Hi,
Tobias Frech wrote:
There is a interesting thread on linux threads here:
http://www.jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=52thread=2273
Yes, and it kind of exposes the confusion on this.
A few years back I did a lot of Linux kernel hacking,
so I guess I know a little about this.
It is
On 5 Okt, Ole Husgaard wrote:
Hi,
I hope it is OK that I forward your reply to the list.
David Maplesden wrote:
Sounds like a good idea. It didn't feel when writing the code that an extra
thread per connection would be a problem. If it is for you then you will
probably want to pool
Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Peter Antman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossMQ thread model
On 5 Okt, Ole Husgaard wrote:
Hi,
I hope it is OK that I forward your reply
Hi,
As most of you are probably aware, JBossMQ creates a _lot_ of
threads. This can be particularly annoying with native threads
Java VMs on Linux where threads are just processes with shared
memory and io, and where the number of operating system threads
by default are limited to 512.
I am a
There is a interesting thread on linux threads here:
http://www.jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=52thread=2273
tobi
Ole Husgaard wrote:
Hi,
As most of you are probably aware, JBossMQ creates a _lot_ of
threads. This can be particularly annoying with native threads
Java VMs on Linux
