[isabelle-dev] Problem in AFP

2017-08-03 Thread Florian Haftmann
isabelle: 9a4c049f8997 tip
afp: af801987e595 tip
Running Separation_Logic_Imperative_HOL ...
*** Undefined fact: "sum_list_update_nat" (line 598 of
"/mnt/home/haftmann/data/tum/afp/master/thys/Separation_Logic_Imperative_HOL/Examples/Hash_Table.thy")
*** At command "from" (line 598 of
"/mnt/home/haftmann/data/tum/afp/master/thys/Separation_Logic_Imperative_HOL/Examples/Hash_Table.thy")
*** Undefined fact: "sum_list_update_nat" (line 580 of
"/mnt/home/haftmann/data/tum/afp/master/thys/Separation_Logic_Imperative_HOL/Examples/Hash_Table.thy")
*** At command "from" (line 580 of
"/mnt/home/haftmann/data/tum/afp/master/thys/Separation_Logic_Imperative_HOL/Examples/Hash_Table.thy")
*** Undefined fact: "sum_list_update_nat" (line 374 of
"/mnt/home/haftmann/data/tum/afp/master/thys/Separation_Logic_Imperative_HOL/Examples/Hash_Table.thy")
*** At command "from" (line 374 of
"/mnt/home/haftmann/data/tum/afp/master/thys/Separation_Logic_Imperative_HOL/Examples/Hash_Table.thy")
*** Undefined fact: "sum_list_update_nat" (line 356 of
"/mnt/home/haftmann/data/tum/afp/master/thys/Separation_Logic_Imperative_HOL/Examples/Hash_Table.thy")
*** At command "from" (line 356 of
"/mnt/home/haftmann/data/tum/afp/master/thys/Separation_Logic_Imperative_HOL/Examples/Hash_Table.thy")
Unfinished session(s): Separation_Logic_Imperative_HOL
0:02:11 elapsed time, 0:07:54 cpu time, factor 3.62

Florian

-- 

PGP available:
http://isabelle.in.tum.de/~haftmann/pgp/florian_haftmann_at_informatik_tu_muenchen_de



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev


Re: [isabelle-dev] Problem in AFP near 16e7d42ef7f4

2015-06-25 Thread Larry Paulson
I took a look, and it all runs perfectly well, except here:

show xs ∈ T⇩c ∧ ys ∈ T⇩c ∧
  ipurge_tr_rev I⇩c id u xs = ipurge_tr_rev I⇩c id u ys ⟶
  {x. u = x ∧ xs @ [x] ∈ T⇩c} = {x. u = x ∧ ys @ [x] ∈ T⇩c}
(* The following proof step performs an exhaustive case distinction over 
all traces and domains,
   and then can take long to be completed. *)
by (simp add: T⇩c_def I⇩c_def, rule impI, (erule conjE)+, cases u,
 (((erule disjE)+)?, simp, blast?)+)

The comment doesn’t tell us whether to wait minutes or hours. Clearly this is a 
fragile step. Any sort of change could break this.

Larry

 On 25 Jun 2015, at 14:00, Florian Haftmann 
 florian.haftm...@informatik.tu-muenchen.de wrote:
 
 isabelle: 19c277ea65ae tip
 afp: 16e7d42ef7f4 tip
 
 Running Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding ...
 *** Timeout
 Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding FAILED
 (see also
 /mnt/home/haftmann/data/isabelle/master/heaps/polyml-5.5.2_x86-linux/log/Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding)
 
 val it = (): unit
 Loading theory GenericUnwinding
 Proofs for inductive predicate(s) rel_induct_auxp
  Proving monotonicity ...
  Proving the introduction rules ...
  Proving the elimination rules ...
  Proving the induction rule ...
  Proving the simplification rules ...
 ### theory GenericUnwinding
 ### 1.941s elapsed time, 11.008s cpu time, 0.136s GC time
 
 Any hints what could have gone wrong?
 
   Florian
 
 -- 
 
 PGP available:
 http://home.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/haftmann/pgp/florian_haftmann_at_informatik_tu_muenchen_de
 
 ___
 isabelle-dev mailing list
 isabelle-...@in.tum.de
 https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev


[isabelle-dev] Problem in AFP near 16e7d42ef7f4

2015-06-25 Thread Florian Haftmann
isabelle: 19c277ea65ae tip
afp: 16e7d42ef7f4 tip

Running Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding ...
*** Timeout
Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding FAILED
(see also
/mnt/home/haftmann/data/isabelle/master/heaps/polyml-5.5.2_x86-linux/log/Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding)

val it = (): unit
Loading theory GenericUnwinding
Proofs for inductive predicate(s) rel_induct_auxp
  Proving monotonicity ...
  Proving the introduction rules ...
  Proving the elimination rules ...
  Proving the induction rule ...
  Proving the simplification rules ...
### theory GenericUnwinding
### 1.941s elapsed time, 11.008s cpu time, 0.136s GC time

Any hints what could have gone wrong?

Florian

-- 

PGP available:
http://home.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/haftmann/pgp/florian_haftmann_at_informatik_tu_muenchen_de



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev


Re: [isabelle-dev] Problem in AFP near 16e7d42ef7f4

2015-06-25 Thread Florian Haftmann
Maybe this is hitting the concrete wall set by hardware constraints.

I am building on lxbroy10; relevant settings might include

 ISABELLE_BUILD_JAVA_OPTIONS=-Xmx4096m -Xss2m
 ISABELLE_PLATFORM32=x86-linux
 ISABELLE_JAVA_SYSTEM_OPTIONS=-server -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 
 -Disabelle.threads=0
 ISABELLE_PLATFORM64=x86_64-linux
 ISABELLE_PLATFORM=x86-linux
 ISABELLE_SCALA_BUILD_OPTIONS=-encoding UTF-8 -nowarn -target:jvm-1.7 
 -Xmax-classfile-name 130

In my view lxbroy10 still has some status as a reference machine, and I
am seriously concerned as soon as resources appear to be too tiny there.

Anybody else experiencing similar problems?

Florian

Am 25.06.2015 um 15:00 schrieb Florian Haftmann:
 isabelle: 19c277ea65ae tip
 afp: 16e7d42ef7f4 tip
 
 Running Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding ...
 *** Timeout
 Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding FAILED
 (see also
 /mnt/home/haftmann/data/isabelle/master/heaps/polyml-5.5.2_x86-linux/log/Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding)
 
 val it = (): unit
 Loading theory GenericUnwinding
 Proofs for inductive predicate(s) rel_induct_auxp
   Proving monotonicity ...
   Proving the introduction rules ...
   Proving the elimination rules ...
   Proving the induction rule ...
   Proving the simplification rules ...
 ### theory GenericUnwinding
 ### 1.941s elapsed time, 11.008s cpu time, 0.136s GC time
 
 Any hints what could have gone wrong?
 
   Florian
 
 
 
 ___
 isabelle-dev mailing list
 isabelle-...@in.tum.de
 https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
 

-- 

PGP available:
http://home.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/haftmann/pgp/florian_haftmann_at_informatik_tu_muenchen_de



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev


Re: [isabelle-dev] Problem in AFP near 16e7d42ef7f4

2015-06-25 Thread Florian Haftmann
Hi Larry,
thanks for finding out so quickly!

Florian
Am 25.06.2015 um 16:02 schrieb Larry Paulson:
 This does it nicely (20s):
 
apply (simp add: T⇩c_def I⇩c_def)
apply clarify
apply (cases u; elim disjE; simp; blast)
 
 
 Larry
 
 On 25 Jun 2015, at 14:52, Larry Paulson l...@cam.ac.uk wrote:

 I took a look, and it all runs perfectly well, except here:

show xs ∈ T⇩c ∧ ys ∈ T⇩c ∧
  ipurge_tr_rev I⇩c id u xs = ipurge_tr_rev I⇩c id u ys ⟶
  {x. u = x ∧ xs @ [x] ∈ T⇩c} = {x. u = x ∧ ys @ [x] ∈ T⇩c}
(* The following proof step performs an exhaustive case distinction over 
 all traces and domains,
   and then can take long to be completed. *)
by (simp add: T⇩c_def I⇩c_def, rule impI, (erule conjE)+, cases u,
 (((erule disjE)+)?, simp, blast?)+)

 The comment doesn’t tell us whether to wait minutes or hours. Clearly this 
 is a fragile step. Any sort of change could break this.

 Larry

 On 25 Jun 2015, at 14:00, Florian Haftmann 
 florian.haftm...@informatik.tu-muenchen.de wrote:

 isabelle: 19c277ea65ae tip
 afp: 16e7d42ef7f4 tip

 Running Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding ...
 *** Timeout
 Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding FAILED
 (see also
 /mnt/home/haftmann/data/isabelle/master/heaps/polyml-5.5.2_x86-linux/log/Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding)

 val it = (): unit
 Loading theory GenericUnwinding
 Proofs for inductive predicate(s) rel_induct_auxp
 Proving monotonicity ...
 Proving the introduction rules ...
 Proving the elimination rules ...
 Proving the induction rule ...
 Proving the simplification rules ...
 ### theory GenericUnwinding
 ### 1.941s elapsed time, 11.008s cpu time, 0.136s GC time

 Any hints what could have gone wrong?

 Florian

 -- 

 PGP available:
 http://home.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/haftmann/pgp/florian_haftmann_at_informatik_tu_muenchen_de

 ___
 isabelle-dev mailing list
 isabelle-...@in.tum.de
 https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

 ___
 isabelle-dev mailing list
 isabelle-...@in.tum.de
 https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
 

-- 

PGP available:
http://home.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/haftmann/pgp/florian_haftmann_at_informatik_tu_muenchen_de



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev


Re: [isabelle-dev] Problem in AFP near 16e7d42ef7f4

2015-06-25 Thread Larry Paulson
This does it nicely (20s):

   apply (simp add: T⇩c_def I⇩c_def)
   apply clarify
   apply (cases u; elim disjE; simp; blast)


Larry

 On 25 Jun 2015, at 14:52, Larry Paulson l...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
 
 I took a look, and it all runs perfectly well, except here:
 
show xs ∈ T⇩c ∧ ys ∈ T⇩c ∧
  ipurge_tr_rev I⇩c id u xs = ipurge_tr_rev I⇩c id u ys ⟶
  {x. u = x ∧ xs @ [x] ∈ T⇩c} = {x. u = x ∧ ys @ [x] ∈ T⇩c}
(* The following proof step performs an exhaustive case distinction over 
 all traces and domains,
   and then can take long to be completed. *)
by (simp add: T⇩c_def I⇩c_def, rule impI, (erule conjE)+, cases u,
 (((erule disjE)+)?, simp, blast?)+)
 
 The comment doesn’t tell us whether to wait minutes or hours. Clearly this is 
 a fragile step. Any sort of change could break this.
 
 Larry
 
 On 25 Jun 2015, at 14:00, Florian Haftmann 
 florian.haftm...@informatik.tu-muenchen.de wrote:
 
 isabelle: 19c277ea65ae tip
 afp: 16e7d42ef7f4 tip
 
 Running Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding ...
 *** Timeout
 Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding FAILED
 (see also
 /mnt/home/haftmann/data/isabelle/master/heaps/polyml-5.5.2_x86-linux/log/Noninterference_Generic_Unwinding)
 
 val it = (): unit
 Loading theory GenericUnwinding
 Proofs for inductive predicate(s) rel_induct_auxp
 Proving monotonicity ...
 Proving the introduction rules ...
 Proving the elimination rules ...
 Proving the induction rule ...
 Proving the simplification rules ...
 ### theory GenericUnwinding
 ### 1.941s elapsed time, 11.008s cpu time, 0.136s GC time
 
 Any hints what could have gone wrong?
 
  Florian
 
 -- 
 
 PGP available:
 http://home.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/haftmann/pgp/florian_haftmann_at_informatik_tu_muenchen_de
 
 ___
 isabelle-dev mailing list
 isabelle-...@in.tum.de
 https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
 
 ___
 isabelle-dev mailing list
 isabelle-...@in.tum.de
 https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev


[isabelle-dev] Problem in AFP/Ordinary_Differential_Equations

2013-11-05 Thread Florian Haftmann
isabelle id 9d623cada37f
afp id 68e8895167cc

Florian

-- 

PGP available:
http://home.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/haftmann/pgp/florian_haftmann_at_informatik_tu_muenchen_de



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev


Re: [isabelle-dev] Problem in AFP/Ordinary_Differential_Equations

2013-11-05 Thread Johannes Hölzl
solved in afp id 03689082b646

Am Dienstag, den 05.11.2013, 19:09 +0100 schrieb Florian Haftmann:
 isabelle id 9d623cada37f
 afp id 68e8895167cc



___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev