would this trigger a notice if $foo is not defined?
if yes, then it would be different from the current behavior of the
ternary operator.
Couldn't believe it, thus I tested it myself
snip
Don't know, what you are talking about, but the notice _is_ the current
behaiour and therefore:
Am 25.08.2012 18:38, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
would this trigger a notice if $foo is not defined?
if yes, then it would be different from the current behavior of the
ternary operator.
Couldn't believe it, thus I tested it myself
snip
Don't know, what you are
2012.08.25. 19:50, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.com ezt írta:
Am 25.08.2012 18:38, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
would this trigger a notice if $foo is not defined?
if yes, then it would be different from the current behavior of
the
ternary operator.
Couldn't
On 26/08/2012, at 4:09 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
2012.08.25. 19:50, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.com ezt írta:
Am 25.08.2012 18:38, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
would this trigger a notice if $foo is not defined?
if yes, then it would be different from the
So you are saying that your (teams) IDE doesn't tell you the method
signature which contains also the default values?
I guess that the fact that many of the php core functions have optional
arguments and non null defaults must be really a PITA for you.
I think what he was alluding to
Am 26.08.2012 01:57, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
So you are saying that your (teams) IDE doesn't tell you the method
signature which contains also the default values?
I guess that the fact that many of the php core functions have
optional
arguments and non null defaults
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the operators the
short ternary operator should be usable in conjunction with the
Am 24.08.2012 23:11, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.com
mailto:krebs@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with
Am 19.08.2012 00:20, schrieb Andrew Faulds:
On 18/08/12 03:36, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
implement it, because I can't :X), but to
On 18/08/12 03:36, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must implement
it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the operators the short
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the operators
the short ternary operator should be usable in conjunction with the
assignment like the other binary operators. Don't know, if anybody
understands
On 17/08/12 23:41, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must
implement it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the
operators the short ternary operator should be usable in conjunction
with the assignment like the other binary
Sent from my iPhone
On 18 Aug, 2012, at 5:41 AM, Sebastian Krebs krebs@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Don't know, how complicated this is (and also someone (not me) must implement
it, because I can't :X), but to be in sync with the operators the short
ternary operator should be usable in
13 matches
Mail list logo
