Yes, a pull request would be preferred. It makes it very easy to review the
code and then incorporate it into the master.
As for the command line argument, -X:Sandbox or something like that. I
think the name of the parameter is less of a concern until its all up and
working.
slide
On Mon, Mar 19
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> Actually if you find interesting for me to pull this through a command line
> argument, do you have any suggestions on what argument should I create for
> it?
Something like -X:Sandbox (It has to be under -X: so that we don't
conflict with CPy
Actually if you find interesting for me to pull this through a command line
argument, do you have any suggestions on what argument should I create for
it?
Thanks
Best regards
Mello
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> Hi Slide,
>
> You mean I should do a pull request when I'm
Hi Slide,
You mean I should do a pull request when I'm finished?
But I'm still just playing around. I've hard-coded a sandboxed appdomain
here just for testing the idea:
https://github.com/cmello/IronLanguages-main/commit/3241688e4917c70a6db4c1b671f42c4144e8bf96
But I get remoting exceptions a
Cesar,
I think this sounds like a pretty good idea for debugging stuff. Are you
familiar with how we work with patches should you get something going?
Thanks,
slide
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Cesar Mello wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if someone other than me would find useful to
