On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 20:17, Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> A 3 way up-down vote doesn't make sense. What happens if none of the 3
> options reaches 66%?
>
> The viable options here are a single RCV vote (which we've done before), or a
> single "Should we do this" vote that requires 66%, followed
Hi folks. Based on earlier discussions, we've made a number of changes to the
RFC that should address some of the concerns people raised. We also had some
very fruitful discussions off-list with several developers from the Foundation,
which led to what we feel are some solid improvements.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, at 8:12 AM, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 20:17, Larry Garfield wrote:
>>
>> A 3 way up-down vote doesn't make sense. What happens if none of the 3
>> options reaches 66%?
>>
>> The viable options here are a single RCV vote (which we've done before), or
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, at 12:12 AM, Hans Henrik Bergan wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 20:17, Larry Garfield wrote:
>>
>> A 3 way up-down vote doesn't make sense. What happens if none of the 3
>> options reaches 66%?
>>
>> The viable options here are a single RCV vote (which we've done before), or
On Mar 5, 2024, at 11:37 AM, Jakub Zelenka wrote:
>
> Please put your name forward here if you wish to be considered a candidate.
> An initial TODO page has been added to the wiki and contains provisional
> dates for GA and pre-releases [2].
>
I'm putting my hat in to the ring again for 8.4
> Notably, at least one of the volunteers must be a "veteran" release manager,
> meaning they have participated in at least one release of PHP in the past.
> The other may be an additional veteran, or more ideally, someone new to the
> RM role (in order to increase our supply of veteran RMs).
>
Hi internals,
Just want to resent this note about the updated RFC as there where no
comments last time and I'm unsure if this was due to mailing list issues.
I now have updated the RFC to allow to opt-in to new behavior on PHP 8.4
and be able to opt-out to previous behavior in PHP 9.0 via
Hi internals,
Based on the discussion of "Property accessor hooks, take 2" and the
set-hook argument type - I got to wonder why we still define "no type"
as `mixed`.
As the pseudo type `mixed` exists since PHP 8.0, which is already
out-of-date, I have the feeling it would be better to
Hello, Internals
I created an wiki for `grapheme_str_split` function.
Please see:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/grapheme_str_split
I would like to "Under Discussion" section.
Best Regards
Yuya
--
---
Yuya Hamada (tekimen)
- https://tekitoh-memdhoi.info
-
