Re: [Ironpython-users] Work Item 19249

2012-02-14 Thread Dino Viehland
rom: Slide [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 5:39 PM To: Dino Viehland Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ironpython-users] Work Item 19249 I was planning on making it an option to load assemblies, the current behavior would be the default. I am thinking it would be bes

Re: [Ironpython-users] Work Item 19249

2012-02-14 Thread Slide
o: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of * > Slide > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:02 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Ironpython-users] Work Item 19249 > > ** ** > > I'd like to get the thoughts of the comm

Re: [Ironpython-users] Work Item 19249

2012-02-14 Thread Dino Viehland
[email protected]] On Behalf Of Slide Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 4:02 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Ironpython-users] Work Item 19249 I'd like to get the thoughts of the community on work item 19249 [1]. I am thinking we want to either make it an option, or just le

Re: [Ironpython-users] Work Item 19249

2012-02-14 Thread Douglas S. Blank
> I'd like to get the thoughts of the community on work item 19249 [1]. I am > thinking we want to either make it an option, or just leave it as is. I > prefer the latter. I'd vote to leave as-is. There are was to make the request work, but as that deviates from standard Python, it is a signal to

[Ironpython-users] Work Item 19249

2012-02-14 Thread Slide
I'd like to get the thoughts of the community on work item 19249 [1]. I am thinking we want to either make it an option, or just leave it as is. I prefer the latter. Thanks, slide [1] http://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/19249 -- Website: http://earl-of-code.com