Nothing fancy, just a couple of code_post rules to rewrite successor
notation into numeral notation after evaluation and before printing. I
don't know if there's a better way to do that, but I think we discussed
this on the mailing list a while ago and came to the conclusion that
code_post is
What’s the idea here?
Larry
> On 5 Jul 2017, at 21:09, Manuel Eberl wrote:
>
> the proper printing of "nat" values as numerals instead of successor notation.
___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
I still want to take care of two really tiny things: the "subseq"
situation and the proper printing of "nat" values as numerals instead of
successor notation.
Just mentioning that for the sake of completeness.
Manuel
On 2017-07-05 21:04, Makarius wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> we are now almost 7
Dear all,
we are now almost 7 months after Isabelle2016-1 (December 2016).
Following the standard schedule, the Isabelle2017 release should appear
at the start of October 2017.
During the last 3 weeks in July, I will be in Cambridge. That is also a
possibility to show me old and new problems in
On 03/07/17 21:14, Simon Wimmer wrote:
>
> One thing that disturbed me in the beginning was that I first have to
> edit a document before any symbols get prettified.
This might be a weakness of the Prettify Symbols Mode, or just a mistake
in setting it up on my side. (For months, I have not