Re: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X

2004-01-07 Thread Mark Lassau
Thanks for clearing that up, there had been a number of emails and posts in the Web forums about this and us Jetty users were getting a little anxious. We do appreciate the high level of traffic on this list and the forums, coupled with the silly season of Xmas/ New Year (hence my late reply).

RE: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X

2004-01-05 Thread Sacha Labourey
18, 2003 8:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X I would also like to see regular Jetty releases, despite the fact that it is no longer the container of choice. However I am not holding my breath, as previous post seem to indicate that politics come

Re: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X

2004-01-05 Thread Scott M Stark
There has not been an annoucement that we will not provide a jetty bundle. There has not been a seperate bundle due to the fact that the initial testing indicated new unit test failures that I did not have time to look into. We are simply taking the latest stable sar release from the jetty

Re: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X

2003-12-22 Thread Thomas Hentschel Lund
no further issues to speak of. -Original Message- From: Mike Moulton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 8:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X I would also like to see regular Jetty releases, despite the fact

Re: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X

2003-12-21 Thread Mark Lassau
: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X I would also like to see regular Jetty releases, despite the fact that it is no longer the container of choice. However I am not holding my breath, as previous post seem to indicate that politics come before innovation. .. Mike

RE: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X

2003-12-18 Thread Peter Ondruska
not familiar with sf.net but if it is not too complicated I offer my help producing latest JBoss+Jetty if there are not enough resources. Original Message Follows From: Rupp, Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X

Re: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X

2003-12-18 Thread Mike Moulton
: RE: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:22:48 +0100 I would expect, that you can just take a jetty sar from a previous release, remove the tomcat sar from deploy/ and put the jetty one in. Heiko -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X

2003-12-18 Thread Rod Macpherson
, December 18, 2003 8:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X I would also like to see regular Jetty releases, despite the fact that it is no longer the container of choice. However I am not holding my breath, as previous post seem to indicate that politics come

Re: [JBoss-user] jboss 3.2.3 + jetty X

2003-12-17 Thread Mark Lassau
Your question has been asked here (on 4/12/2003) and on JBoss Forums: http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=43294 But has not been answered. I know JBoss have decided to move the default bundle back to including Tomcat, but do they intend to also release a Jetty bundle with each