Bugs item #630665, was opened at 2002-10-29 21:32
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=630665group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Leon Doud (ldoud)
Assigned to:
hi,
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 22:36, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
(Don't know much about XML Schemasmaybe they address these issues?)
This is what XML name spaces are for. If in ISV wants to add more
config options to jboss, if jboss wants to add new options to the spec
ejb-jar.xml file, we
onsdagen den 13 november 2002 kl 23.56 skrev Dain Sundstrom:
public interface MetaDataRepository {
MetaDataRepository getParent();
void setParent(MetaDataRepository parent);
Object get(Object attributeKey);
void set(Object attributeKey, Object value);
}
maybe add
void
Hi Dennis,
I've thought about this too.
I thought about invocation valves (buffering up requests until you are
ready to process them - an idea from the JBoss camp), but then ended up
thinking more like you.
Invocation valves are probably the natural way to go in e.g. standalone
Jetty.
one more thought
This is a little complicated by session state and sticky load-balancing.
I guess in this case, if a redeployment is occurring the LB will either
end up waiting on the context to reappear and all it's sticky requests
will be queued, or the context will remain listed in the
Hi,
have any one of you looked at XmlBlaster? (www.xmlBlaster.org).
I guess it could really work as a central XmlRepository. XmlBlaster is
an XML based MOM. You publish your XML to it and it will save it in an
Xml DOM tree, even persist it a RDMB or Xincice.
You can then subscribe to event with
Bugs item #636920, was opened at 2002-11-12 02:32
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=636920group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff Miner (jeff_miner)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #636920, was opened at 2002-11-12 02:32
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=636920group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff Miner (jeff_miner)
Assigned to:
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 08:10 pm, David Jencks wrote:
What is the bug and why does this patch change anything? Why do you think
it won't cause equal and opposite bugs with other drivers?
I haven't tested actual drivers extensively but have always assumed
isSameRM was intended to be
--- Christian Riege [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 22:36, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
(Don't know much about XML Schemasmaybe they
address these issues?)
This is what XML name spaces are for. If in ISV
wants to add more
config options to jboss, if jboss wants
Dain,
and the worst part is we have no control over it at runtime. It is way
simpler. You'll see.
It sounds like you have a vision. Please continue to make the effort to get
the rest of us into the loop. I want to see also, but I'd prefer to do so
sooner rather than later (not after it's
Wow Peter! This is exactly what I was thinking of. Any JMX guys have any
ideas how we could integrate this?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Peter
Antman
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 4:12 AM
Jason, we're not talking about one file on disk. We're talking about in
memory...(well that's at least what I'm talking about).
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi Matt,
Given an instance where a company would place a server on its intranet
(behind a firewall that does not allow incoming connections from the
internet).
Now, If this company wanted to receive periodic updates to some
semi-static data (iso country codes for instance) from a source on
Dain,
Chill on the metadata repository. This is a significant change to JBoss and
you have not thought through all the issues. (Notification, persistence, JMX
integation, etc...) David is right, we really need to flush out the
usecases for this and how it will help the system and effect it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 12:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MetaDataRepository Proposal
Hiram Chirino wrote:
David,
Jason,
Well, you've peaked my interest...
This method(with digital signatures/encryption) would be more secure
than the Http(s) transport,
Really? Any articles on the subject?
Authentication would be near definite
(rather hard to fake),
Is there something in the mail protocol that
On 14 Nov, Bill Burke wrote:
Wow Peter! This is exactly what I was thinking of. Any JMX guys have any
ideas how we could integrate this?
The server is already integrated:
http://www.xmlBlaster.org/xmlBlaster/doc/requirements/j2ee.jmx.html
There is also an JCA RA adaper if one want's to use
Bugs item #638488, was opened at 2002-11-14 08:14
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=638488group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeremy Boynes (jboynes)
Assigned to:
Patches item #638520, was opened at 2002-11-14 08:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=638520group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeremy Boynes (jboynes)
Assigned to:
Ok, when I was doing ECPerf tests, I was trying anything to squeak out
better performance. Here's where the PooledInvoker came in. The idea is to
pool connections at the remote client as well as pool threads/connections on
the server side.
So, when a remote client first connects, the server
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 08:55 AM, Matt Munz wrote:
Jason,
Well, you've peaked my interest...
This method(with digital signatures/encryption) would be more secure
than the Http(s) transport,
Really? Any articles on the subject?
Using digital signatures / xml encryption
Jason,
You rock. Thanks. I have a much better understanding now of why it helps
to have this tool in the toolbox.
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Jason
Essington
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002
Bill Burke wrote:
Dain,
Chill on the metadata repository. This is a significant change to
JBoss and you have not thought through all the issues. (Notification,
persistence, JMX integation, etc...) David is right, we really need
to flush out the usecases for this and how it will help the
Bill Burke wrote:
In all honesty Dain, I don't think this is a simplification. And Hiram's
right. Attaching interfaces with the aspect framework should give you the
functionality you want here of adding read-ahead apis. How would it get
into the invocation? EasilyIts just another
Peter Fagerlund wrote:
onsdagen den 13 november 2002 kl 23.56 skrev Dain Sundstrom:
public interface MetaDataRepository {
MetaDataRepository getParent();
void setParent(MetaDataRepository parent);
Object get(Object attributeKey);
void set(Object attributeKey, Object value);
}
Matt Munz wrote:
and the worst part is we have no control over it at runtime. It is
way simpler. You'll see.
It sounds like you have a vision. Please continue to make the effort
to get the rest of us into the loop. I want to see also, but I'd
prefer to do so sooner rather than later
JBOSS 3.2 CVS (Last night) Linux 2.2 / JVM 1.3.1/Blackdown
I am testing the http to deploy an ear.
Deploy ..
lynx -dump
this is one of the features we are working on for the rewrite
marc f
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net] On
Behalf Of Lennart Petersson
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 2:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
we may start an eclipse on jboss project soon, I am still looking for
the natural leader in that space.
Please put this in the patches in the meantime and watch the online
space from time to time
marc f
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
he he lol
marc f
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net] On
Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] article about cache - local/global
Did
Bugs item #633392, was opened at 2002-11-04 18:57
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=633392group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simo Arajarvi (simo22)
Assigned to:
great,
scenario. The PooledInvoker is 300% faster than the default
RMI Invoker.
2nd scenario:
invokor is 30% faster than the default RMI based invoker.
P.S. This code is extremely more simple than the Trunk
Invoker and I've been told that the Trunk Invoker provides no
performance
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 1:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MetaDataRepository Proposal
Matt Munz wrote:
and the worst
Bill Burke wrote:
We can just throw away any code I add later. It won't take very long..
What I am suggesting is a fairly small change. You guys are just
getting way to excited about repository implementation details. I just
I'm not focusing on implementation details, just throwing in
Bugs item #633392, was opened at 2002-11-04 09:57
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=633392group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simo Arajarvi (simo22)
Assigned to:
please dain, take the new development of the CMP on JBoss online. If
there is a rewrite, put it online, share the docs for the design, let us
know how you want the site to look and feel and we will do it.
Explore new grounds of collaborative development
marc f
xx
Marc
Bugs item #637880, was opened at 2002-11-13 11:47
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=637880group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jim Snyder (jdsnyderii)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #558052, was opened at 2002-05-19 19:32
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=558052group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bogdan Ghidireac (ghidi)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #574130, was opened at 2002-06-26 08:29
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=574130group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Rejected
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jon Swinth (jswinth)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #636920, was opened at 2002-11-12 02:32
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=636920group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeff Miner (jeff_miner)
Assigned to:
Hi,
when capturing the RMI wire protocol of the
client/jboss traffic I find that the stream
has a 0x0002 as version whereas the spec of
the 1.4.0 I used only talks about 0x0001.
Anybody out there knows a pointer to an updated
spec with version 0x0002?
Regards,
Michael
Patches item #638718, was opened at 2002-11-14 14:48
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=638718group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Randy Shoup (rshoup)
Assigned to:
What are all of these org.jboss.test.cmp2.lob.LOBUnitTestCase failures I see in the
3.2 branch? Everyone is an NPE like the following:
null; nested exception is: java.lang.NullPointerException
javax.transaction.TransactionRolledbackException: null; nested exception is:
I've tried to run iiop tests (in 3.0.5rc1 and 3.2beta2) through the command:
./build.sh
-Dtest=org.jboss.test.helloiiop.test.HelloTimingStressTestCase one-test
but it down't work, just get a classcast exception.
i started with all conf
--
| Emerson Cargnin
Bugs item #638724, was opened at 2002-11-14 14:59
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=638724group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Randy Shoup (rshoup)
Assigned to:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Bill Burke wrote:
IMHO, JMX is limiting. MBeans are declarations of object instances.
standardjboss.xml, standardcmp-jdbc.xml, the new aspect configs,
etc... are templates/defaultconfigs for object
creations/instantiations. A major difference.
Sometimes
The DeployConnectionManagerUnitTestCase is failing in 3.2 with the following NPE
Please look into what the issue is here.
15:10:46,518 INFO [MainDeployer] Deployed package: file:/C:/usr/JBoss3.2/jboss-
3.2/testsuite/output/lib/jmxtest.jar
15:10:46,788 INFO [JBossManagedConnectionPool] Creating
This is one of my tests, which was working a few of weeks ago when I
checked it in.
I'll look into it tonight (ie. in about ten hours time) and try and
figure out what has happened to it.
Have any of the other cmp2 tests been changed recently?
Steve Coy
On Friday, November 15, 2002, at
Please, share the vision.
I would like to contribute here but don't know where to start as it seems
everything might be changing.
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of marc
fleury
Sent: Thursday, November 14,
+1
- Original Message -
From: Lennart Petersson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] new forums for development
Looks good. Any news about nntp gateway?
/Love mail and news - hate browsers :)
tisdagen den 12
Number of tests run: 1028
Successful tests: 1002
Errors:23
Failures: 3
[time of test: 2002-11-15.04-28 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_05]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
These results are now available on our website Look into the errors that may
be in your areas and try to address them for the beta2 release early next week.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From:
The cool thing about a signed secure e-mail message is that you get
non-repudiation. If at a later time company B tells company A, hey I never
sent you a Purchase Order for 1 million widgets.. company A can show them
the signed secure e-mail message that they received the PO in. It would be
Number of tests run: 995
Successful tests: 987
Errors:8
Failures: 0
[time of test: 2002-11-14.17-59 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
I use Eclipse and jboss quite a bit. I am really interested in the deployer. Could you
please send out an email whenever you post your patches on the sf site.
thanks
prabhakar
Few months ago I wrote special deployer that knows structure
of eclipse
workspace and is able to deploy ejb's
I'll take a look, probably tonight.
david jencks
On 2002.11.14 18:21:40 -0500 Scott M Stark wrote:
The DeployConnectionManagerUnitTestCase is failing in 3.2 with the
following NPE
Please look into what the issue is here.
15:10:46,518 INFO [MainDeployer] Deployed package:
The cool thing about a signed secure e-mail message is that you get
non-repudiation. If at a later time company B tells company A, hey I
never
sent you a Purchase Order for 1 million widgets.. company A can show them
the signed secure e-mail message that they received the PO in. It would
be
Bugs item #638804, was opened at 2002-11-15 09:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=638804group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus)
Assigned to:
59 matches
Mail list logo
