Hey thanks so much for the great help! It worked perfectly.
Thanks! Best regards!!!
Mello
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Is it possible for a .NET class to provide a property with the Python
> > datetime
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it possible for a .NET class to provide a property with the Python
> datetime instead of System.DateTime?
Yep - just use PythonDateTime.datetime, in the IronPython.Modules namespace.
- Jeff
>
> Thank you very much for the attention
Hi!
Is it possible for a .NET class to provide a property with the Python
datetime instead of System.DateTime?
Thank you very much for the attention!
Best regards!
Mello
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> It worked perfectly and fast! Thank you so much
>
> Best regards
[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Jeff Hardy
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 12:38 PM
> To: Cesar Mello
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Ironpython-users] Implicit conversion of objects to float
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Cesar Mello w
It worked perfectly and fast! Thank you so much
Best regards
Mello
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> > Hey guys!
> >
> > Just curious: is there a way to implement in the .NET class something
> that
> > maps to the ** o
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> Hey guys!
>
> Just curious: is there a way to implement in the .NET class something that
> maps to the ** operator?
You should be able to create a method called __pow__ like so:
public object __pow__(object b, object e) { ... }
Replace ob
Hey guys!
Just curious: is there a way to implement in the .NET class something that
maps to the ** operator?
I've tried the other way: calling into a Python function that works as a
factory of proxy objects. These proxies overload the arithmetic operators
and delegates everything to the real (.N
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> ...
> I added conversions from System.Decimal to decimal.Decimal in
> 2.7.2, but I didn't think about implicit conversions of other types.
> I'm thinking now that anything that's either a System.Decimal or
> implicitly convertible to System.D
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> I agree it may be error-prone. But there are valid scenarios where it is not.
> Although implementing the arithmetic overloads allow me to mix DataValues and
> floats in the same expressions, I am not able to initialize a Python's
> Decima
[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im
Auftrag von Cesar Mello
Gesendet: Samstag, 25. Februar 2012 17:25
An: Jeff Hardy
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [Ironpython-users] Implicit conversion of objects to float
Hi,
Although impleme
f Hardy
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: AW: [Ironpython-users] Implicit conversion of objects to float
Hi, Cesar,
In C#, there's one difference in the following line:
double sum = val1 + val2;
Here, the compiler knows that the result of the expression should be double,
and so it
Hi,
Although implementing the arithmetic operator overloads solve my problem, I
am still curious if there is a way to implement the implicit conversion in
Python, much like the sample C# program below does. This is a question
about the language, so please forgive me if I am asking in the wrong
mai
OK thank you very much!
Best regards
Mello
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> > Thank you very much for the quick response Jeff!
> >
> > First, let me clarify I am a Python newbie, so my assumptions about
> Python
> > may
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> Thank you very much for the quick response Jeff!
>
> First, let me clarify I am a Python newbie, so my assumptions about Python
> may be all wrong.
>
> I had tried __float__ in a Python object, but it does not work implicitly
> inside expressi
Thank you very much for the quick response Jeff!
First, let me clarify I am a Python newbie, so my assumptions about Python
may be all wrong.
I had tried __float__ in a Python object, but it does not work implicitly
inside expressions (and I think that's the correct behavior). You still
have to u
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> Is there a way to satisfy both scenarios? So that the object could also be
> evaluated implicitly as a float?
>
> My first thought was to use a coercion, but the documentation does not
> recommend it. Any other suggestions please?
You didn't
Hi,
We embedded IronPython to allow users to specify custom KPIs to be
calculated from plant-floor measurements. It's woking nicely. The user
selects which measurements she wants, provides aliases to these and they
get exposed to the expression scope as variables.
But we have two kinds of users:
17 matches
Mail list logo
