[isabelle-dev] jEdit: Scrollbalken in Popups

2012-11-16 Thread Lars Noschinski
Hi everyone, as can be seen on http://www21.in.tum.de/~noschinl/jedit-screenshot.png, (from Isabelle ecffea78d381 on Linux), scroll bars partially obscur the content of a popup. BTW, for theorems it would be pretty nifty, if the popup would show the theorem, not only its name. --

Re: [isabelle-dev] isabelle build glitch

2012-11-16 Thread Makarius
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Lars Noschinski wrote: I deleted and reverted $ISABELLE_HOME/lib. Now everything seems to work again. As a data point: While executing the first isa build, another instance of this Isabelle instance was running. This should already be sufficient to explain it: the build

Re: [isabelle-dev] jEdit: Scrollbalken in Popups

2012-11-16 Thread Makarius
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Lars Noschinski wrote: Hi everyone, as can be seen on http://www21.in.tum.de/~noschinl/jedit-screenshot.png, (from Isabelle ecffea78d381 on Linux), scroll bars partially obscur the content of a popup. BTW, for theorems it would be pretty nifty, if the popup would

Re: [isabelle-dev] jedit Replace Find

2012-11-16 Thread Makarius
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Tobias Nipkow wrote: This is what you should not do: search and replace a string selectively that occurs many times in a theory. I did this twice (the second time to see if it was repeatable), using Replace Find, and after about 50 replacements, jedit went all funny and

Re: [isabelle-dev] Shadowing of theorem names in locales

2012-11-16 Thread Makarius
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Johannes Hölzl wrote: HOL-Probability (in Isabelle/bb5db3d1d6dd) and Ordinary_Differential_Equations (in AFP/e9fa38f86b76) work now with this patch. A surprising change is found in Markov_Models: We get an error when an assumption has the same name as a fact in the

[isabelle-dev] SML/NJ happiness

2012-11-16 Thread Makarius
Isabelle/5e01e32dadbe is the result of spending some hours with SML/NJ and the ever growing HOL image. In the end it turned out as rather trivial thing: Time.+ needs to be used in this qualified manner, since the adhoc overloading of + on different ML systems works differently. I can't say