[jira] [Assigned] (MASSEMBLY-843) finalName as readonly parameter makes common usecases very complicated

2023-05-03 Thread Slawomir Jaranowski (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Slawomir Jaranowski reassigned MASSEMBLY-843:
-

Assignee: Slawomir Jaranowski

> finalName as readonly parameter makes common usecases very complicated
> --
>
> Key: MASSEMBLY-843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-843
> Project: Maven Assembly Plugin
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>Reporter: Ulf Dreyer
>Assignee: Slawomir Jaranowski
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.6.0
>
>
> The "improvement" done in MASSEMBLY-817 makes some usecases very inconvenient:
> We need to create an archive with one stable name (independent of e.g. 
> version) so we don't have to propagate these information to a bunch of 
> scripts.
> The general solution (i.e. Stack-overflow) refers exactly to the finalName:
> [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20697144/can-not-set-the-final-jar-name-with-maven-assembly-plugin]
> *Please change finalName back to a settable property.*
> It being settable does not hurt anyone satisfied with the default naming 
> convention but makes some usecases vastly simpler (otherwise you have to 
> rename the artifact using yet another plugin or propagate version info 
> possibly through a chain of scripts)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)


[jira] [Assigned] (MASSEMBLY-843) finalName as readonly parameter makes common usecases very complicated

2017-06-17 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Karl Heinz Marbaise reassigned MASSEMBLY-843:
-

Assignee: (was: Karl Heinz Marbaise)

> finalName as readonly parameter makes common usecases very complicated
> --
>
> Key: MASSEMBLY-843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-843
> Project: Maven Assembly Plugin
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>Reporter: Ulf Dreyer
>
> The "improvement" done in MASSEMBLY-817 makes some usecases very inconvenient:
> We need to create an archive with one stable name (independent of e.g. 
> version) so we don't have to propagate these information to a bunch of 
> scripts.
> The general solution (i.e. Stack-overflow) refers exactly to the finalName:
> [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20697144/can-not-set-the-final-jar-name-with-maven-assembly-plugin]
> *Please change finalName back to a settable property.*
> It being settable does not hurt anyone satisfied with the default naming 
> convention but makes some usecases vastly simpler (otherwise you have to 
> rename the artifact using yet another plugin or propagate version info 
> possibly through a chain of scripts)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (MASSEMBLY-843) finalName as readonly parameter makes common usecases very complicated

2017-06-17 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Karl Heinz Marbaise reassigned MASSEMBLY-843:
-

Assignee: Karl Heinz Marbaise

> finalName as readonly parameter makes common usecases very complicated
> --
>
> Key: MASSEMBLY-843
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-843
> Project: Maven Assembly Plugin
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 3.0.0
>Reporter: Ulf Dreyer
>Assignee: Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> The "improvement" done in MASSEMBLY-817 makes some usecases very inconvenient:
> We need to create an archive with one stable name (independent of e.g. 
> version) so we don't have to propagate these information to a bunch of 
> scripts.
> The general solution (i.e. Stack-overflow) refers exactly to the finalName:
> [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20697144/can-not-set-the-final-jar-name-with-maven-assembly-plugin]
> *Please change finalName back to a settable property.*
> It being settable does not hurt anyone satisfied with the default naming 
> convention but makes some usecases vastly simpler (otherwise you have to 
> rename the artifact using yet another plugin or propagate version info 
> possibly through a chain of scripts)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)