This is fixed in Branch_3_2 and HEAD.
The bug was that, the fields with read-time-out=-1 would never be loaded.
Thanks for the details.
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
At 17:31 01.12.2003, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Unfortunately, I still can't reproduce it. Could you please provide me
with the DDs
EJB deployment descriptors can be translated to JBoss-specific ones with
FoeDeployer in CVS in Branch_3_2 and HEAD in module varia. It is based
on XSLT.
Sasidharan, Manoj wrote:
Hello All,
Is there any guide or article that discusses the tasks and pitfalls when
migrating a J2EE application
What methods are in the home, local home, local and remote interfaces?
Sasidharan, Manoj wrote:
Hello All,
Server: JBoss 3.2.3.RC1
JDK:1.4.0_01
OS: Windows NT 4 SP6
Here is the stack trace of the exception from the JBoss server console. The
deployment goes fine. Server does not complain
Maybe it's because in web.xml you use ejb-local-ref and in jboss-web.xml
ejb-ref (not ejb-local-ref)?
Pedro Salazar wrote:
Greetings,
I deployed my EJB the name ServiceInfo and the JNDI names
ejb/ServiceInfo and ejb/ServiceInfoLocal, for the remote and local
interfaces respectively.
In my
Is the table updated from another application? There are no UPDATEs in
the log.
I wanted you to try with read-only = false for the methods that have
read-only = true.
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
At 15:39 25.11.2003, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Could you try with read-onlyfalse/read-only?
We don't
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
At 11:54 26.11.2003, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Is the table updated from another application? There are no UPDATEs in
the log.
The table was updated from JBoss thru direct SQL.
I wanted you to try with read-only = false for the methods that have
read-only = true
I would think this is absolutely fine if the bean is read-only=false and
just the method is read-only=true.
If caching is the requirement then commit option A should be used. What
do you think, Adrian?
Adrian Brock wrote:
The obvious fix would be to add what is done for no transaction in the
Why do you think so?
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
hi,
it's possible to switch off caching in Entity Beans? We user Commit
Option C, but JBoss is caching the entities.
Regards,
Rafal
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback
Are 1. and 3. peformed in the same transaction? If so, this is the
expected behaviour.
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
At 12:24 25.11.2003, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Why do you think so?
Cause we can see it. We have a folder table. We don't want that JBoss is
caching entities from this table, cause
Can you see that container loads data from the database while performing
3.? Other than primary key.
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
At 13:50 25.11.2003, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Are 1. and 3. peformed in the same transaction? If so, this is the
expected behaviour.
no. 1. is one transaction, 2
With commit option C instances are not cached between transactions.
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
At 14:28 25.11.2003, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Can you see that container loads data from the database while
performing 3.? Other than primary key.
We have to check this.
It's possible to switch off
Could you try with read-onlyfalse/read-only?
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
hi,
At 14:28 25.11.2003, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Can you see that container loads data from the database while
performing 3.? Other than primary key.
We've checked this.
We call in the first transaction out business
Yes.
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
At 15:39 25.11.2003, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Could you try with read-onlyfalse/read-only?
By default is this false.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you
The read-only is applied to the specific bean/method as defined in the
DDs. No inheritance rules.
Pete Beck wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 11:26, Kevin Conner wrote:
We stuck with the pessimistic locking and enabled read-only methods.
The CMP engine grabs the lock for the duration of the
Stefan Arentz wrote:
I noticed that there is no GROUP BY in JBoss-QL. Is that for a reason?
It would be good to have it.
Looking at the source of the EJB-QL compiler, is this something that can
be added by using the ORDER BY code? The two are probably roughly the same?
Be sure.
Alwyn Schoeman wrote:
Hi,
At what level can you specify different cmp commit options?
Container level. This is specified in jboss.xml like this:
entity
ejb-nameChild/ejb-name
local-jndi-nameChildLocal/local-jndi-name
configuration-namecustom
Pete Beck wrote:
Hi all,
I have just been reading through the docs about using optimistic
locking.
According to the docs, to use optimistic locking, you must also use the
instance per transaction policy.
However, the docs also state that you cannot use commit option A with
instance per
Pedro Salazar wrote:
On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 21:13, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
You are doing it wrong. In ejbPassivate the flag should be set to false.
Please, read about activation/passivation in the spec.
There is also a nice picture on this subject.
Alexey,
I've read the EJB spec but I only
Alwyn Schoeman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 05:33:48PM +0200, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
From what I can learn on the web it seems that a read-mostly pattern is
where
you have 2 copies of a bean, one read-only and the other read-write. It
seems
that you need to write at a specific interval
Is bean read-only in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml? It should be.
The second thing to keep in mind is that the cache also has some
limitations and, probably, can't keep the whole database in memory.
Pedro Salazar wrote:
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 20:02, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Can't you calculate the value
Pedro Salazar wrote:
Yes, the bean is read-only, however I set a read timeout of 300ms. It's
too low but I don't know if this works in read-only beans, does it?
Yes, sure. The default value is -1, which means never timeout.
And
if true, when the time starts for the timeout?
When the container
You are doing it wrong. In ejbPassivate the flag should be set to false.
Please, read about activation/passivation in the spec.
There is also a nice picture on this subject.
Pedro Salazar wrote:
One more thing, when the bean is passivated only the non-transient
variables are saved (probably to
Alwyn Schoeman wrote:
I'm not that familiar with CMP and JBoss yet.
Would that mean commit option B for the row-locking?
Yes.
From what I can learn on the web it seems that a read-mostly pattern is where
you have 2 copies of a bean, one read-only and the other read-write. It seems
that you need
Unfortunately, it is a spec violation.
10.5.2 Bean Providers entity bean instances view
public void ejbActivate();
The container invokes this method on the instance when the container
picks the instance from
the pool and assigns it to a specific entity object identity. The
ejbActivate() method
Can't you calculate the value once and add a flag 'calculated' that will
indicate it?
Pedro Salazar wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to get access to some information available on my entity
bean during the activate() method to prepare it and avoid doing it every
call to in a interface method.
Yes, it also would help. Thanks.
Raghuram wrote:
Hi,
I might be wrong here, but would it not help him if he used optimistic
concurrency for writes to ensure consistency of the data ?
raghu
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alexey
Loubyansky
Milen Dyankov wrote:
That is not a bad idea, but I wonder if it's going to work when my
object is local interface of CMP Bean.
Thanks Dan, I'll give it a try.
Are you going to store a local interface as a BLOB? I guess, this is not
supposed to work. You can obtain a Handle for EJBObject that can
It's legal.
Milen Dyankov wrote:
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Milen Dyankov wrote:
That is not a bad idea, but I wonder if it's going to work when my
object is local interface of CMP Bean.
Thanks Dan, I'll give it a try.
Are you going to store a local interface as a BLOB? I guess
in
another tx.
Phil Shrimpton wrote:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 15:57, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Hi,
Then the problem might occur when clients access *different* orders
which share items. The call order.getItems() can be performed at the
same time for both clients (w/o locking) as orders
Are you trying to set autocommit? You can not do it in a managed tx.
Sasidharan, Manoj wrote:
Hello Adrian,
Thanks for taking some time for helping me on this issue. Here is the stack
trace at the server when the problem occurs.
20:26:31,122 WARN [TxConnectionManager$LocalXAResource] Prepare
What is the actual problem? Why do you think that if only one connection
is used it is not optimized?
Markus Härnvi wrote:
Hi!
I have a MDB reading a constant stream of messages from a Queue. The MDB is
storing the messages through two CMP entity bean with a CMR.
The data written to the
The first stack trace id informative. There is some unclosed connection
that is supposed to be open by your application. This connection is
closed by JBoss and the stacktrace is for your info. Do you deal with
connections directly?
The second exception looks like a bug. But I would let Adrian
I think, redeploying everything that references the redeployed beans is
only way.
Rod Macpherson wrote:
We use loose EJB jars during development rather than an EAR file so we
can hot-deploy specific pieces. Unfortunately a session bean hot-deploy
causes a class-cast exception the next time
If defaults do not work for you, you should try different types
yourself. Please, let us know your findings. Thanks.
Milen Dyankov wrote:
Hi all,
we have problem using JBoss (3.2.1) with Firebird DB (1.5.0rc7 /
JayBird JDCB 1.0.1).
Everything works just fine with MySQL at backend, but with
Phil Shrimpton wrote:
On Friday 14 November 2003 09:15, Adrian Brock wrote:
Hi,
JBoss 3.2.2, Commit Option A...
I have a SLSB method something like...
public void doSomething(){
Collection c = OrdersEJB.getItems();
loop through collection and do some calculations
delete one of the
In this case, to ensure the consistency of the data you have to lock the
data in the database. It means using row-locking, i.e SELECT ... FOR
UPDATE. To solve the scalability problem, you could consider a
read-mostly pattern with 'Standard CMP 2.x EntityBean with cache
invalidation' container.
Phil Shrimpton wrote:
Are the clients accessing different orders which have common items? And
then one of the common items is removed?
Yes, they could also be accessing the same 'order' and (with the same the
same items)
Then the problem might occur when clients access *different* orders
This is from JDBCKeyGeneratorCreateCommand:
try {
KeyGeneratorFactory keyGeneratorFactory =
(KeyGeneratorFactory) new InitialContext().lookup(factoryName);
keyGenerator = keyGeneratorFactory.getKeyGenerator();
} catch (NamingException e) {
throw new
It is fixed in the CVS. Thanks.
Boulatian, Misak wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Hi Adrian,
Here is the trace you asked for.
Search for string 'MISAK: default account=0001' that comes right after
create(). This one sets default account on remote interface. The string
'MISAK: active account=0001' is
row-locking would help. But it might not be the best option in your case.
Phil Shrimpton wrote:
On Tuesday 18 November 2003 14:58, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Hi,
Are the clients accessing different orders which have common items? And
then one of the common items is removed?
Yes, they could
Thanks for sharing the experience.
In general, JBossCMP calls setObject() when it gave up to recognize the
type (java.sql.Types).
Milen Dyankov wrote:
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
If defaults do not work for you, you should try different types
yourself. Please, let us know your findings. Thanks
have two datasources - XA and Non-XA and Session bean uses both to
complete its operation. Only the XA needs to be rolled-back.
rgds
MS
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Loubyansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 4:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss
It is cut off by the database, not JBossCMP. You should increase the
size for the column.
Brian McSweeney wrote:
Hi all,
My ejbs are cmp ones and the string parameters I use are as follows
/**
* @ejb.persistence
* column-name=stringDescription
*
:- ) wrote:
Hi Alex,
thanks for the reply.
Could you tell me the best way to increase the size of a column in
JBoss.
I'm using the default cmp mappings to deploy and create my
database, so if I want to increase the size of the file then I think I
have the following options:
1) alter the
It depends on the database you are using. For example, you could use
LONGVARCHAR, or TEXT, or, finally, CLOB. Check the docs for your
database supported types.
:- ) wrote:
Thanks so much Alex,
I actually am using standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml, got a bit confused, sorry!
Anyway, bad news is when
You have to check that:
- the CMR field is accessed in an active transaction
- the CMR collection is used in the transaction in which it was created.
Balakrishnan, Vijay wrote:
Hi,
Could somebody please tell me what i need to do regarding this error.
Thanks,
Vijay
The primary key value is cached in the proxy. When getPrimaryKey() is
called the cached value is returned. Thus, avoiding the creation of the
invocation object and passing to the container and all the interceptors.
This means, no locking, no synchronization and other expensive operations.
Percy Christian wrote:
Thanks for your kind support.
Here is the insert SQL
INSERT INTO CONTACT (CONTACT_ID, NAME, ADDRESS, TEL1, TEL2, TEL3, GSM,
FAX, EMAIL, URL, IBAN_CODE, BIC, COMMENTS, CREATION_DATE, LOCALITY_ID,
Manufacturer_contact) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?,
?,
It is called but the synchronization does not occur, right?
Till the 3.2.2 it was not easy to avoid this. I'll look at it.
Pedro Salazar wrote:
Greetings,
Why is that my entity beans are always calling the ejbStore() (I put
there a print message to watch) when I'm not updating none of them? I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have been following the thread started by Pedro Salazar.
jboss.xml:
jboss
enterprise-beans
entity
ejb-nameCorrectionFile/ejb-name
local-jndi-nameCorrectionFile/local-jndi-name
read-onlyTrue/read-only
It should be the same in 3.2.2
Pedro Salazar wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 12:23, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
It is called but the synchronization does not occur, right?
Till the 3.2.2 it was not easy to avoid this. I'll look at it.
Alexey,
I tried on 3.2.1 but since you have referred that issue
The store() is called each time when the synchronization should occur
according to the spec.
Pedro Salazar wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 14:07, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
It should be the same in 3.2.2
I may have understood it wrong but do you mean that entity beans CMP
always call the store
You are correct. Just read the comments from the spec Olve posted.
Brian McSweeney wrote:
I must say, I understood it to be the total opposite. I thought commit
option A requires the least number of db lookups because it's all in the
jboss cache. Please correct me if I am wrong.
This means that
Marek Lange wrote:
I have defined some default values in my database. They should be used
when a table record is inserted and the corresponding field is missing
in the ejb call.
This was my understanding of doing this with ejbCreate():
If I want the default value to be used, the record is
Pedro Salazar wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 16:30, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
The store() is called each time when the synchronization should occur
according to the spec.
The question is when and why the synchronization occurs? Why is that the
JBOSS is requiring synchronization? Has
No, it doesn't. In fact, read-only fields are not included in neither
INSERT nor UPDATE. But that does not help you, probably.
Marek Lange wrote:
Alexey Loubyansky schrieb:
You have no other choice than initializing the fields in the
ejbCreate. Not all databases allows you to skip values
)
at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.LogInterceptor.invokeHome(LogInterceptor.java:120)
... 21 more
Can anyone explain why on earth I'm getting this error and how I can fix
it???
*/Alexey Loubyansky [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:
Be honest ;) Did you modify the generated by Middlegen sources?
Steven Nakhla wrote
the spec has us all hogtied. I'll have to look into
what value objects can provide me with regard to CMR collections,
then.
-Neal
On November 10, 2003 03:03 pm, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
First, it is the spec requirement.
Second, do you run Servlet container in the same VM as JBoss? If
so, you could
It is about declared-sql queries. This covered in for-pay docs.
In jbosscmp-jdbc.xml in query element you can specify declared-sql like:
query
query-method
method-nameejbSelectmethod-name/method-name
method-params
I know ;)
julien viet wrote:
yes it works well.
What about using filters to begin/commit transactions?
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache,
? I've been getting this
same exception for weeks now!
*/Alexey Loubyansky [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:
It worked for me when I used AddressLocal to establish relationships on
the server side.
Steven Nakhla wrote:
Yep. Not that the non-modified sources worked any better. I've
You should read the spec. At least relevant parts. You'll find many
interesting stuff and save everyone's time.
Steven Nakhla wrote:
You know, in all the tutorials or books I've read, I've never seen that
little tidbit of information. None of them said that only local
interfaces can be used.
What is the SQL query generated?
Your configuration does not match the DTD. Which is
!ELEMENT ejb-relationship-role (ejb-relationship-role-name,
fk-constraint?, key-fields?, read-ahead?)
Is it deployed w/o errors?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear sir
I am using
Be honest ;) Did you modify the generated by Middlegen sources?
Steven Nakhla wrote:
First, thanks to all who responded regarding my CMR problems with
XDoclet/JBoss. As advised, I have used Middlegen to automatically
create my entity beans from my database table. These beans represent a
I would remove about 80% of XDoclet tags first.
1. you don't have to copy them for setters if you have them for getters.
2. remove @jboss.target-relation
Pedro Salazar wrote:
Greetings,
I'm unable to define a relationship between 2 entity beans, service and
primitive. If I comment in the
First, it is the spec requirement.
Second, do you run Servlet container in the same VM as JBoss? If so, you
could begin/commit transaction in the web layer and no need for value
objects.
Neal Sanche wrote:
Hi All,
I've found recently that it's becoming increasingly painful to avoid
the 'CMR
It is about GROUP BY. You can't do it with either EJB- nor JBoss-QL at
the moment.
Darren Hartford wrote:
Hey all,
I got an interesting problem that I should think some of you may have already come
across in some fashion or another. I want to do a search to return a collection of
objects,
Phil Shrimpton wrote:
On Thursday 06 November 2003 22:51, Bill Burke wrote:
Hi,
As this app 'owns' its own database and the DB is not that quick, I
though that changing from the default commit option B to A should give me
some improvements, but seems to make no difference.
Are you doing a lot
);
} catch (Exception e) {
System.out.println(...);
}
what is wrong in here?
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Loubyansky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Martes, 04 de Noviembre de 2003 03:31 tarde
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev
Unless it is many-to-many relationship you should use either
@jboss.relation or @jboss.target-relation tags.
Pedro Salazar wrote:
Greetings,
-I have 2 entities mapped from 2 database tables, ACCESS_PERMISSION and
ACCESS_SCHEDULE.
-the relation between them is, ACCESS_PERMISSION *has* several
Stefan Arentz wrote:
SELECT DISTINCT OBJECT(s)
FROM Subscriptions AS s
WHERE s.user = ?1 and s.lastSession is not null
ORDER BY s.lastSession.createDate
DESC LIMIT ?2
It returns the cartasian product of Subscription/User objects.
Could you please post the SQL generated for this query?
Doesn't
create-tabletrue/create-table
remove-tabletrue/remove-table
help you?
Joachim (PROGS) wrote:
In my applications, I know in advance that my data structure will change
over time. To handle this, I would prefer that the database structure is
checked and possibly updated
Do you define relationships in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml?
The table might not have a primary key but entity must have according to
the spec. Do you have primkey-field defined in ejb-jar.xml?
Pedro Salazar wrote:
Greetings,
I have a table Access_Permission that _has_ relation 1-* to
Access_Schedule.
Pedro Salazar wrote:
When happens that the entity in the database has no primary key, we must
generate a key for the entity bean which may not exist in database,
right? But if that key has no persistence, how the container will handle
it? And the cluster works fine with that (probably)?
Are you
The same way as in 3.2.2: by increasing log level to DEBUG for category
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.
How could I reproduce it? Do you have a testcase?
Thanks.
Markus Härnvi wrote:
Please, try with fresh Branch_3_2 in 24 hours. I fixed a bug that could
be the cause of your problem. Thanks.
I
Could you please send/submit the patch to XDoclet project? Thank you!
Ivens Porto wrote:
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
You are trying to use uknown and 'known' primary keys at the same time.
You must use either one. Just remove unknown-pk.
Yes, you need to use jdbc-type/sql-type in key-field
Finder queries must return remote or local interfaces. You should use
SELECT OBJECT(o)
ejbSelect methods are allowed to return CMP field values. Please, check
the spec for more info.
Ulf Tidstrand wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have declared a simple EJB QL statement in xdoclet:
*
Please, try with fresh Branch_3_2 in 24 hours. I fixed a bug that could
be the cause of your problem. Thanks.
Markus Härnvi wrote:
Thanks Scott for the answer about SSL/Tomcat!
Next one: :)
I'm using cascade-delete between a few CMP beans. My test cases that works in
3.2.2RC4 now fails in
What is the JBoss version?
Did this code ran fine in previous versions?
Any more info?
Thanks.
Edgar Silva wrote:
Hi Folks...
I have a very strange trouble:
I have one CMP EntityBean, and I execute the findByPrimaryKey,
and then I call the remove() method And nothing occurs...
The Record
Yes, it should. It is not yet clear for me how the fk field accord to be
non-null. All fk fields allow null values by default. Perhaps, it came
from sql-type? Could you, please, post the declaration of the unknown pk
from your DDs?
Ivens Porto wrote:
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
It works for me
accord should be read occured ;)
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Yes, it should. It is not yet clear for me how the fk field accord to be
non-null. All fk fields allow null values by default. Perhaps, it came
from sql-type? Could you, please, post the declaration of the unknown pk
from your DDs
Silva
www.argostecnologia.com
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
What is the JBoss version?
Did this code ran fine in previous versions?
Any more info?
Thanks.
Edgar Silva wrote:
Hi Folks...
I have a very strange trouble:
I have one CMP EntityBean, and I execute the findByPrimaryKey,
and then I call
Probably, I could. Post your DDs, first, please.
Ivens Porto wrote:
Ivens Porto wrote:
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
It works for me.
public abstract Integer getIntegerField();
public abstract void setIntegerField(Integer value);
public abstract int getIntField();
public abstract void
You are trying to use uknown and 'known' primary keys at the same time.
You must use either one. Just remove unknown-pk.
Yes, you need to use jdbc-type/sql-type in key-field.
Ivens Porto wrote:
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Yes, it should. It is not yet clear for me how the fk field accord
Yes, sorry. Of course, sync-on-commit-only must be false if you have
foreign key contraints.
Could you, please, submit a bug report with the detailed info? Thank you.
Markus Härnvi wrote:
Hi again!
It's set to false in both environments. I tried setting it to true in 3.2.2 but
that didn't help.
Branch_3_2
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
At 20:24 28.10.2003 +0200, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
It is fixed now.
In main cvs branch?
Regards,
Rafal
alex
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
hi,
I'm using MySQL 4.0.13 and 4.0.14 (4.0.16 I will test tomorrow) and
JBoss 3.2.2. And I have problems with this query
Could you post a stacktrace, please? And some description of what was
going to be cascade-deleted?
Thanks.
Markus Härnvi wrote:
Thanks Scott for the answer about SSL/Tomcat!
Next one: :)
I'm using cascade-delete between a few CMP beans. My test cases that works in
3.2.2RC4 now fails in 3.2.2
Is sync-on-commit-only set to true in RC4? I guess, it is false in final
and, hence, is the expected behaviour.
Markus Härnvi wrote:
Hi!
Could you post a stacktrace, please? And some description of what was
going to be cascade-deleted?
Sure.
SearchCriteria has zero or more children
Phil Shrimpton wrote:
On Friday 24 October 2003 10:50, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
as for me, 3.0.8 is wrong and 3.2.2 is correct.
Interesting, especially as another app server (Borland's) generates the same
SQL as 3.0.8
Since you use OR between the terms
o.contact.surnameUpper = ?2
Phil Shrimpton wrote:
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 10:13, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Let's describe the condition
o.contact.surnameUpper = ?2 OR o.vehicle.registrationNumber = ?3
in English.
My interpretation is select all o that have contact with surname ?2 OR
have vehicle with registration
It is fixed now.
alex
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
hi,
I'm using MySQL 4.0.13 and 4.0.14 (4.0.16 I will test tomorrow) and
JBoss 3.2.2. And I have problems with this query (generated by JBoss):
insert into user(class_id, retail_id, mandant_id, language_id,
user_data_id, nickname, login_name,
Phil Shrimpton wrote:
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 15:16, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Alex
o.contact.surnameUpper = ?2 OR o.vehicle.registrationNumber = ?3
in English.
My interpretation is select all o that have contact with surname ?2 OR
have vehicle with registration number ?3
Note, o is allowed
http://jboss.org/services/bea-port.jsp
WebLogic 6.1
Your feedback would be highly appreciated.
alex
David Ward wrote:
Hi, all -
Didn't there used to be a project that given weblogic-specific deployment
descriptors, jboss could automagically translate it to it's own needs and use it
It works for me.
public abstract Integer getIntegerField();
public abstract void setIntegerField(Integer value);
public abstract int getIntField();
public abstract void setIntField(int value);
12:30:34,262 DEBUG [Child] Executing SQL: CREATE TABLE CHILD(CHILD_ID
BIGINT NOT NULL, name
Joachim (PROGS) wrote:
Is this a new limitation or was this introduced in 3.2.2? We have 64
column entity beans and AFAIK we have been inserting on them. Thx
This limitation didn't exist in 3.2.1, it appeared in 3.2.2.
In which RC was it introduced?
RC4. It is fixed in current Branch_3_2.
alex
Yes, you can do it. But it would be interesting to know whether JBossCMP
initialized the fields to 0 instead of NULL.
alex
Jason Essington wrote:
On Thursday, October 23, 2003, at 05:08 AM, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
Are there CMP fields mapped to the foreign key column
Finders have to return Collection by the specification.
alex
Ivens Porto wrote:
Hi,
I'm using JBoss 3.2.2.
I have an entity bean (CMP) with a home method that returns all
instances of the bean, the method is called findAll.
When using a return type of java.util.Collection in the findAll
If you run out of available columns again and it will be the problem of
JBossCMP (not database) then, please, submit a bug report.
alex
Jason Essington wrote:
According to the commit notes, Alexey has raised the limit on columns to
infinity in the latest cvs of the 3.2 branch.
Although, I
I'll look at it and let you know.
alex
Jason Essington wrote:
I have some tables in a database that are used by some of my CMP/CMR
entity beans. The foreign key columns in some of these tables don't have
foreign key integrity checks enforced in the database, and rather than
having null in
At the moment, the SQL you see is executed and LIMIT/OFFSET is applied
to the result of the query (ResultSet). LIMIT/OFFSET is not sent to the
database.
alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
We're using DynamicQL in our JBoss-application for a complex query. That
works fine.
Now we want to
101 - 200 of 403 matches
Mail list logo
