;
> > I'd like to share what I've got for 1 and 3, based on S3 and DynamoDB,
> but
> > I'd like to do it with interfaces that lend themselves to other
> > implementations for blob and metadata storage.
> >
> > Is it worth opening a Jira issue for this? Is this
https://lucene.apache.org/core/7_6_0/memory/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/MemoryIndex.html
Anton
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:06 AM Valentin Popov
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I need implement a feature, that answer for a question: is a Document
> match a Query.
>
> Right no
Which version of Lucene are you using?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valentin Popov
wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> We have ~10 indexes for 500M documents, each document has «archive date»,
> and «to» address, one of our task is calculate statistics of «to» for last
>
) text docs.
I guess I could go through the code myself to understand this but may be
someone can shed some light on this.
Thanks!
Anton
Are you sure you are not holding open readers somewhere?
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Marcio Napoli
wrote:
> Hey! :)
>
> It seems IndexWriter is not closing the descriptors of the removed files,
> see the log below.
>
> Thanks,
> Napoli
>
> [root@server01 log]# ls
You can always throw an exception in the collector to stop the collection
process.
Anton
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Muhammad Ismail it.is.ism...@gmail.com
wrote:
Can we skip matching lucene document by using custom collector or some
other way. Like I want to bring all document created
advice.
Regards,
Anton
2015-06-16 0:35 GMT+03:00 Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com:
Hi Anton,
Thanks for reporting this. It is indeed a bit surprising given that
both classes work in a very similar way. Can you confirm that the
response times that you are reporting both happen on Lucene 5.2
Hi,
I have performance issues with CachingWrapperQuery with lucene 5.2 and
dont know how to solve it.
Prehistory:
I have search with different parameters, where some parameters are used
more frequently then others. For these params I used filters(and cached
them), and my search looked
();
fieldsReader.visitDocument(i, visitor);
visitor.getDocument();
}
}
I was wondering if there is better way of doing this and if there are plans
to make access to the faster document loading through some API. Should I
try to come up with a patch for this?
Thanks!
Anton
Reindexing. If I want to add new fields or change existing fields in the
index I need to go through all documents of the index.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Anton Zenkov azen...@crimsonhexagon.com
wrote:
for (int i = 0
Hi
I have tried to upgrade lucene from 4.x to 5.0 recently.I found out from
documentation that FieldCache is removed from lucene 5, and I should use
DocValues fields for sorting.
I upgraded my sources, and everything works fine except spatial sorting by
distance.
When I looked into
the hit.
3) How do I display the sentence before and after the sentence the hit
is in?
Cherrs
anton
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I wrote a program that make a pdf document to an Lucene document. The
field ate contents, sentence, :
How do i display the sentence the query String is in? and how do I
Highlight the String?
cheers
anton feldmann
package de.coli.seek.lucene;
import java.io.File;
import
, how I have to change the IndexFile, whether that
conforms with the Lucene Team.
cheers
anton feldmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What be way for clusterizations of searching?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good grouping by domain realized in nutch... Nutch can serve good example of
group on certain field.
-Original Message-
From: Java Programmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 3:56 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Grouping results by choosen field
On
for 1.644 sec.
Second way return results fot 3.088 sec.
Why first way faster then second?
Can I accelerate it? And how? Can you offer any ways for get number of
results?
--CountCollector
import org.apache.lucene.search.HitCollector;
/**
* @author Anton Potekhin
* @date: 03.03.2006
of
queries are you issuing? Even 1.6 seconds is a LONG time for a
search in most Lucene indexes.
Erik
On Mar 10, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Anton Potehin wrote:
I try 2 way for get count results:
1)
Query q =
IndexSearcher is =
int count = Is.search(q).length();
2)
Query q
documents in your index and what kind of
queries are you issuing? Even 1.6 seconds is a LONG time for a
search in most Lucene indexes.
Erik
On Mar 10, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Anton Potehin wrote:
I try 2 way for get count results:
1)
Query q =
IndexSearcher is =
int count
documents in your index and what kind of
queries are you issuing? Even 1.6 seconds is a LONG time for a
search in most Lucene indexes.
Erik
On Mar 10, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Anton Potehin wrote:
I try 2 way for get count results:
1)
Query q =
IndexSearcher
Each variant started in different process
-Original Message-
From: Eric Jain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 5:15 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: speed
Importance: High
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I make search I get count = 37.
May be
Sorry. I was repeated test. And now both way have same speed.
-Original Message-
From: Anton Potehin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 1:39 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: speed
Importance: High
I try 2 way for get count results:
1)
Query q
was repeated test. And now both way have same speed.
-Original Message-
From: Anton Potehin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 1:39 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: speed
Importance: High
I try 2 way for get count results:
1)
Query q =
IndexSearcher
Signifies this that method collect can be called for document with score =
0 ?
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 6:35 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Get only count
Importance: High
On 3/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it possible to make search among results of previous search?
For example: I made search:
Searcher searcher =...
Query query = ...
Hits hits =
hits = Searcher.search(query);
After it I want to not make a new search, I want to make search among found
);
-Original Message-
From: hu andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 12:40 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: sub search
Importance: High
2006/3/7, Anton Potehin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is it possible to make search among results of previous search
Importance: High
Anton Potehin wrote:
Now I create new search for get number of results. For example:
IndexSearcher is = ...
Query q = ...
numberOfResults = Is.search(q).length();
Can I accelerate this example ? And how ?
Perhaps something like:
class CountingHitCollector
implements
Importance: High
Anton Potehin wrote:
Now I create new search for get number of results. For example:
IndexSearcher is = ...
Query q = ...
numberOfResults = Is.search(q).length();
Can I accelerate this example ? And how ?
Perhaps something like:
class CountingHitCollector
implements
Can have matching document score equals zero ?
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 6:20 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Get only count
Importance: High
On 3/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While
Can have matching document score equals zero ?
-Original Message-
From: Yonik Seeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 6:20 PM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Get only count
Importance: High
On 3/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While
2) assuming what you want is not all brands and all prices, but just the
prices and brands of the documents in you results, then i would strongly
recommend doing your search twice -- once do get the Hits object you need
and once using a HitCollector. Within the HitCollector, use FieldCaches
to
maxBufferedDocs parameters. You can also look for my article about indexing
with Lucene (link in the Wiki), which includes code for playing with various
parameters and explains what's going on, etc.
Sorry, but where this link ?
maxBufferedDocs parameters. You can also look for my article about indexing
with Lucene (link in the Wiki), which includes code for playing with various
parameters and explains what's going on, etc.
Sorry, but where this link ?
Where placed your article ? Please, give me url.
Is it possible to add records into lucene index using following
algorithm:
1) create Document object
2) add 5 fields into Document (id, name, field1, field2, field3). All
fields are stored, indexed and tokenized
3) check if the document with current id and name was added before
4) if yes
I've the following problem:
I've a big number of documents indexed.
Suppose that the search query contains 20 terms. It is necessary to find
all documents which contains at least 5 terms from search query.
Is it possible to implement? If yes, what problems may arise during the
solving of
About stemmers you can read on http://snowball.tartarus.org/
-Original Message-
From: Koji Sekiguchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 2:37 AM
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: What is stemming?
Gekkokid, Daniel, Giovanni,
Thank you very much for
36 matches
Mail list logo