On Monday 02 May 2005 06:01, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I can't say whats actually ready, but I am very interested in sparse
filter representations. I'm working on a project that needs to
dynamic categorization of search results, and this requires caching
thousands of filters.
The need for many
I can't say whats actually ready, but I am very interested in sparse
filter representations. I'm working on a project that needs to
dynamic categorization of search results, and this requires caching
thousands of filters.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32965
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: maandag 25 april 2005 17:48
Aan: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Onderwerp: Re: CVS Lucene 2.0
On Apr 25, 2005, at 8:08 AM, Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men wrote:
Is the sourcecode of Lucene 2.0 accessable? I have looked on the site,
but I couldn`t find a link
Term.field is interned, so equals() isn't needed.
-Yonik
On 4/26/05, Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Term other = (Term) o;
return field.equals(other.field)
text.equals(other.text);
}
Third: if the field values of refer to
I don't think at this point anything structural has been proposed as
different between 1.9 and 2.0.
Are any of Paul Elschot's query and scorer changes being considered for 2.0?
-Yonik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Is the sourcecode of Lucene 2.0 accessable? I have looked on the site,
but I couldn`t find a link.
And where are the archived mailinglists? They where of great value to
me.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Peter Veentjer
Anchor Men Interactive Solutions - duidelijk in zakelijke
internetoplossingen
: CVS Lucene 2.0
On Apr 25, 2005, at 8:08 AM, Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men wrote:
Is the sourcecode of Lucene 2.0 accessable? I have looked on the site,
but I couldn`t find a link.
There has been no binary release of it. The codebase available from
Subversion checkout and easily built with Ant
FYI... I'm working on the build process to include the contrib
libraries at this moment. Once that is done, we can move forward with
1.9 RC1 release whenever it is deemed ready.
Erik
On Apr 25, 2005, at 4:08 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
George Aroush wrote:
I would like to see a source
