[jira] [Commented] (COMPRESS-390) Expose zip stream offset and size via API

2017-04-29 Thread Zbynek Vyskovsky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15990125#comment-15990125 ] Zbynek Vyskovsky commented on COMPRESS-390: --- Thanks, Stefan. About the name - could be, I'll

[jira] [Commented] (COMPRESS-390) Expose zip stream offset and size via API

2017-04-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15990116#comment-15990116 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on COMPRESS-390: - I'm fine with your proposal and it works for me in

[jira] [Comment Edited] (COMPRESS-390) Expose zip stream offset and size via API

2017-04-29 Thread Zbynek Vyskovsky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15990111#comment-15990111 ] Zbynek Vyskovsky edited comment on COMPRESS-390 at 4/30/17 4:01 AM:

[jira] [Commented] (COMPRESS-390) Expose zip stream offset and size via API

2017-04-29 Thread Zbynek Vyskovsky (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15990111#comment-15990111 ] Zbynek Vyskovsky commented on COMPRESS-390: --- [~bodewig] No problem,I'm sorry about the delay,

[jira] [Commented] (LANG-1326) StringUtils#isAllEmpty and #isAllBlank should return false for an empty array

2017-04-29 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15990021#comment-15990021 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on LANG-1326: -- Github user coveralls commented on the issue:

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #267: LANG-1326 - Fixed isAllEmpty and isAllBlank

2017-04-29 Thread coveralls
Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/267 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11304534/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11304534) Coverage remained the same at 94.655% when pulling

[jira] [Commented] (LANG-1326) StringUtils#isAllEmpty and #isAllBlank should return false for an empty array

2017-04-29 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15990018#comment-15990018 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on LANG-1326: -- GitHub user arbasha opened a pull request:

[GitHub] commons-lang pull request #267: LANG-1326 - Fixed isAllEmpty and isAllBlank

2017-04-29 Thread arbasha
GitHub user arbasha opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/267 LANG-1326 - Fixed isAllEmpty and isAllBlank If the description of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1271 is what is the agreed behavior, then I believe isAllEmpty and isAllBlank

[jira] [Created] (LANG-1326) StringUtils#isAllEmpty and #isAllBlank should return false for an empty array

2017-04-29 Thread Arshad Basha (JIRA)
Arshad Basha created LANG-1326: -- Summary: StringUtils#isAllEmpty and #isAllBlank should return false for an empty array Key: LANG-1326 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1326 Project:

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #266: docs - fixed faulty samples of isNoneEmpty/isNoneBl...

2017-04-29 Thread coveralls
Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/266 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11304368/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11304368) Coverage increased (+0.03%) to 94.682% when pulling

[GitHub] commons-lang pull request #266: docs - fixed faulty samples of isNoneEmpty/i...

2017-04-29 Thread arbasha
GitHub user arbasha opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/266 docs - fixed faulty samples of isNoneEmpty/isNoneBlank Fixed faulty samples of isNoneEmpty/isNoneBlank and also added new ones to isAnyEmpty/isNoneEmpty/isAnyBlank/isNoneBlank for better

[jira] [Commented] (LANG-1325) Increase test coverage of ToStringBuilder class to 100%

2017-04-29 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15989897#comment-15989897 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on LANG-1325: -- Github user coveralls commented on the issue:

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #265: LANG-1325: Increase test coverage of ToStringBuilde...

2017-04-29 Thread coveralls
Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/265 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11303110/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11303110) Coverage increased (+0.4%) to 95.074% when pulling

[jira] [Commented] (LANG-1325) Increase test coverage of ToStringBuilder class to 100%

2017-04-29 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15989885#comment-15989885 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on LANG-1325: -- Github user arbasha commented on the issue:

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #265: LANG-1325: Increase test coverage of ToStringBuilde...

2017-04-29 Thread arbasha
Github user arbasha commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/265 @kinow done! thanks for looking :+1: --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[jira] [Commented] (LANG-1325) Increase test coverage of ToStringBuilder class to 100%

2017-04-29 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15989884#comment-15989884 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on LANG-1325: -- Github user coveralls commented on the issue:

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #265: LANG-1325: Increase test coverage of ToStringBuilde...

2017-04-29 Thread coveralls
Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/265 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11302939/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11302939) Coverage increased (+0.4%) to 95.074% when pulling

[jira] [Commented] (LANG-1325) Increase test coverage of ToStringBuilder class to 100%

2017-04-29 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15989883#comment-15989883 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on LANG-1325: -- Github user kinow commented on the issue:

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #265: LANG-1325: Increase test coverage of ToStringBuilde...

2017-04-29 Thread kinow
Github user kinow commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/265 That looks good, thanks! The coveralls bot normally tells us here if the coverage increased or decreased. However, looks like you have added tabs to your code, and that caused Travis CI build

[jira] [Commented] (LANG-1325) Increase test coverage of ToStringBuilder class to 100%

2017-04-29 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15989877#comment-15989877 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on LANG-1325: -- GitHub user arbasha opened a pull request:

[GitHub] commons-lang pull request #265: LANG-1325: Increase test coverage of ToStrin...

2017-04-29 Thread arbasha
GitHub user arbasha opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/265 LANG-1325: Increase test coverage of ToStringBuilder class to 100% Adding test cases to test the following methods of "ToStringBuilder" class. With this, the code coverage stands at 100%.

[jira] [Created] (LANG-1325) Increase test coverage of ToStringBuilder class to 100%

2017-04-29 Thread Arshad Basha (JIRA)
Arshad Basha created LANG-1325: -- Summary: Increase test coverage of ToStringBuilder class to 100% Key: LANG-1325 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1325 Project: Commons Lang Issue

[jira] [Commented] (COMPRESS-390) Expose zip stream offset and size via API

2017-04-29 Thread Stefan Bodewig (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15989870#comment-15989870 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on COMPRESS-390: - [~kvr] please don't get this discussion wrong. I

[GitHub] commons-lang pull request #264: HashSetvBitSetTest diamond operator

2017-04-29 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/264 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #264: HashSetvBitSetTest diamond operator

2017-04-29 Thread PascalSchumacher
Github user PascalSchumacher commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/264 Thanks! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #264: HashSetvBitSetTest diamond operator

2017-04-29 Thread coveralls
Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/264 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11301312/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11301312) Coverage increased (+0.04%) to 94.693% when pulling

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #264: HashSetvBitSetTest diamond operator

2017-04-29 Thread coveralls
Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/264 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/11301312/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/11301312) Coverage increased (+0.04%) to 94.693% when pulling

[GitHub] commons-lang pull request #264: HashSetvBitSetTest diamond operator

2017-04-29 Thread mureinik
GitHub user mureinik opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/264 HashSetvBitSetTest diamond operator Use Java 7's diamond operator to make the code a tad more elegant, as done in the rest of the codebase. You can merge this pull request into a Git