Hello,
I am a JMX newbie, i have successfully write some standard mbean follows
the example in the Jboss docs. I plan to do some serious component using
this model, therefore i post this message to verify with you gurus and
hope to get some comments and feedbacks.
My objective of using mbean is
Here is an example for 1:1 unidirectional relationship from B to A:
In B:
/**
* @ejb.relation
*name=A-B
*role-name=B-has-A
*target-ejb=A
*target-role-name=A-belongsto-B
*target-multiple=false
* @jboss.relation
*related-pk-field=id
*
Took some time, xmas and all...
Here you go..
This application is deployed with an empty database, and fk-constraint
set to true. Using 3.2.2 this works. The primary keys are simple
(Strings and Integers).
Could it be something I do wrong?
The log file is located here:
Scott M Stark wrote:
Linkage errors indicate an inconsistent type system due to
repdeployment.
Open a bug report if you have an example that demonstrates what you
are seeing.
Few days ago, Scott, I sent to you ucl.log (19 M !) along with server.log
file, which demonstrates LinkageError
Hallo,
I run Apache2 with mod_jk2 and 3 JBoss 3.2.3 with the included Tomcat on
Suse 8.2.
When requesting to the jsp-pages in the JBoss 3.2.3 the load balancing
behavior is
not round robin. It seems to me that every time the benchmark send
requests to the
Apache2 the mod_jk2 makes a new slot
hi,
how to add/change security roles on dynamicaly created
JMS queues ?
I am creating a JMS queue using the jmx-console but
when I try to send a message, I get an exception :
13:46:56,541 WARN [OILServerILService] Client request
resulted in a server exception:
javax.jms.JMSSecurityException:
Is id (from field-name/) a field belonging to B or A? Is the a_fk (from
column-name/) column from B or A? What if the columns and fields from B
bean are totally different from A (i.e., B.weird_column_name with
B.getWeirdColumnName() maps to A.a_primary_key and a.getMyKey())? What
would the
I've received no notification from ComponentSource, and their download manager
doesn't deliver an update.
Can anyone confirm that they've received an update since 08/03?
T
snip
Message: 2
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBoss Docs
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 23:33:01 -0600
From: Scott M Stark
Hi,
I have an application which used to run on JBoss3.2.2RC3_jetty4.2.11
[JDK1.3.1_08].
Since there was some problem in clustering[(additional data) not coming]
with the above version,we had decided to move to
JBoss3.2.3RC1_jetty4.2.14[JDK1.4.2].
But in this release(3.2.3RC1),we have encountered
We need the stacktrace of the errors at least.
sacha
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nishant Aggarwal
Sent: mercredi, 31. décembre 2003 05:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] Clustering Problem in
I contacted them directly (see their Contact us) and they sent the update to
me immediately.
Original Message Follows
From: Poppe, Troy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] RE: JBoss Docs (Scott M Stark)
Date: Tue,
Hi Sacha,
Thanks for the response!
Actually ,there is no error from cluster.log as I can see from it.I
thought that the below scenario would have explained the situation. But,
nevertheless ,here's the whole problem description:
-
I am running JBoss server as a thread in my
Peter Ondruska wrote:
I contacted them directly (see their Contact us) and they sent the
update to me immediately.
We also contacted them and still waiting... :-(
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert
I have been working on a JBoss MQ Admin API. It is
still a bit rough, but 90% of it works now. I am still
working on the security stuff, of which 0% seems to
work.
Source code attached. Feel free to drop me an email if
you have any problems with it.
//Nicholas
--- Scott M Stark [EMAIL
I would say that instead of sending the update individually they are trying
to fix the problem and update will be sent afterwards.
Original Message Follows
From: Vladyslav Kosulin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] RE: JBoss Docs
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 06:59, Stephen Ting wrote:
Hello,
I am a JMX newbie, i have successfully write some standard mbean follows
the example in the Jboss docs. I plan to do some serious component using
this model, therefore i post this message to verify with you gurus and
hope to get some
I did not get the file so try zipping it up and resending it.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Svetozar Radojcin
Sent: Tue 12/30/2003 2:35 AM
To: [EMAIL
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 16:49, Adrian Brock wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 13:02, Ionel GARDAIS wrote:
hi,
how to add/change security roles on dynamicaly created
JMS queues ?
I am creating a JMS queue using the jmx-console but
when I try to send a message, I get an exception :
My guess is that the -p option on cygwin preserves the
file system permissions, but the other methods do not.
Regards,
Adrian
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 16:49, Barlow, Dustin wrote:
JBoss Version: 3.2.3
JVM: Sun 1.4.2-b28
OS: Windows 2000
Using windows explorer, I copied an unmodified all
I tried the same proceedure on WinXP prosp1 using jboss-3.2.3 and sun jdk-1.4.2_03
and I don't see this error.
09:08:58,423 INFO [MainDeployer] Starting deployment of package: file:/C:/cvs/R
eleases/jboss-3.2.3/server/foo/deploy/management/web-console.war
09:08:59,033 INFO
Just to rule that out, I did a cp -Rv all foo and the server comes up
fine, just like it did when I included the -p option. (-R means recursive,
-v means verbose). So, removing -p option doesn't cause the foo server not
to start like all the other copying methods do.
I thought it might be a
Please keep it on the list.
Try enabling TRACE logging in conf/log4j.xml
to see whether it provides any more information in log/server.log:
!-- TRACE logging for the web container --
category name=org.jboss.web
priority value=TRACE class=org.jboss.logging.XLevel/
/category
!--
Scott M Stark wrote:
I did not get the file so try zipping it up and resending it.
Ok Scott, just let me know if you got it...
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Why undeployment could not delete temp directories...
Few days ago, Scott, I sent to you ucl.log (19 M !) along with server.log
Yes, it happens everytime on startup.
I have also tried it on other Windows 2000 boxes in the office, and it works
just fine as well. However, I have had three other Windows 2000 machines
that the error occurs on. I'm not at all sure what the delta is. The
Windows 2000 machines are identical
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 18:45, Adrian Brock wrote:
The problem is with the jboss.net deployer.
It opens the archive using a classloader.getResource()
(which under windows will lock the file)
to see whether it contains a certain descriptor.
You are seeing a difference because in the jboss
On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 14:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody answer, so I can assume that it is all correct ? :-)
I do not want to trigger a lengthy debate that might have already been
discussed previously. I am just looking for some pointers if something
is not right in the way I think the
I have a page (struts-action) let's call it home-page. This home-page needs to be
accessible to both authenticated and unauthenticated users (it builds a menu based on
your role).
I've tried leaving the page unprotected but getRemoteUser() returns null...
I've tried protecting the page, but
Peter Ondruska wrote:
I would say that instead of sending the update individually they are
trying to fix the problem and update will be sent afterwards.
Oh yes. They try to fix this problem since they bought Flashline.
One of the most terrible services I ever seen. Even NY Waterway sometimes
Hi Adrian,
Happy new year 2004.
You mention about Interceptor stuff, where can I find information and
example on Interceptor stuff? I believe this stuff is Jboss specific,
right.
My objective to use Mbean is to act as a caching layer (where the cached
object is stored), I only require a
Title: RE: [JBoss-user] Local/Global transaction with MDB
Adrian,
Thanks for the answer.
One little doubt that I'd like to clarify. In the Bean managed transaction case, you are saying Bean managed is similar to NotSupported. Any transaction used to deliver the message is suspended
30 matches
Mail list logo
