probably it make sense for the future release. php6?
I think it's quite useful to export timelib as time manipulation is
quite often needed.
In the past we sometimes added new
Hi,
1) please don't abuse another thread for something completely unrelated,
that makes tracking things really hard.
2) Most of you want should be doable with 5.3's anonymous
functions/closures.
3) More than that isn't really planned at the moment.
johannes
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 12:46 +0300,
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 19:12 +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
My goal will be to provides both solutions (libmysql and mysqlnd) to be
able to quickly switch from one to the other (for tests / benchmark)
Like others said I'd go with different static builds - it's not like PHP
would take ages to
Hi,
even if no known extension uses it I won't remove it in 5.3 as it is a
break of ABI compatibility.
For 6 I assume one might remove it, especially as it doesn't know about
IS_UNICODE.
johannes
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 08:24 +0200, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
Hi list,
Apparently, function
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 20:06 -0300, Themis Vassiliadis wrote:
I'am making some experiments on Symbian for Nokia mobile and I'am looking
for some basically PHP distribution that can be compiled in.
Nokia has a site about that:
http://wiki.opensource.nokia.com/projects/PAMP
Other than that i
Hi,
I thought I sent the warning out on thursday but can't find it in my
internals folder therefore the notice:
We certainly should get 5.3.1 rolling and therefore I'm planning RC1
on Tuesday evening European time
I'm not t used to subversion therefore I'd like some comments about
this
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 11:23 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote:
I don't understand why you are merging things back and forth like that.
Just keep it simple:
PHP_5_3 is open for any commits, php_5_3_1 is only for commits you pick
into it. And only do manual merge. Otherwise you won't be merging
Hi,
thanks for your suggestions, some comments below:
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 14:09 +0200, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
2) Tuesday: Change the version
$ vi branches/php_5_3_1/main/php_version.h etc.
3) making the branch a tag
$ svn mv branches/php_5_3_1 tags/php_5_3_1
I would suggest a
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 11:12 +0200, Aron Szabo wrote:
Hello!
Is it possible to replace an existing PHP function ( like mail() ) in an
extension.
Look for the implementation of disable_functions.
(zend_disable_function() in zend_API.c)
johannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime
Hi,
a new tool provides new opportunities and challenges, with the move to
svn I took some of the new possibilities and after many discussions
created a new release process which I'll try for 5.3.1 for which RC1 is
about to be packed. (having trouble accessing the snaps box to build
it...)
The
, please test this
RC against your code base and report any problems that you encounter.
Johannes Schlüter
PHP 5.3 Release Master
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 15:21 +0200, Samuel ROZE wrote:
I wanted to change a parameter in my PDO class, with the fourth
PDO::_construct arg. But, I've many projects, which uses PDO, with one
new PDO per project. The problem is that I have to change the source
of every projects...
Why
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 15:55 +0200, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
yeah .. its certainly a valid question.
we have stuff like lastInsertId(), which depending on the driver
either gets the current value of a sequence or the last id generated
for the connection.
so going by that example
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 23:51 +0200, Samuel ROZE wrote:
There is a patch to implements this function into PDO:
http://www.d-sites.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/php-5_3-pdo-notices-managment.patch
Just a quick note: This changes the ABI so it can't be done in 5.3.
johannes
--
PHP
.
two weeks from now. To make this possible, please test this RC against
your code base and report any problems that you encounter.
Johannes Schlüter
PHP 5.3 Release Master
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
sorry the subject should have been PHP 5.3.1RC3 Testing, it's RC3 not
2. Sorry.
The rest of the mail is correct though:
johannes
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 20:15 +0100, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
The third release candidate of 5.3.1 was just released for testing
and can be downloaded here
to roll the final
using the same code base either Thursday next week or the week after. To
make this possible, please test this RC against your code base and
report any problems that you encounter.
Johannes Schlüter
PHP 5.3 Release Master
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 10:18 +0100, Davide Romanini wrote:
My php version:
PHP 5.2.8 (cli) (built: Dec 17 2008 00:54:27)
Please use a recent version of PHP.
Copyright (c) 1997-2008 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2008 Zend Technologies
with Zend Extension
other bugs have been fixed
so this additional RC is needed. Depending on feedback I hope to be able
to roll the final using the same code base Thursday next week. To
make this possible, please test this RC against your code base and
report any problems that you encounter.
Johannes Schlüter
PHP 5.3
at
http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.php#5.3.1.
Johannes Schlüter
PHP 5.3 Release Manager
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
at
http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-5.php#5.3.1.
Johannes Schlüter
PHP 5.3 Release Manager
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 19:02 +0530, Arvind Srinivasan wrote:
(1) If the number of occurrences of the API to be modified are
relatively small, then make the change directly.
e.g.
-int fcgi_accept_request(fcgi_request *req);
-int fcgi_finish_request(fcgi_request *req, int force_close);
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 18:53 +0100, Samuel ROZE wrote:
Hello,
I want to use two stream functions (stream_array_to_fd_set and
stream_array_from_fd_set) in a module (/etc/modulename/modulename.c). To
use them, i included the streamsfuncs.h file, with:
stream_array_from_fd_set is declared
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:53 +0300, Antony Dovgal wrote:
Hello all.
I'm glad to announce that we now have FPM SAPI available for testing in a
separate SVN branch.
You can check out its sources using the following command:
svn co
Hi,
so, 5.3.1 out just a few weeks but due to the merge-based process and
some delays in there the changelog for 5.3 is already quite long and so
I'd like to restart the release process there soon.
My current plan has one RC this week, one more before Christmas, maybe
Tue 22nd, then a Christmas
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:21 -0500, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
It was not, and we did not forget it because of the automatic TODOs in
the wiki (it shows all commits in a list with their states,
http://wiki.php.net/todo/php531/log) :-).
BS, I reminded Johannes about that patch right before the
Hi,
I know little aobut FPM but:
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:55 +0100, Jérôme Loyet wrote:
We already discussed pros/cons of the two solutions. But why don't we
allow several syntaxes ? And let the end user to choose the better one
for its need ?
No. Several syntaxes makes testing harder, is
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 22:54 +0100, Florian Anderiasch wrote:
--- ext/json/json.c.orig2009-12-09 22:15:33.0 +0100
+++ ext/json/json.c 2009-12-09 22:48:04.0 +0100
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#define PHP_JSON_HEX_APOS (12)
#define PHP_JSON_HEX_QUOT (13)
#define
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 18:31 -0200, Guilherme Blanco wrote:
Yes, but stream_resolve_include_path() works only for files and also
it's PHP6 only. =(
Should be quite simple to merge to other branches if anybody really
cares. Doesn't look like anybody cared from the time 5.3 came up until
at least
On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 01:42 +0100, Johannes Mueller wrote:
if($foo instanceof bar){
..
}
// runs without any notification
instanceof is a language construct expecting a class identifier.
It doesn't complain about on-existing classes as it would need to
trigger the __autoloader which might be
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 14:56 +0100, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I would like to learn more about how the interpreter works, but I was
unable to find good documents on the web. Basically I am thinking on
something about allocation of variables, how does object creation work
and such stuff.
that you encounter.
Johannes Schlüter
PHP 5.3 Release Master
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 04:40 -0800, Michael Shadle wrote:
NOTE: I just remembered there -is- a config-file-scan-dir option at
compile time. However, what about doing away with this and making it
inline in php.ini, the syntax can match mysql, as it uses ini files as
well.
I think the
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 19:15 +, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
iliaaWed, 30 Dec 2009 19:15:11 +
Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=292823
Log:
Fixed bug #44827 (define() allows :: in constant names).
Bug:
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 12:20 +, Derick Rethans wrote:
Hmm, I don't actually think many people test whether parsing parameters
failed, but they do test the return value. AFAIK, our standard is to
return NULL for parameter parsing failures (at least that's what all the
examples in
Hi,
the file ext/intl/tests/rb_build.php will be removed by svnclean as it
matches the *.php pattern from ext/intl/tests/'s ignore. Is there a way
to change the svn ignore pattern to work-around this or can the file be
renamed/moved?
johannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 14:48 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Hello,
At Debian we are planning to include PHP 5.3 in Squeeze, the next stable
release. As such, I would like to know for example when we could expect
5.3.2 and 5.3.3 to be released.
I hope that the new release branch
Raphael,
I went over your patches from
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/php5/5.3.1-2 and did quick
reviews (didn't apply / test them or anything ...)
Here some comments:
004-ldap_fix.patch:
Do you have a test for this? when does it happen that ldap_value is
NULL happen? - If that's
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 12:31 +0100, Michael Wallner wrote:
On 01/19/2010 01:27 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
I wrote a small patch that enables this kind of syntax in PHP:
foo()();
I think that becomes hard to read quite easily.
I'd rather see two other things that are
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 13:51 +, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
php.net distributes programs that violate the PHP license: e. g. PHPUnit
or PHPDocumentor (see http://pecl.php.net). If php.net is ok with
ignoring the license terms (and has been for several years), does the
license still mean sh!t?
Hi Andi,
I'd like such a syntax enhancement.
These should be the results from the last time the issue was discussed:
http://devzone.zend.com/node/view/id/1474#Heading7
If I remember correct the main issues stated against it were
- it's to perlish
- Without keyword it's hard to find the
Hi Jim,
you're searching for runkit ;-)
http://de.php.net/manual/en/ref.runkit.php
johannes
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 10:18 -0600, Jim Wilson wrote:
Dear PHP Internals subscribers,
I have two quick questions regarding PHP 5's Reflection API (I apologize if
this isn't the right list to ask):
Hi,
I'd also like to completely remove get_magic_quotes_gpc() and similar
functions instead of having them resulting in a fatal error. The effect
would be the same - the script terminates - but function_exists() is
much nicer as check than version_compare().
Any objections?
johannes
On Fri,
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 23:16 +0100, Richard Quadling wrote:
Also a clear understanding of exactly what MS compiler must be used.
Will the free MS VC++ 2005 Express Edition be suitable?
Quoting the documentation:
| Since PHP 5 the free Microsoft .NET toolchain is also supported (you
| need
Hi Lukas,
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 16:37 +0200, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
4. safe_mode/open_basedir
1. remove safe mode and throw E_CORE_ERROR when set
2. unbundle safe_mode_exec_dir from safe_mode and keep it
(rasmus) (take a look at this patch too)
3. new ini
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 17:52 +0200, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
No.
Dmitry removed it on 2006/03/16 10:33:23 but Zeev reverted that change
on 2006/06/05 13:58:52.
I didn't find the discussion but I remember there was some When did we
decide on that? posting from Zeev.
Ah I'm sorry, reading
Hi,
casts to string happen in quite different places in the engine. For
different reasons we can't assure that an exception throw in these
situations would be handled correctly by the engine. This won't change
until great parts of the engine are rewritten.
Please check the archives - there were
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 14:29 +0300, Tomas Kuliavas wrote:
I think you are confusing PHP features with MySQL features. By running
'SET NAMES' query you set client, connection and result character sets in
MySQL (see http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/charset.html). It is not
related to PHP.
Hello Unknown,
you are wrong, the name is right please learn your lessons before
writing to internals.
To the original problem: Ilia committed a fix a few hours ago which
should fix the problem. Feel free to test a current snapshot.
johannes
On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 11:34 -0700, Unknown W.
Hi Marcus,
for making HEAD the main development branch we should try to reduce the
number of failing tests. Running run-tests.php -n currently still shows
42 tests failing on my current setup. As long as that many tests fail
it's hard to see if a patch breaks anything in there. I recently spent
Hi Rangel,
for PHP 6 the basic string type ist unicode string and most functions
will accept these as primary type. But there are a few exceptions where
unicode, for different reason, makes no sense. There you have to pass a
binary string - an example is the mentioned urlencode(): It has to work
Hi,
yes, the notice is expected. You either have to cast to a binary string
or by setting the stream's encoding using stream_encode() since we can't
guess which encoding you're going to use for a stream.
johannes
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 05:38 -0700, Nikhil Gupta wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing some PHPT
Hi Jani,
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 16:53 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote:
During Derick's talk about PHP 6 at PHP Vikinger, I started to wonder
what exactly was the reasoning behind adding something like
unicode.semantics option. Derick didn't remember, neither did I.
The reason was to keep BC
Hi Jani,
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 16:53 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote:
During Derick's talk about PHP 6 at PHP Vikinger, I started to wonder
what exactly was the reasoning behind adding something like
unicode.semantics option. Derick didn't remember, neither did I.
The reason was to keep BC
Hi,
I don't really know that windows stuff but did you try building PHP
using Edins zip.zip file or your own libxml2? Maybe the libs have some
compatibility issues.
And about the other question: All XML extensions in PHP 5 are based on
libxml2. If you disable building libxml2 support you can't
Hi muquaddim,
before calling these API functions you have to initialise some data
structures. The usual way to embed PHP into another environment is to
provide an SAPI module which wraps PHP's APIs to something you can use
from another system in a nice way.
See php-src/sapi/embed/ for a quite
Hi again,
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 18:12 -0400, muquaddim wrote:
I think the configure option --disable-zts will work on the following
lines.
#ifdef ZTS
#define TSRMLS_D void ***tsrm_ls
#define TSRMLS_DC , TSRMLS_D
#define TSRMLS_C tsrm_ls
#define TSRMLS_CC , TSRMLS_C
#else
#define
Hi Jordan,
next to the book, which is a good reading there are some lsides from
Marcus at talks.somabo.de (look for Code Camp or something like that)
which give an introduction, but well, slides are always made for being
explained during a talk :-)
johannes
On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 13:53 -0400,
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 22:47 -0500, Richard Lynch wrote:
On Fri, June 29, 2007 3:25 am, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
The thing which I don't understand is: why do people want backward
compatibility that much?
Because if you run a webhost with a zillion users, half of whom are
screaming for PHP
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 16:28 +0200, Stefan Priebsch wrote:
Pierre schrieb:
Namespace is one _very_ important reason. If we need a marketing
I agree. But AFAIK namespaces were not supposed to be in PHP6, at least
not in PHP 6.0. Is there an official position on wether namespaces will
be in
+1
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 16:32 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
Ladies, Gentlemen, Kings and Princesses,
With the nice PHP 5 / PHP 6 unicode semantics thread under way I am
trying to gauge what people feel about dropping support for PHP 4 at the
end of this year. That does not mean that we
Hi,
On Sat, 2007-07-07 at 11:00 +0300, Vesselin Kenashkov wrote:
I can not find the specific message...
But googling I found this:
http://www.nexen.net/chiffres_cles/phpversion/php_stats_evolution_for_november_2006.php
So as of november 2006 the php5 adoption was slightly above 12%. Having
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 15:33 -0700, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Fixing unicode=on does not remove the IS_STRING/IS_UNICODE duality. We
still have two kinds of data - unstructured bit stream and structured
text.
But we still have the mess that most internal structures (function
tables,
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 19:38 -0700, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Btw, I don't know how many of you have actually tried to port PHP 5 apps
to PHP 6 but it's quite a disaster. We made some fixes in the past 2-3
weeks and its getting better but it still requires a lot of work. If we
don't make this easy
Hi Boris,
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 15:38 +0200, Boris wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to create an object-oriented PHP 5 extension. As I don't know
any step-by-step tutorial which would explain everything in detail I'm
trying to understand various sources and documents I happen to run into.
Hi,
recently I had the problem that we disable the mail() function if
configure can't find the sendmail binary. Is there any real reason for
this? I can image a few situations where the binary is in a non-standard
location or PHP is compiled on a different host than used.
I'd like to commit the
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 00:49 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote:
So what happens when sendmail really does not exist?
The same as if you configure sendmail_oath wrong or move you binary to a
host where it is missing: mail() returns false.
johannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
Hi
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 01:13 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
I know this is possible, and I believe it is possible in Apache too
with some kind of hack?
But this still doesn't solve a lot of problems, but will generate a
lot more with portable code. Take a bulletin board for example, there
are a
Hi Lukas,
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 08:48 +0200, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
can you gives us a clarification on the question on if ctype will infact
be deprecated in PHP6?
ctype is not UTF-16 aware and therefore won't work with PHP 6 unicode
strings. Instead of ctype there are functions offered by
Hi Zeev,
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 01:58 -0700, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Regarding the unicode on/off modes, I don't think you put yourself in
the developer's view at all. Users are not going to be better of having
to deal with both modes.
Well, I tend to agree with you that they shouldn't have to
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 21:55 +0200, troels knak-nielsen wrote:
On 7/18/07, David Duong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since there isn't any comments on this, should I have posted this
elsewhere? or is it just that no one is interested?
It could be interesting to know, if the reason why this
Hi David,
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 13:09 -0400, David Coallier wrote:
After a bit of discussion with Jani, I came to realize that keeping
the wrapper macro for php_rand, php_srand is plain useless. Yes some
pecl extensions do rely on them (and for those who do, I also provided
a patch [3]). We
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 15:46 -0500, Richard Lynch wrote:
ustuff typed in unicode to allow creation of Unicode strings in PHP5
seems like a Good Idea to this naive reader, if it's easy enough to
code that.
No, we can't introduce a unicode string type in PHP 5.
johannes
--
PHP Internals - PHP
Hi Will,
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 13:57 -0500, Will Fitch wrote:
Thanks, Marcus. I finally found this documentation on PECL by using Google
site:pecl.php.net.
I appreciate the insight.
it's also part of the PHP Source distribution and CVS:
Hi Etienne,
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 22:27 +0200, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
Hello,
Currently, those are allowed:
new $classname;
classname::$methodname();
but those aren't:
$classname::foo();
$classname::CONST;
$classname::$member;
Here is a patch for head that fixes those
David,
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:57 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
Hi internals,
so based on a discussion of php.pecl we thought about using the php_getopt
for the PHP_FUNCTION(getopt) instead of the system provided getopt. Here
is the patch for that. Hopefully someone is reviewing and
way we should do that - I've seen to many people doing too crazy
stuff...
Of course that's not high priority...
johannes
--Jani
Johannes Schlüter kirjoitti:
David,
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 09:57 -0400, David Soria Parra wrote:
Hi internals,
so based on a discussion of php.pecl we
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:02 -0700, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
David has a point here. So first of all we should move getopt
implementation out of CLI/CGI and into main. Could you do that
first Jani?
Why one would need getopt outside of cgi/cli? I.e. where would these
options come from?
Hi,
I think we reached the consensus to rename namespaces to packages as our
implementation is more package-like. Therefore I wrote the corresponding
patch which tries to get rid of all namespaces and ns (well, not all
ns only the namespace-related ones of course) used in the code.
Additionally I
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 09:33 +0400, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
At least, I have one additional namespace related patch, that is not
accepted yet.
Renaming may require a lot of additional work with it.
Well, in my experience it's simpler to do such renaming inside an patch
(then it's a simple
Hi Andi,
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 09:13 -0700, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Yeah and we reviewed the patch and saw it was good.
Thanks for the feedback, such information is always appreciated :-)
I think what's missing here is that to the best of my knowledge Ilia
reached out off list to revert the
Hi Tijnema,
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 20:27 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
On 8/10/07, Johannes Schlüter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I think we reached the consensus to rename namespaces to packages as our
implementation is more package-like. Therefore I wrote the corresponding
patch which tries
Hi again,
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 20:50 +0200, Tijnema wrote:
Well, why does PHP compiles fine without the patch?, and why is this
file in the snapshot package when it is generated from flex?
Since snaps are for users, CVS versions (and patches) are for developers
and we expect developers to
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 21:27 +0200, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
I have flex 2.5.33 installed btw, that's fine right?
Yes, check the output of configure for details why it wasn't found.
Bah, I hate numbers. We need flex 2.5.4, not 2.5.33. 2.5.33 won't work
with the engine's skeleton file
Hi,
I've updated the patch to be compatible with Dmitry's latest changes:
http://schlueters.de/~johannes/php/zend_namespace_to_package_20070817.diff
johannes
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 11:26 +0200, Johannes Schlüter wrote:
Hi,
I think we reached the consensus to rename namespaces to packages
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 10:43 -0700, Tony Bibbs wrote:
Having watched this thread intently for the past few weeks, we seem to
be simply tripping over the semantics of it all, right?
Thinking a bit outside the box, how hard would it be to simply use
both names, one as an alias of the other? In
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 08:31 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
How much work do people think *IS* involved in porting a large application
over to PHP6? Reading between the lines it looks like we are talking file
conversion to UTF-16 + what? What is currently a show stopper to simply
running a PHP5
201 - 300 of 1214 matches
Mail list logo
