Yes, I do not see an effect...
Here is my unit test that test it:
public void testFairSimilarity() throws CorruptIndexException,
IOException, ParseException
{
Directory theDirectory = new RAMDirectory();
Analyzer theAnalyzer = new FrenchAnalyzer();
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 11:40 -0800, Michael Busch wrote:
what kind of queries are you using for your tests? (num query terms,
booleans clauses, phrases, wildcards?)
No numbers (at least not parsed as numbers), no ranges, some wildcards,
some phrases. The only non-trivial part of the queries is
I am looking at the IndexWriter source code - and I could not find a method
(private) to delete by doc id.
Where is it hiding?
Best,
-C.B.
On Jan 19, 2008 1:07 PM, Michael McCandless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Good question
So far, this method has not been carried over to IndexWriter
Exactly, that is the method...
Mike
Cam Bazz wrote:
Hello,
Did you mean the
synchronized private void addDeleteDocID(int docId) {
bufferedDeleteDocIDs.add(new Integer(docId));
numBytesUsed += OBJECT_HEADER_BYTES + BYTES_PER_INT +
OBJECT_POINTER_BYTES;
}
this however does not
Thanks for your detailed answer, Toke! Is your default operator AND or OR?
Toke Eskildsen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 11:40 -0800, Michael Busch wrote:
what kind of queries are you using for your tests? (num query terms,
booleans clauses, phrases, wildcards?)
No numbers (at least not
Well, docIDs are used all over the place in the index. Sometimes
they key into an index file linearly, like for stored fields and
term vectors index files, but other times they are encoded eg in the
posting lists.
Mike
Cam Bazz wrote:
Yes, I have found. however it is not for reqular
Cam Bazz wrote:
Yes, I noticed
http://www.archivum.info/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2006-09/
msg00065.html
Somehow I gotta do my delete within the same writer. I could use
another
field that combines both src and dst field, and use this field without
storing but still a waste of resources.
I
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 02:22 -0800, Michael Busch wrote:
Is your default operator AND or OR?
AND
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, then Yonik might be right about the multi-level skiplists code which
is new in 2.2. I'd love to see the performance numbers of the same index
built with 2.3, if possible? You could simply migrate it to 2.3 by using
IndexWriter.addIndexes().
In my performance tests (LUCENE-866) I measured an
hey i m encountering this error...while compiling lucene 2.2.0
Buildfile: build.xml
javacc-uptodate-check:
javacc-notice:
init:
clover.setup:
clover.info:
[echo]
[echo] Clover not found. Code coverage reports disabled.
[echo]
clover:
common.compile-core:
[mkdir] Created
Well, I cant seem to even get past the assertions of this code.
The first assertion is failing in that I get 0 hits. I am using
SimpleAnalyzer since I do not have a FrenchAnalyzer.
Any thoughts?
Srikant
Fabrice Robini wrote:
Yes, I do not see an effect...
Here is my unit test that test it:
Oooops sorry, bad cut/paste...
Here is the right one :-)
public void testFairSimilarity() throws CorruptIndexException,
IOException, ParseException
{
Directory theDirectory = new RAMDirectory();
Analyzer theAnalyzer = new StandardAnalyzer();
IndexWriter
Hello,
Could someone show me a concrete example of how to use HitCollector?
I have documents which have a field category. When I run a query, I need to
sort results by category as well as count how many hits are there for a
given category.
I understand:
searcher.search(Query, new HitCollector()
The bitset thing is just an example of a trivial operation in a
HitCollector. You'll want to do something like use TermDocs/TermEnum
to see what category your document is in and add it to some counts
you use rather than just add something to a bitset. Or see the idea
at the end of this mail.
That
OK, got it to work. Thanks.
By a quick scoring comparision, I got the same scores for both hits.
Maybe there is a loss of precision somewhere. Or when scores are equal,
Lucene is doing something unintended/overlooked and thus putting shorter
documents higher as the experiment is a special
Hi Lucene Guys,
As I see in the Lucene web site in file formats page the version 2.3
will have some changes in file formats that are very important for us.
First I will say what we do and then will ask my questions.
We distribute the index on some machines. The implementation is made so
Hi Srikant,
I really thank you for your reply, it's very interesting.
I have to say I am confused with that now...
I do not know what I can to for passing this Unit test...
I agree with you, it may be an issue of computing relevance.
Fabrice
Srikant Jakilinki-3 wrote:
OK, got it to work.
unsuscribe
java-user@lucene.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ivan Vasilev wrote:
Hi Lucene Guys,
As I see in the Lucene web site in file formats page the version
2.3 will have some changes in file formats that are very important
for us. First I will say what we do and then will ask my questions.
We distribute the index on some machines. The
Hi all,
Yesterday I sent an email to this group querying about some very important
(to me...) features of Lucene. I'm giving it another chance before it goes
unnoticed or forgotten. If it was too long please let me know and I will
email a shorter list of questions
The original post can be
On Dienstag, 22. Januar 2008, Fabrice Robini wrote:
Oooops sorry, bad cut/paste...
Here is the right one :-)
The score is the same, so documents with a lower id (inserted earlier) will
be returned first. So everything looks okay to me, or am I missing
something?
regards
Daniel
--
Hi Itamar,
In another thread, you wrote:
Yesterday I sent an email to this group querying about some
very important (to me...) features of Lucene. I'm giving it
another chance before it goes unnoticed or forgotten. If it
was too long please let me know and I will email a shorter
list of
On Jan 22, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
2) How would I set the boosts for the headers and footnotes?
I'd rather have it stored within the index file than have to
append it to each and every query I will execute, but I'm
open to suggestions. I'm more interested in performance and
Hi,
I just noticed that although the Javadocs for Lucene 2.2 state that the dates
for DateTools use UTC as a timezone, they are actually using GMT.
Should either the Javadocs be corrected or the code corrected to use UTC
instead.
Antony
On 01/22/2008 at 8:49 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
On 01/21/2008 at 2:59 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
2) How would I set the boosts for the headers and footnotes?
I'd rather have it stored within the index file than have to
append it to
Hi,
I am using Compass with Spring and JPA. It works pretty nice. I don't store
index into database, I use traditional file system based Lucene index.
Updates work very well but you have to be careful about proper mapping of
your objects into search engine (specially parent-child mappings).
26 matches
Mail list logo
