exceptionfactory closed pull request #8677: NIFI-12998 Restructured
project/build to drive better enforcement/maintainability of framework vs
extensions. Makes it easier for people to build extensions outside our
codebase as well with boms they can leverage just as we ourselves do. Build
joewitt commented on PR #8677:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/8677#issuecomment-2075589942
the check failures seem spurious/unrelated. meanwhile i am rebasing to get
these latest commits from main and will push up in about 11 minutes after all
checks out locally
--
This is
joewitt commented on PR #8677:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/8677#issuecomment-2075506357
Sounds good. I tried to honor those throughout so not sure why these
weren't. But updated.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
joewitt commented on PR #8677:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/8677#issuecomment-2070333872
Squashed all the commits so any further improvements can be seen more easily.
Fixed the runtime-manifest-generator output which was getting conflicting
log provider implementations.
joewitt commented on PR #8677:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/8677#issuecomment-2069925710
Will rebase for latest commit that landed on main.
Will remove dependency:analyze-only from pom. It can be activated on the
command line during builds whenever people need.
joewitt commented on PR #8677:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/8677#issuecomment-2068095785
Reduced build size another few MB. Tightened up and cleaned boilerplate in
poms. Fixed a few lingering test issues related to nifi-jetty-bundle vs
nifi-jetty-nar. Some strange issue with
joewitt commented on PR #8677:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/8677#issuecomment-2067513494
So far unable to understand why github ci failed the nifi-jetty-nar test.
Locally it works fine and the source that creates those nar's does not
reference nifi-jetty-bundle or
joewitt commented on PR #8677:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/8677#issuecomment-2067242412
'nifi-jetty-bundle' was also renamed to 'nifi-jetty-nar' to be consistent
with all other nar naming
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
joewitt commented on PR #8677:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/8677#issuecomment-2067219879
1. need to fix dependency regressions that now are vuln versions.
2. need to fix errors in
https://github.com/apache/nifi/actions/runs/8758685134/job/24040051585?pr=8677.
This stems
joewitt commented on PR #8677:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/8677#issuecomment-2067197169
@exceptionfactory reports the following deps show up now and had been
upgraded. they have known vulns
Specifically the following:
commons-compiler-3.1.9.jar
joewitt opened a new pull request, #8677:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/8677
# Summary
[NIFI-0](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-0)
# Tracking
Please complete the following tracking steps
11 matches
Mail list logo
