[JAVA2D] Performance regression in 6u10 b22

After installing b22 on two Windows machines i see a performance regression of about 15-20% on the same internal benchmark that i'm running. The benchmark is just stressing Substance look-and-feel on different control types and includes a lot of Java2D operations, composites, translucencies,

Re: [JAVA2D] Performance regression in 6u10 b22

Thanks for the report, Kirill. Could you run your app with J2D_TRACE_LEVEL=4 env. variable set on those machines and post the output? Also, could you run with -Dsun.java2d.d3d=false on both b21 and b22 and see if you still see a difference? There were a couple of fixes which could

Re: [JAVA2D] Performance regression in 6u10 b22

Hi, Dmitri The output of trace_level: [I] OS Version = OS_VISTA or newer [E] D3DPPLM::CheckForBadHardware: found matching hardware: VendorId=0x8086 DeviceId=0x [E] D3DPPLM::CheckForBadHardware: bad hardware found, device disabled [E] D3DPPLM::GDICheckForBadHardware: no suitable devices

Re: [JAVA2D] Performance regression in 6u10 b22

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Dmitri The output of trace_level: [I] OS Version = OS_VISTA or newer [E] D3DPPLM::CheckForBadHardware: found matching hardware: VendorId=0x8086 DeviceId=0x [E] D3DPPLM::CheckForBadHardware: bad hardware found, device disabled [E]

Re: [JAVA2D] Performance regression in 6u10 b22

Just forgot to mention - the main class expects two parameters. The first is the look-and-feel class name, and the second is the number of paint iterations. This is how i run it: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_10\bin\java -cp

Re: [JAVA2D] Performance regression in 6u10 b22

Running the benchmark on b21, i have results of 132, 132 and 134 ms. Running the benchmark on b22, i have results of 145, 146 and 145 ms. On another machine, the regression is from around 330ms to around 390ms. Thanks Kirill [Message sent by forum member 'kirillcool' (kirillcool)]