Bugs item #532734, was opened at 2002-03-20 22:17
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=532734group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marius Kotsbak (mkotsbak)
Assigned to:
Hi Jason,
Sorry for the delay. If I'd just hung around 15 mins :-)
The full path is
/cvsroot/jboss/contrib/jetty/src/main/org/mortbay/jetty/jmx
The locks are held by anoncvs_jboss and maximal
Regards,
Adrian
Can you tell me what the full paths are that are
locked.
--jason
Adrian
on 23-03-2 03.23, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just looking through this, answered a couple, but damn this is a
mess... not really what I expected to find under a FAQ listing... its
half FAQ-like entries and then half lame user questions...
I deployed a big fat war called
Jan how I love you.
That fixed it. I was trying to write a repro case as Scott asked, but
haven't been able to get the same behaviour. I prepared a servlet that was
registered in jbosstest-web and reproduced my situation but I wasn't able to
get my same bug.
Your fix worked, instead. Thanks a
IANACVSE - I am not a CVS expert :-)
It is correct that I can tag later if I keep
CVS snapshots before and after my commit?
Regards,
Adrian
Hi Jason,
Sorry for the delay. If I'd just hung around 15 mins
:-)
The full path is
/cvsroot/jboss/contrib/jetty/src/main/org/mortbay/jett
/jmx
No. You can tag latter by date or version. Tagging
does not work on the working directory so you can't
just tag your local copy.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Brock [EMAIL
Thanks Scott,
I'll wait for the locks to go away.
Regards,
Adrian
No. You can tag latter by date or version. Tagging
does not work on the working directory so you can't
just tag your local copy.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Jason Dillon wrote:
I was just looking through this, answered a couple, but damn this is a
mess... not really what I expected to find under a FAQ listing... its
half FAQ-like entries and then half lame user questions...
=(
There's no real information structure to a FAQ forum, so I
I've got just over 40 source modifications.
Is it acceptable to tag individually using a
non Rel_3_* tag?
I can do the tagging by hand on individual sources.
Alternatively, I could just commit the changes.
There are already java 1.4 users using jbossmx with
jboss3 to solve the jsr77 problem,
What is the purpose of the tag your trying to apply? If
your trying to define snaphosts before and after a move
to the JBossMX JMX implementation this can be done
after the fact using tags based on timestamps. The lastest
checkin was at Mar 22, 2002 8:55 PM PST. You can use the
rtag command to
Hi Scott,
I didn't think the local tags would be very useful,
except to me if I had to reverse the mod on individual
sources.
Yes, I am trying to get a before and after snapshot.
Perhaps I should just stop worrying about it and
keep a diff in a safe place.
Regards,
Adrian
What is the
Hi, I'm done..
I'm attaching the diff right now.
The one major thing that changed is that the oswego-concurrent.jar must now
be in the client's classpath also. The diff includes an udpate to the
build.xml so that it gets placed in the /client directory.
Regards,
Hiram
From: Andreas
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:10:59
Modified:src/main/org/jbossmx/cluster/watchdog/mbean Watchdog.java
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +1 -5
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:10:59
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.32 +9 -9 jbossmx/build.xml
Index:
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:00
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/util/jmx MBeanProxy.java
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +99 -3
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:10:59
Modified:src/main/org/jbossmx/cluster/watchdog/agent BaseAgent.java
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +35
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:00
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.33 +9 -9 jbosscx/build.xml
Index:
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:01
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.30 +21 -1 jmx/build.xml
Index:
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:00
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +9 -9 jboss-ejb/build.xml
Index:
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:02
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb EjbModule.java
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +40 -10
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:04
Modified:src/resources/naming/ear/a/META-INF ejb-jar.xml jboss.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -0
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:01
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +9 -9 jboss-management/build.xml
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:02
Modified:src/etc/manifest connector-client-factory.mf deploy.mf
ejb-connector-client.mf ejb-connector.mf
rmi-adaptor.mf rmi-connector-client.mf stop.mf
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:01
Modified:jboss.net/testsuite/src/bin testAxis.bat
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:01
Modified:jettybuild.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.47 +8 -8 contrib/jetty/build.xml
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:04
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/naming/test EjbLinkUnitTestCase.java
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.2
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:10:59
Modified:jbossbuild.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.111 +14 -21build/jboss/build.xml
Index:
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:03
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +9 -9 jboss-system/build.xml
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:02
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +9 -9 jbosspool/build.xml
Index:
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:03
Modified:src/etc manifest.mf
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1 jbosstest/src/etc/manifest.mf
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:00
Modified:src/main/org/jbossmx/cluster/watchdog/mbean/xmlet
XMLetMetaDataNodeProcessor.java
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:10:59
Modified:catalina build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +9 -9 contrib/catalina/build.xml
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:10:59
Modified:src/main/org/jbossmx/cluster/watchdog SwapMachines.java
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -2
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:00
Modified:iiop build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +9 -9 contrib/iiop/build.xml
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:00
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +9 -9 jboss-common/build.xml
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:03
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/jmx/connector/notification
PollingClientNotificationListener.java
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:00
Modified:jboss.net build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +9 -9 contrib/jboss.net/build.xml
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:02
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.80 +13 -9 jboss/build.xml
Index:
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:01
Modified:jboss.net/testsuite build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +9 -9
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:02
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +9 -9 jbosssx/build.xml
Index:
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:01
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +9 -9 jbossmq/build.xml
Index:
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:03
Modified:src/main/org/jboss Main.java
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +9 -2
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:02
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mq/sm/file OldStateManager.java
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -8
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:03
Modified:src/bin jmx-test.sh
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +2 -2 jbosstest/src/bin/jmx-test.sh
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:03
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system/server ServerLoader.java
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +9 -2
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:03
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.96 +13 -108 jbosstest/build.xml
Index:
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:04
Modified:src/resources/naming/ear/b/META-INF ejb-jar.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +21 -0
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/23 13:11:04
Modified:variabuild.xml
Log:
JBoss/JBossMX integration. Also includes a fix to the cluster tests and a more
complete ejblink test that currently fails
Revision ChangesPath
1.27 +9 -9 contrib/varia/build.xml
What will JDK 1.4's non-blocking i/o do for the scalability of a single
machine when the appserver takes full advantage?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Ok,
JBoss now builds and runs with JBossMX.
I'll post other issues in different threads. Sorry for
the mail bombing, but I hate interlocking threads with
5 or 6 different topics.
Since I'm posting from the forums, my direct mail
address for any problems is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
any means jbossmx
Hi,
I fixed the clustering tests that weren't deploying.
I've also made a few mods where MBeanServer.invoke()
was used to get/set attributes.
I don't know enough to test this properly.
I did cluster my Windows laptop and my Linux desktop
using the bean from the testsuite.
Cool stuff guys!
Hey,
|Apache's stated mission is to foster collaborative development and
|distribution of open-source software. JBoss Group has shown impressive
|technical capability and more importantly the ability to work and
|collaborate as a team. Consequently, I believe that JBoss could be an
|excellent
And for the thousands fucking time please send me your BIO and picture for
the site
PLEASE! it's been what... 2 month?
come'on you earned it already!
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Adrian Brock
|Sent: Saturday, March
Hi,
I've changed these modules to build with jbossmx.
Let me know if there are any problems.
I also changed a .bat test program in axis that looked
like they hadn't been modified since the alpha.
Regards,
Adrian
_
View thread online:
So far I've split out the basic jmx services.
There's plenty of other bits I can move from
core to services, e.g. QueryExp
It just needs some testing and maybe some minor code
changes.
If we really wanted to provide a minimal kernel,
Standard and ModelMBeans are really services
on top of the
Hi,
There are couple of features that JBoss could use.
1) UnifiedLoaderRepository.
2) BCEL compilation of Standard MBeans to get near
Dynamic MBean performance.
It is probably best to speak to Juha about these.
Regards,
Adrian
_
View
|1) UnifiedLoaderRepository.
We will do that at Tahoe,
|2) BCEL compilation of Standard MBeans to get near
|Dynamic MBean performance.
ummm I think we could use it in the invocation chain to call the target,
this way we would speed up the invocation chain on JDK1.3. Supposedly
JDK1.4 has an
At 14:02 23.03.2002 -0800, marc fleury wrote:
The interview states very clearly where I stand...
Actually, your comments in the interview came though like an unwarranted
attack against Jakarta whereas now your concern seems to be focused on the
business model which is a very legitimate concern.
There is a standalone checkout of JBossMQ that is
still using jmxri.jar
Part of the reason for doing the integration is to stop
developers using invoke() to get/set attributes.
Something that should never have been allowed and will be
stopped in the RI from JMX1.1
I can modify this, but it
|1) UnifiedLoaderRepository.
We will do that at Tahoe,
|2) BCEL compilation of Standard MBeans to get near
|Dynamic MBean performance.
ummm I think we could use it in the invocation chain
to call the target,
this way we would speed up the invocation chain on
JDK1.3. Supposedly
And for the thousands fucking time please send me
your BIO and picture for
the site
PLEASE! it's been what... 2 month?
I suppose you don't want to hear it is the only
outstanding item in my e-mails ;-)
I'm tempted to send you a Silhouette with a ?
PS. England thrashed Wales, but
|The interview states very clearly where I stand...
|
|Actually, your comments in the interview came though like an unwarranted
|attack against Jakarta whereas now your concern seems to be focused on the
|business model which is a very legitimate concern.
I am sorry if the interview ruffled some
Change Notes item #534166, was opened at 2002-03-24 00:12
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=534166group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Adrian Brock (ejort)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Bugs item #525412, was opened at 2002-03-04 07:47
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=525412group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Assigned to:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 540
Successful tests: 512
Errors:24
Failures: 4
[time of test: 24 March 2002 1:3 GMT]
[java.version:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 547
Successful tests: 521
Errors:22
Failures: 4
[time of test: 24 March 2002 1:50 GMT]
[java.version:
User: schaefera
Date: 02/03/23 18:25:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/management/mejb
ClientNotificationListener.java ManagementBean.java
RMIClientNotificationListener.java
Log:
Fixed a problem with the RMINotificationListener and wrong
User: schaefera
Date: 02/03/23 18:25:05
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Fixed a problem with the RMINotificationListener and wrong numbering of
the State in StateManageable found by Dirk Laessig (thanx).
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +2 -1
User: schaefera
Date: 02/03/23 18:25:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/management/j2ee J2EEDeployedObject.java
J2EEManagedObject.java StateManageable.java
StateManagement.java
Log:
Fixed a problem with the RMINotificationListener and
User: schaefera
Date: 02/03/23 18:25:05
Modified:src/main/javax/management/j2ee Management.java
Log:
Fixed a problem with the RMINotificationListener and wrong numbering of
the State in StateManageable found by Dirk Laessig (thanx).
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +4
User: schaefera
Date: 02/03/23 18:27:49
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/management/test
JSR77SpecUnitTestCase.java
Log:
getLog() in inner class listener fails at runtime therefore removed but
brought the Notification Listener test back in after the fixes.
User: schaefera
Date: 02/03/23 18:27:49
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
getLog() in inner class listener fails at runtime therefore removed but
brought the Notification Listener test back in after the fixes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.97 +8 -9
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 547
Successful tests: 522
Errors:22
Failures: 3
[time of test: 24 March 2002 2:37 GMT]
[java.version:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 547
Successful tests: 522
Errors:22
Failures: 3
[time of test: 24 March 2002 4:11 GMT]
[java.version:
Yes please modify. The standalone JBossMQ should run under the same
enviorment that the integrated one does. So if JBoss is making the switch
to JBossMX, JBossMQ should do the same also. Makes maintenance easier.
Regards,
Hiram
From: Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/23 21:35:01
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Moved mbean xml config processing entirely into ServiceConfigurator and added nested
mbean configuration processing. Made a couple more mbean interfaces xdoclet generated
Revision ChangesPath
1.10
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/23 21:35:01
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/jmx/test
DeployServiceUnitTestCase.java
Log:
Moved mbean xml config processing entirely into ServiceConfigurator and added nested
mbean configuration processing. Made a couple more
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/23 21:35:01
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment SARDeployer.java
Removed: src/main/org/jboss/deployment SARDeployerMBean.java
Log:
Moved mbean xml config processing entirely into ServiceConfigurator and added nested
mbean configuration
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/03/23 21:35:01
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system ServiceConfigurator.java
ServiceContext.java ServiceController.java
Removed: src/main/org/jboss/system ServiceControllerMBean.java
Log:
Moved mbean xml config processing entirely
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 538
Successful tests: 510
Errors:23
Failures: 5
[time of test: 24 March 2002 5:50 GMT]
[java.version:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 540
Successful tests: 512
Errors:24
Failures: 4
[time of test: 24 March 2002 7:9 GMT]
[java.version:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 547
Successful tests: 519
Errors:25
Failures: 3
[time of test: 24 March 2002 7:59 GMT]
[java.version:
82 matches
Mail list logo
