On 29/06/18 08:08, José Manuel Rodriguez Caballero wrote:
> Thank you by the information. I sorry if this mailing list was not the
> best to ask this legal question, I did not find another one more
> appropriated for this subject.
By default you can post everything on isabelle-users, unless it
Hi Makarius and Gerwin,
Thank you by the information. I sorry if this mailing list was not the
best to ask this legal question, I did not find another one more
appropriated for this subject. With respect to Makarius worries with open
source, I'm the first who enjoys open source.
Kind Regards,
On 28/06/18 07:55, José Manuel Rodriguez Caballero wrote:
>
> Motivated by my exchange of experiences with professionals using
> proof-assistants like Coq for commercial purposes, I would like to ask
> the following question is: which are the regulations of Isabelle for
> commercial use? For
Isabelle is distributed under a BSD 3-clause license. The only restrictions for
Isabelle itself are (see COPYRIGHT file):
* Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* Redistributions in binary form must
Dear Sir or Madam,
Motivated by my exchange of experiences with professionals using
proof-assistants like Coq for commercial purposes, I would like to ask the
following question is: which are the regulations of Isabelle for commercial
use? For example, if a software company is interested in
