[JAVA2D] ZWJ and ZWNJ

2006-07-24 Thread Peter B. West
Doug noted earlier that the implementation supports 0x200C (ZERO WIDTH NON-JOINER) and 0x200D (ZERO WIDTH JOINER). Not supported (along with ZWSP) is WORD JOINER 0x2060. I assume this means that neither will ever occupy any rendering space. What's the effect of ZWNJ and ZWJ on ligatures? Will

Re: [JAVA2D] How to do pixel based animation instead of MemoryImageSource?

2006-07-24 Thread Jim Graham
There are really 2 questions here: - How do I manipulate a BufferedImage without interfering with its ability to be accelerated under the covers? - Is there a type of image that lives in hardware accelerated memory and to which I can write directly to its pixels? To answer the first question,

Re: [JAVA2D] ZWJ and ZWNJ

2006-07-24 Thread Phil Race
I assume this means that neither will ever occupy any rendering space. It will likely depend on the font. If the font maps it to a zero width glyph then yes But if the font doesn't map it, and since JDK doesn't treat it specially, then it'll end up mapped to the missing glyph just like *any*