A concern over use of BouncyCastle as a JCE provider has come up due to
its inclusion of the IDEA algorithm implementation that is subject to
patent/ip concerns. As far as I know we don't have any explicit or
implicit dependency on BouncyCastle even though it has been discussed in
the context of
] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 11:31 AM
To: jboss-development
Subject: [JBoss-dev] BouncyCastle IDEA issues
A concern over use of BouncyCastle as a JCE provider has come up due
to
its inclusion of the IDEA algorithm implementation that is subject to
patent/ip concerns
PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason T.
Greene
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:16 PM
To: JBoss.org development list
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] BouncyCastle IDEA issues
We need it to support WS-Security on jdk 4. Since, at the time of
releasing jbossws 1.0.0, we did not have
to download and install it in their JVM.
-Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 11:31 AM
To: jboss-development
Subject: [JBoss-dev] BouncyCastle IDEA issues
A concern over use
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason T. Greene
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 11:16 AM
To: JBoss.org development list
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] BouncyCastle IDEA issues
We need it to support WS-Security on jdk 4. Since, at the
time of releasing jbossws 1.0.0, we did not have a US export
, June 20, 2006 1:35 PM
To: JBoss.org development list
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] BouncyCastle IDEA issues
For what algorithms? We will not be able to bundle the full BC
capabilities regardless of export control due to the IP issues. Saying
that users have to download it is fine. We just can't
