this is great, this is today in cvs, unless a certain someone removed this
as well.
=P
The problem is a painful russian doll structure.
3- however there are 3 static directories deploy/first, deploy/second,
deploy/third, actually i could call them
deploy/deploy1, deploy/deploy2/deploy3...
?
-Original Message-
From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:53 PM
To: Bill Burke
Cc: marc fleury; Scott M Stark; Jboss-Development @ Lists . Sourceforge
. Net
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
A directory based short-term solution (which does
I don't think so. Implement one or the other but supporting both is
going to be a nightmare from a maintenance standpoint. Imagine a user
using the numbered order in a directory configuration. *shiver*
So, my point was to fix the system such that neither is needed for
deployment to function
|This can be done today simply by including the list of 3 or whatever
|directories in the URLDeploymentScanner. Jason just needs to sort each
|directory separately when he puts the sorting back in.
right, let's just do that, it is simple and will cover 99% cases.
we need to
1- document the
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
|fleury
|Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:19 AM
|To: David Jencks
|Cc: Jboss-Development @ Lists . Sourceforge . Net
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
|
|
||This can be done today
. Sourceforge . Net
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
|
|
|
|
||-Original Message-
||From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
||[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
||fleury
||Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:19 AM
||To: David Jencks
||Cc: Jboss-Development @ Lists . Sourceforge . Net
|Why doesn't depends handle this?
because
marcf
|
|--jason
|
|
|
|___
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
___
On 13 Mar, marc fleury wrote:
[...]
The problem is a painful russian doll structure.
3- however there are 3 static directories deploy/first, deploy/second,
deploy/third, actually i could call them
deploy/deploy1, deploy/deploy2/deploy3... and allow for arbitrary numbers
but we would
- Original Message -
From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Jencks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jboss-Development @ Lists . Sourceforge . Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:42 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
ok,
so i
|/etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S10network will start before /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S80sendmail
|because 10 commes before 80.
whatever,
stuff in rc2 is started before stuff in rc3
also the S10network before the S80sendmail is a convention that is actually
great, it is an explicit ordering of deployments and is
.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jboss-Development @ Lists . Sourceforge . Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
|This is using Ant as the deployment language. If the sar depends on the
|war because it is adapting a legacy protocol to soap for example, you
|would then need to repackage the above to:
|
|jar/
|---war/
|--sar
|--jar2
that is correct,
|
|I would rather see an ear as the standalone
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 8:00 AM
|To: Jboss-Development @ Lists . Sourceforge . Net
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
|
|
|Or equivalently, mirror the deploy1, deploy2
Hi,
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 16:47, marc fleury wrote:
|/etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S10network will start before /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S80sendmail
|because 10 commes before 80.
whatever,
stuff in rc2 is started before stuff in rc3
this is not correct when looked upon from the UNIX perspective. My
system
ordering you need, no?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
fleury
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 11:00 AM
To: Scott M Stark; Jboss-Development @ Lists . Sourceforge . Net
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
fleury
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:50 PM
To: Bill Burke; Scott M Stark; Jboss-Development @ Lists . Sourceforge .
Net
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
|directory solution
|I like this I'll ask the class. How many other software
|projects have the
|actual developers talking to the user base?
you moron, our user base of today will spawn our developers of tomorrow. it
is our best recruitment ground.
you should see the class, the jboss boot-camp for developers,
. Sourceforge . Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 8:35 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
directory solution is better and easier to maintain IMHO than the SXX
stuff.
My gut feeling tells me that with the SXX solution you'll constantly be
changing filenames and will create
: JBoss Dev list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 8:19 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
Hi,
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 16:47, marc fleury wrote:
|/etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S10network will start before
/etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S80sendmail
|because 10 commes before 80.
whatever
Having to nest jars in a particular manner to achieve the correct
deployment ordering certainly is not simple. Here your talking
about the static deployment directories while all of the current
issues are with self-contained deployment units of j2ee components
and services. We need a simple
This can be done today simply by including the list of 3 or whatever
directories in the URLDeploymentScanner. Jason just needs to sort each
directory separately when he puts the sorting back in.
david jencks
On 2002.03.12 21:56:01 -0500 marc fleury wrote:
ok, it is 3 am in london and i drank
Are you sure it is that hard to understand or do? Usually the default
order of peer subpackages works fine: if you want something else you can
use nesting.
I think that if we can convert jndi dependencies into mbean dependencies a
lot of problems will go away without any more deployment
. Likewise, if a service is using an
ejb or servlet how is this specified?
- Original Message -
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
Are you sure it is that hard to understand or do
deploy/first/
deploy/second/
deploy/third/
a la 'init.d/rc1-2-3'
Not such a hot idea. There was talk about this a while ago
What is the real issue here? Why doesn't the depends attribute handle it?
a bit more complex to code but would be worth it...
Does not seem like any code
Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:33 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
|
|
|
|Ordering should not be a function of the packaging. I should
|be able to create an ear with a flat
25 matches
Mail list logo
