Reported as:
http://ironruby.codeplex.com/workitem/6523
-Doug
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Doug Blank doug.bl...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI,
When trying to build IronRuby for a v2Release under Mono 2.10.2, I'm
getting a failure:
% git clone https://github.com/IronLanguages/main.git
Can someone sign up to looking into this? After confirming this builds in .NET
and not Mono, I'd first find out if this is a known Mono bug, and then provide
a patch to IronRuby to work-around this.
Please let the list know if you want to take this on,
~js
On Oct 5, 2011, at 11:10 AM, Doug
Is v2Release intended to target CLRv2? If so, this error is because that
version of C# and the BCL don't support covariance for IEnumerable.
-Original Message-
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jimmy Schementi
Sent:
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Curt Hagenlocher cu...@microsoft.com wrote:
Is v2Release intended to target CLRv2? If so, this error is because that
version of C# and the BCL don't support covariance for IEnumerable.
I believe that v2Release targets the 3.5 framework (is that the same
as
Yep, .NET 2.0, 3.0 and 3.5 all share the same fundamental CLR and the BCL bits
are strictly additive. A simple cast is not sufficient; the code will need
modification. One approach would be to insert a 3.5-only adapter function which
does something like this:
IEnumerableobject
Is downlevel-framework support still a goal for IronRuby? I seem to recall
that IronPython 2.7 is .NET 4.0-only.
We were keeping around 4.0 support for Windows Phone. It's always up for
discussion whether we continue doing that; I vote yes.
On Oct 5, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Curt Hagenlocher
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Curt Hagenlocher cu...@microsoft.com wrote:
Yep, .NET 2.0, 3.0 and 3.5 all share the same fundamental CLR and the BCL
bits are strictly additive. A simple cast is not sufficient; the code will
need modification. One approach would be to insert a 3.5-only
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Curt Hagenlocher cu...@microsoft.com wrote:
Is downlevel-framework support still a goal for IronRuby? I seem to recall
that IronPython 2.7 is .NET 4.0-only.
IronPython only 'officially' supports 4, but we occasionally make sure
that it compiles for 3.5 as well
