Re: [JAVA2D] Performance regression in 6u10 b22

2008-04-24 Thread java2d
Something even more interesting. I've ran the same performance suite on two machines, one having integrated Intel card, and another with NVidia card (from my previous reply). Both have Vista SP1 installed, both have dual-core CPU. Running the suite on integrated card takes 140ms on Substance

Re: [JAVA2D] How to draw continuious bezier cubic curves?

2008-04-24 Thread java2d
I would think that I need a function that can change the positions of the koodinates, but I also need it to move in a random track not just the same track all the time. Can anyone help me with this, please? Thank you [Message sent by forum member 'autaron' (autaron)]

Re: [JAVA2D] How to draw continuious bezier cubic curves?

2008-04-24 Thread Olsen Chris
Hello All -- After getting so much quality help while lurking (thank you all!), this might be one I can contribute some quasi-expertise. Could you be a bit more specific about your needs? E.g. what kind of random track? Please feel free to reply off-line if this problem is not of general

Re: [JAVA2D] How to draw continuious bezier cubic curves?

2008-04-24 Thread Jérôme Thièvre
You should take a look at QuadCurve2D and CubicCurve2D in package java.awt.geom. http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/awt/geom/CubicCurve2D.html http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/awt/geom/QuadCurve2D.html Jerome Thievre [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : I would think that I need a

Re: [JAVA2D] JAVA2D Huge Performance Drop from 6u5 to 6u10

2008-04-24 Thread java2d
Thanks for the advice, Do you know of any temporary workaround for this issue? and you did mention b23, is b23 going to resolve this problem? If not, it seems direct pixel manipulation is a performance killer on the new pipeline so is some kind of a fix being planned for future releases ? Is it

Re: [JAVA2D] Performance regression in 6u10 b22

2008-04-24 Thread java2d
What I find amusing is that the integrated card yielded better performance than your NVidia card. Doesn't that sounds weird to anyone else? [Message sent by forum member 'cowwoc' (cowwoc)] http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=270988

Re: [JAVA2D] Performance regression in 6u10 b22

2008-04-24 Thread Dmitri Trembovetski
Could you run the benchmark on the same system with nvidia with and w/o your fix, with -Dsun.java2d.trace=count parameter and post the results? Thanks, Dmitri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Then in theory it should be fast once the cache is filled since images can be cached in textures-

Re: [JAVA2D] Performance regression in 6u10 b22

2008-04-24 Thread java2d
Will do in the evening. Thanks Kirill [Message sent by forum member 'kirillcool' (kirillcool)] http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=271046 === To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the

Re: [JAVA2D] Performance regression in 6u10 b22

2008-04-24 Thread java2d
What I find amusing is that the integrated card yielded better performance than your NVidia card. Doesn't that sounds weird to anyone else? On Linux thats a usual case for 2D. Drivers available are quite poor, and also the frameworks for 2D accaleration are not that well tuned, so you get

Re: [JAVA2D] Performance regression in 6u10 b22

2008-04-24 Thread java2d
Results of running this benchmark under Nimbus (6u10, b22): 810 calls to D3DDrawLine 19290 calls to sun.java2d.d3d.D3DRTTSurfaceToSurfaceBlit::Blit(D3D Surface (render-to-texture), An yAlpha, D3D Surface) 90 calls to sun.java2d.d3d.D3DSurfaceToSwBlit::Blit(D3D Surface, SrcNoEa, IntArgb) 25050