Yet again I can't wait to read the statement that I
hope Marc or someone is preparing right away. I spoke
to two more people tonight, one from Sun that has
learned of the conflict going on. I can only imagine
how quickly this is going to proliferate through
various companies that once again JBoss
HI!,
I would much like for Bill to do the waltz around these issues and for
U to just keep the technology as U are excellent at ... sorry to but in
... but i do think Bill when being consequent... is holding up quit
well
later
v
On Thursday, Aug 7, 2003, at 21:37 Europe/Stockholm,
These are the reasons for the removals:
Two companies, both selling training, support and documentation for a
product that is controlled by one of the two companies. Anyone else see
a problem here?
Naturally, the company controlling the project will try to put their
competitor at a
I'll send money too
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Duffey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Re: Recent CVS removals
If I send you the money for one of those big
Australian beers we see on the commercials here
Scott M Stark wrote:
... especially given the fact that there was no discussion on any
public or private JBoss channel...
We have been told many times in public and private not to post dissenting
views to the jboss lists - so we could hardly discuss our reasons for
a fork there. Plus many of
Bill Burke wrote:
The fact remains that you participated in a JBoss fork. This shows a
complete lack of commitment to the JBoss project and community. You have
lost the trust of the JBoss project admins.
Frankly Bill, I don't see what good removing their CVS commit priviledge
is going to do:
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 04:16, Kevin Duffey wrote:
If I send you the money for one of those big
Australian beers we see on the commercials here, will
you reply with a nice long email? ;)
You can *have* our Fosters. *bleh*
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Firstly a note to the list moderator: This is a request for CVS access, so
I believe that it is on topic and should not be censored.
Bill Burke wrote:
JBoss Group, as caretaker of the JBoss project, has recently decided to
remove CVS access committers for a few of our committers. We do not remove
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Greg Wilkins
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-user] Re: Recent CVS removals
Firstly a note to the list moderator
Most new companies are conceived and put together in private.
There is nothing about contributing to an open source project that
should prevent you from having private/secret commercial
plans. Do you
post all your commercial plans to use JBoss on the list?
In most cases I would agree with
Maybe this is a good reason for not having any commercial entity have 100%
control of the
commit rights of an open source project. I don't know what is the best
solution to prevent forking and duplication of efforts, especially when
commercial interests are involved with open source projects.
I understand that there are two sides to every story...
There are actually three sides to every story...
His side, Her side, and the truth, which requires nothing short
of the wisdom of Solomon to grasp.
---
This SF.Net email
] Re: Recent CVS removals
Yet again I can't wait to read the statement that I
hope Marc or someone is preparing right away. I spoke
to two more people tonight, one from Sun that has
learned of the conflict going on. I can only imagine
how quickly this is going to proliferate through
various
Its simply. We are not about to work with developers who we now feel have to be
watched for every checkin because we don't know what their motives are. There
was a decision to leave, fine, no action taken. There was a decision to fork,
fine, you are removed as a developer. Any expection to
Barlow, Dustin wrote:
Maybe its time for the CDN folks to be a little more forthcoming about their
real intentions and explain why they felt they needed to plan and implement
their flight/fork from the JBoss Group in secret.
Most new companies are conceived and put together in private.
There is
Bill Burke wrote:
Jetty will still be shipped with major releases and Jetty integration will
still be maintained. The Jetty folks can still submit patches via
SourceForge, but they have lost the privilege of committing. CVS access is
a privilege, not a right, and is a contract of trust between
If I send you the money for one of those big
Australian beers we see on the commercials here, will
you reply with a nice long email? ;)
--- Greg Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Barlow, Dustin wrote:
Maybe its time for the CDN folks to be a little
more forthcoming about their
real
17 matches
Mail list logo
