Hey thanks so much for the great help! It worked perfectly.
Thanks! Best regards!!!
Mello
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Is it possible for a .NET class to provide a property with the Python
> > datetime
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it possible for a .NET class to provide a property with the Python
> datetime instead of System.DateTime?
Yep - just use PythonDateTime.datetime, in the IronPython.Modules namespace.
- Jeff
>
> Thank you very much for the attention
Hi!
Is it possible for a .NET class to provide a property with the Python
datetime instead of System.DateTime?
Thank you very much for the attention!
Best regards!
Mello
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> It worked perfectly and fast! Thank you so much
>
> Best regards
[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Jeff Hardy
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 12:38 PM
> To: Cesar Mello
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Ironpython-users] Implicit conversion of objects to float
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Cesar Mello w
It worked perfectly and fast! Thank you so much
Best regards
Mello
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> > Hey guys!
> >
> > Just curious: is there a way to implement in the .NET class something
> that
> > maps to the ** o
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> Hey guys!
>
> Just curious: is there a way to implement in the .NET class something that
> maps to the ** operator?
You should be able to create a method called __pow__ like so:
public object __pow__(object b, object e) { ... }
Replace ob
Hey guys!
Just curious: is there a way to implement in the .NET class something that
maps to the ** operator?
I've tried the other way: calling into a Python function that works as a
factory of proxy objects. These proxies overload the arithmetic operators
and delegates everything to the real (.N
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> ...
> I added conversions from System.Decimal to decimal.Decimal in
> 2.7.2, but I didn't think about implicit conversions of other types.
> I'm thinking now that anything that's either a System.Decimal or
> implicitly convertible to System.D
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> I agree it may be error-prone. But there are valid scenarios where it is not.
> Although implementing the arithmetic overloads allow me to mix DataValues and
> floats in the same expressions, I am not able to initialize a Python's
> Decima
[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im
Auftrag von Cesar Mello
Gesendet: Samstag, 25. Februar 2012 17:25
An: Jeff Hardy
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [Ironpython-users] Implicit conversion of objects to float
Hi,
Although impleme
hon.org
Betreff: Re: [Ironpython-users] Implicit conversion of objects to float
Hi,
Although implementing the arithmetic operator overloads solve my problem, I am
still curious if there is a way to implement the implicit conversion in Python,
much like the sample C# program below does. This is a
Hi,
Although implementing the arithmetic operator overloads solve my problem, I
am still curious if there is a way to implement the implicit conversion in
Python, much like the sample C# program below does. This is a question
about the language, so please forgive me if I am asking in the wrong
mai
OK thank you very much!
Best regards
Mello
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> > Thank you very much for the quick response Jeff!
> >
> > First, let me clarify I am a Python newbie, so my assumptions about
> Python
> > may
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> Thank you very much for the quick response Jeff!
>
> First, let me clarify I am a Python newbie, so my assumptions about Python
> may be all wrong.
>
> I had tried __float__ in a Python object, but it does not work implicitly
> inside expressi
Thank you very much for the quick response Jeff!
First, let me clarify I am a Python newbie, so my assumptions about Python
may be all wrong.
I had tried __float__ in a Python object, but it does not work implicitly
inside expressions (and I think that's the correct behavior). You still
have to u
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> Is there a way to satisfy both scenarios? So that the object could also be
> evaluated implicitly as a float?
>
> My first thought was to use a coercion, but the documentation does not
> recommend it. Any other suggestions please?
You didn't
16 matches
Mail list logo
