Duncan,
maybe you should use a different model in programming. Object Oriented vs
Procedural.
Make a class with a public API as below, It handles 16 and 20 bytes
passwords with all the underling IPMI 2.0 cipher suits.
Hank,
I wasn't working on IPMI 5 years ago when this was all settled so I'm having
to piece it together from bug reports on code someone else wrote and an
industry standard specification.I'm just trying to help out the best I can.
-- Jim Mankovich | jm...@hp.com --
On 5/1/2012 5:42 AM,
Jim,
It was working 5 years ago. Document the problem and submit it.
No big deal.
h...@jblade.com
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Jim Mankovich jm...@hp.com wrote:
Hank,
I wasn't working on IPMI 5 years ago when this was all settled so I'm
having
to piece it together from bug reports on
Great! Can we get back to patching ipmitool now?
--Duncan
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Hank Bruning h...@jblade.com wrote:
Jim,
It was working 5 years ago. Document the problem and submit it.
No big deal.
h...@jblade.com
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Jim Mankovich jm...@hp.com
Duncan,
This patch looks good to me.
Thanks,
-- Jim Mankovich | jm...@hp.com --
On 5/1/2012 5:12 AM, Duncan Idaho wrote:
Jim,
it is all right. Attached is v2 which covers user name longer than 16
bytes. I've also checked the code, again, and password length restrain
will work for all
All,
I would like to request a code review of this before I submit it to the
CVS repository. This has had an initial internal review (by Jim
Mankovich). I would like to plan to submit this by May 15, 2012.
The issue that this patch addresses is when the platform supports
satellite
Jim,
as it turns out, I can't attach anything to artifact that I don't
own(which makes some ... ehm ... sense).
Anyway. Patch is attached including commit message. Your call now :)
--Duncan
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jim Mankovich jm...@hp.com wrote:
Duncan,
This patch looks good to
