https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128019
jeffooo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeff...@orange.fr
--
You are receiving this
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128019
--- Comment #5 from Peter ---
I like the UTF-8 approach as described on https://utf8everywhere.org/ but I
have not many insights on alternatives.
I think we should decouple the string implementation from OpenOffice. This
would allow us to be able
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128019
--- Comment #4 from Peter ---
I added the 67649 for reference on an issue. Because an String Overhaul has the
high possibility of fixing the other Bug. (IMHO)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128019
Peter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||67649
Referenced Issues:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128019
--- Comment #3 from dam...@apache.org ---
We have C string structs and C++ string wrapper classes around those, found in
main/sal, in ASCII and "Unicode" (UTF-16) versions, with 2^32 chars max length.
Another 2 are in main/tools, 2^16 chars max
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128019
--- Comment #2 from Peter ---
Do we need 6? shouldn't be one enough?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128019
dam...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dam...@apache.org
--- Comment #1 from
