On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
This XDoclet results in 1:m with relation table mapping (on my machine).
you are of course right - i have even written it in the (elided) javadoc
of this method ;-)
And it is in fact broken at the moment.
True m:n works fine for me.
Fixed in
This XDoclet results in 1:m with relation table mapping (on my machine).
And it is in fact broken at the moment.
True m:n works fine for me.
Here is an example of unidirectional m:n
/**
* @ejb.interface-method
* @ejb.relation
*name=B-C
*role-name=B-has-Cs
*
This XDoclet results in 1:m with relation table mapping (on
my machine).
And it is in fact broken at the moment.
Fixed in 3.2.4RC2 and 4.0.0DR4.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by
