[jira] [Commented] (LANG-1004) DurationFormatUtils#formatDurationHMS implementation does not correspond to Javadoc and vice versa

2014-05-04 Thread Benedikt Ritter (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988950#comment-13988950 ] Benedikt Ritter commented on LANG-1004: --- Hello Michael, After applying your patch I

[jira] [Commented] (LANG-1004) DurationFormatUtils#formatDurationHMS implementation does not correspond to Javadoc and vice versa

2014-05-04 Thread Benedikt Ritter (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13989015#comment-13989015 ] Benedikt Ritter commented on LANG-1004: --- {code}

[jira] [Commented] (LANG-1004) DurationFormatUtils#formatDurationHMS implementation does not correspond to Javadoc and vice versa

2014-05-04 Thread Michael Osipov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13989081#comment-13989081 ] Michael Osipov commented on LANG-1004: -- With pleasure, being a Commons Lang user for

[jira] [Commented] (LANG-1004) DurationFormatUtils#formatDurationHMS implementation does not correspond to Javadoc and vice versa

2014-05-02 Thread Benedikt Ritter (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987919#comment-13987919 ] Benedikt Ritter commented on LANG-1004: --- Hi Michael, nice patch! However I'm a bit

[jira] [Commented] (LANG-1004) DurationFormatUtils#formatDurationHMS implementation does not correspond to Javadoc and vice versa

2014-05-02 Thread Michael Osipov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988341#comment-13988341 ] Michael Osipov commented on LANG-1004: -- I guess you are right about the usecase but we