Hello Mark,
Thank you for taking the time in confirming what I observed.
I had thought about using the "name" instead, but it doesn't play well in my
mind. Using a Ivy property to define an artifact name would feel a bit weird to
me. I need to use a property because the conf is only resolved
I did some tests with "type".
What I've found out is that I need to specify both "conf" and "type" to the
same value in my publications, "cortex-m4_gcc_withoutLoc" for example.
conf is needed for resolving the dependency (type can't be used with the
element).
type is needed for allowing
