Boycott Israel [IslamCity] Interview with Shaykh Hamza Yusuf

2007-05-20 Thread saiyed shahbazi
This is an edited transcript of an interview that took place in September 2006.

Q: Linden MacIntyre: What are the roots of Muslim rage? 

A: Hamza Yusuf: If you had one word to describe the root of all this rage, it's 
humiliation. Arabs in particular are extremely proud people. If you look at 
what happened in Lebanon recently, the Arabs kind of raised their head-- they 
think it's a big victory, the fact that their whole country was destroyed and 
over a thousand people were killed, many of them children. Why is it a victory? 
Because they fought back. That's all. OK, you can crush us into the Earth, but 
you're not going to get us to submit. And I think that's deeply rooted in 
Muslim consciousness, the idea of not submitting to anything other than God. 
You can abuse me, but you're not going to win me over. But if you treat me 
with respect and dignity, I'm going to fall in love with you. I'm going to sing 
your praises all over the world because you're powerful and you treated me with 
human dignity. 

Q: Where do they see the proof of the humiliation? 

A: It's everywhere. You don't think it's humiliating to have a foreign force 
come into your land? You see, Muslims don't have this nation state idea. 
There's a tribe called Bani Tamin. It's one of the biggest tribes in Saudi 
Arabia and in Iraq, and they're intermarried. The West doesn't seem to 
understand that. The Moroccans feel the Iraqi pain as their own. It's one pain. 
So when you see some American soldier banging down a door and coming into a 
house with all these women in utter fear who've done nothing, that's 
humiliation, and it's going to enrage people. And what are we doing there? 
There are no weapons of mass destruction. They were never a threat to us. You 
know, Shakespeare wrote a play called Julius Caesar, and it was all about the 
danger of pre-emptive strikes. Brutus is convinced by Cassius to kill Caesar. 
Why? Because Caesar's ambitious, because he might declare himself king. And the 
end of that play, everybody dies; it's just disaster. That's the tragedy of
 pre-emptive strikes. 

Q: What goes through your mind when you hear about all these roundups of young 
Muslims who are supposedly plotting things in London and in Toronto? 

A: We keep being told about these roundups, and in the end, they're more 
aspirational than operational. I'd love to have been in the meeting when they 
thought that one up. It seems to me that they're just a lot of bumbling fools 
out there. 

Q: On which side of the equation? 

A: On both sides. I mean, that's part of the problem. Violence is the last 
refuge of the incompetent, and I think that's really what we're dealing with 
here, incompetence. Both sides have been incredibly ineffective at achieving 
their goals-- at least their stated goals. 

Q: I'm trying to get a measure of just how concerned people should really be 
though. 

A: Listen, hurricanes are a much greater threat to us right now. Katrina did 
much more damage than anything the terrorists could ever put together. Yeah, 
there's nuclear weapons are out there and that certainly is a concern. That's 
the job of these intelligence people to stop that, right? But stop making us 
all live in fear and telling us about orange and red levels. All that nonsense 
just simply has to stop. We need to calm down and think at a deeper level. 
People can't think when their minds are clouded with fear. The fear tactic is a 
tactic that's used by people who want to maintain control, and it's very 
effective. 

A democracy is predicated on an educated citizenry. You cannot have a democracy 
with people that are more interested in what Nicole Kidman is doing or whoever 
the latest fashion model is. If that's your interest, democracy can't survive. 
You also have corporate interests here. We have an arms industry in the West 
that is our No. 1 industry. It's bigger than anything-- automobiles, 
everything. Now if you don't have reasons to build weapons, where do all those 
contracts go? 

Q: Your job is to recruit young people into a more constructive project. 

A: Well, I'm not a recruiter …. 

Q: You are definitely an influence. 

A: I've got my own personal projects, like my school and my seminary. But at 
this point in my life, I'm actually just trying to put some balance out there 
because I feel that there's an incredible amount of disequilibrium in the way 
people are acting and the way they're thinking. There are irrational fears. If 
you see a woman wearing a hijab and fear is your first thought, something's 
really wrong. How do you racially profile terrorists when 90percent of the 
world falls into that? Mexicans look like Arabs, for God's sake, and anybody 
can change their name. I mean Abdullah can change his name to Eduardo. It's not 
going to be difficult, if they're clever. So how do you profile people? 

Q: Six years ago, there were probably the same number of disenchanted young 
people in chat rooms and coffee houses complaining and 

Boycott Israel [IslamCity] interview with Shaykh Hamza Yusuf

2007-02-21 Thread saiyed shahbazi
INTERVIEW With Sheik Hamza Yusuf 

   
  Hamza Yusuf was born in Washington State and grew up in Northern California, 
where he lives with his wife and five children. He converted to Islam in 1977 
and spent 10 years studying Islam in the Middle East where he followed a more 
classic interpretation of the religion. After the attacks of 9/11, Yusuf 
emerged as a respected Islamic scholar, advising both the White House and the 
Arab League. In recent years, he has focused his teachings on bridging the 
widening gap between the West and the Muslim world. In this interview, he talks 
about tyranny and incompetence on both sides and offers his prescription 
for creating more common ground. This is an edited transcript of an interview 
that took place in September 2006.
   
  Q: Linden MacIntyre: What are the roots of Muslim rage?
  A: Hamza Yusuf: If you had one word to describe the root of all this rage, 
it's humiliation. Arabs in particular are extremely proud people. If you look 
at what happened in Lebanon recently, the Arabs kind of raised their head-- 
they think it's a big victory, the fact that their whole country was destroyed 
and over a thousand people were killed, many of them children. Why is it a 
victory? Because they fought back. That's all. OK, you can crush us into the 
Earth, but you're not going to get us to submit. And I think that's deeply 
rooted in Muslim consciousness, the idea of not submitting to anything other 
than God. You can abuse me, but you're not going to win me over. But if you 
treat me with respect and dignity, I'm going to fall in love with you. I'm 
going to sing your praises all over the world because you're powerful and you 
treated me with human dignity. 
  Q: Where do they see the proof of the humiliation?
  A: It's everywhere. You don't think it's humiliating to have a foreign force 
come into your land? You see, Muslims don't have this nation state idea. 
There's a tribe called Bani Tamin. It's one of the biggest tribes in Saudi 
Arabia and in Iraq, and they're intermarried. The West doesn't seem to 
understand that. The Moroccans feel the Iraqi pain as their own. It's one pain. 
So when you see some American soldier banging down a door and coming into a 
house with all these women in utter fear who've done nothing, that's 
humiliation, and it's going to enrage people. And what are we doing there? 
There are no weapons of mass destruction. They were never a threat to us. You 
know, Shakespeare wrote a play called Julius Caesar, and it was all about the 
danger of pre-emptive strikes. Brutus is convinced by Cassius to kill Caesar. 
Why? Because Caesar's ambitious, because he might declare himself king. And the 
end of that play, everybody dies; it's just disaster. That's the tragedy of
 pre-emptive strikes.
  Q: What goes through your mind when you hear about all these roundups of 
young Muslims who are supposedly plotting things in London and in Toronto?
  A: We keep being told about these roundups, and in the end, they're more 
aspirational than operational. I'd love to have been in the meeting when they 
thought that one up. It seems to me that they're just a lot of bumbling fools 
out there.
  Q: On which side of the equation?
  A: On both sides. I mean, that's part of the problem. Violence is the last 
refuge of the incompetent, and I think that's really what we're dealing with 
here, incompetence. Both sides have been incredibly ineffective at achieving 
their goals-- at least their stated goals.
  Q: I'm trying to get a measure of just how concerned people should really be 
though.
  A: Listen, hurricanes are a much greater threat to us right now. Katrina did 
much more damage than anything the terrorists could ever put together. Yeah, 
there's nuclear weapons are out there and that certainly is a concern. That's 
the job of these intelligence people to stop that, right? But stop making us 
all live in fear and telling us about orange and red levels. All that nonsense 
just simply has to stop. We need to calm down and think at a deeper level. 
People can't think when their minds are clouded with fear. The fear tactic is a 
tactic that's used by people who want to maintain control, and it's very 
effective. 
  A democracy is predicated on an educated citizenry. You cannot have a 
democracy with people that are more interested in what Nicole Kidman is doing 
or whoever the latest fashion model is. If that's your interest, democracy 
can't survive. You also have corporate interests here. We have an arms industry 
in the West that is our No. 1 industry. It's bigger than anything-- 
automobiles, everything. Now if you don't have reasons to build weapons, where 
do all those contracts go? 
  Q: Your job is to recruit young people into a more constructive project.
  A: Well, I'm not a recruiter ….
  Q: You are definitely an influence.
  A: I've got my own personal projects, like my school and my seminary. But at 
this point in my life, I'm actually just trying