[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13147904#comment-13147904
]
Henri Yandell commented on IO-271:
--
Should this be resolved as WontFix?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13147959#comment-13147959
]
Sebb commented on IO-271:
-
Yes, I think WontFix is appropriate.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13030697#comment-13030697
]
Stephen Kestle commented on IO-271:
---
Did I mention I'm trying to do an automatic upgrade on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13030828#comment-13030828
]
Sebb commented on IO-271:
-
As already noted, listFiles() uses a private File constructor to create the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13030470#comment-13030470
]
Stephen Kestle commented on IO-271:
---
Yeah, I tend to agree in the general case. Perhaps it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13030476#comment-13030476
]
Sebb commented on IO-271:
-
I'm not sure the memory usage checking strategy is appropriate, If you are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13030354#comment-13030354
]
Sebb commented on IO-271:
-
If using String[] list() instead of File[] listFile():
* when using a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13029669#comment-13029669
]
Sebb commented on IO-271:
-
Using list() instead of listFiles() would be possible, but would only
