Further to this thread:
I did some digging around in the XDoclet source code and found out that
the templates that XDoclet 1.2b2 uses for generating the JBoss XML
descriptors support JBoss versions 2.4, 3.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.0.3 and
3.1.
Fortunately, XDoclet 1.2b3 (released last week) seems to
Hi,
I'm using Jboss3.0 with Postgresql7.3. I have no problem with creating
table when I deployed my EJB.
I just want to know if I can use the autoincrement function of Postgresql
(NEXTVAL) from my EJB.
Thanks in advanced.
--
Hello Maxime,
not in 3.0 branch. It is possible only in 3.2.
alex
Tuesday, June 17, 2003, 12:52:46 PM, Maxime CHAMBREUIL wrote:
MC Hi,
MC I'm using Jboss3.0 with Postgresql7.3. I have no problem with creating
MC table when I deployed my EJB.
MC I just want to know if I can use the
Title: Message
Hi,
I am
having some problems with the generated sql from JBoss 3.2.1 on a PostgresSql
7.2, not using indexes.
If I try
to use find by primary key on a CMP bean called Slot (using id 1400), where the
primary key is a Long, the generated look like that:
SELECT
slot_id FROM
Title: Message
Hi,
I
would guess you should be using a remote reference, not a local
reference.
Rgds,
Dan.
--
Danny Yates
-Original Message-From: Burns, Jamie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 June 2003
17:33To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
[JBoss-user] EJB
Title: Message
hi
i want
to find out how i can view the sqls generated by the
container.
thanks
raghu
Add the following to log4j.xml
category name=org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp
priority value=DEBUG/
/category
alex
Tuesday, June 17, 2003, 1:07:32 PM, raghuram raghuram wrote:
r Messagehi
r i want to find out how i can view the sqls generated by the container.
r thanks
r raghu
Title: Message
set
your log level to DEBUG in log4j.properties file.
vikas.
There are only 10 kinds of people
in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
-Original Message-From: raghuram
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 3:38
thanks
raghu
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alexey
Loubyansky
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 4:07 PM
To: raghuram
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] viewing generated sql
Add the following to log4j.xml
category name=org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp
Title: Message
Hi,
I'm
not up on the spec per se, but my understanding is that local references should
only be used in the same JAR file (or EAR file) - essentially, within the same
classloader.
I
believe that in cases such as this JBoss essentially uses local references any
way, so the
Hej alle
Du kan (skal) nu benytte din e-mail-adresse så den ender med .net i stedet
for .nu, så hvis du får hed [EMAIL PROTECTED] hedder du nu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail til
den gamle adresse vil automatisk blive viderestillet til den nye adresse.
Hvad skal du gøre? Hvis du bruger webmail, skal du
Hi all,
I went to the Sun JavaOne conference in the Netherlands yesterday.
I talked to a lot of people, and noticed that not many people are using
JBoss in a production environment.
I was wondering? How many of you are actually running production systems
on JBoss?
Grtz,
Harm de Laat
Submit a bug report to sourceforge with the test war as an attachment.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: John Dubchak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003
Jeremy,
Thanks for the reply. It gave us some ideas that we hadn't tried before
(mainly CMP2.x). However, the deadlock issue remains.
One point that I want to make that I didn't make earlier is that execution
never returns to the blocking spid (spid 53 in my previous post), which
would allow it
I Use JBoss 2.4.7 in 3 machines, and 10 sites
Never had problems, but are small traffic ones ;)
Giorgio
Hi all,
I was wondering? How many of you are actually running production systems
on JBoss?
Grtz,
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored
Hi all,
Does commit option A currently have
any meaning in the context of a clustered JBoss instance (since there's
no distributed locking and presumably the preload cache is not distributed)?
Dave
This question pops up here regularly - did you search the archives?
JBoss is used widely in production - we use it in all our apps for a
telecom company (not running the actual network, but all the systems
that run the company.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I went to the Sun JavaOne
We have 3 large volume web based reporting systems in production using both
the 3.0 and 3.2 series of JBoss. So far, no major problems.
Dustin Barlow
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
We have an application running focussing at sales departments.
It supports them in there aquisition as well as their relation management.
We have, on average 50 users concurrently using the system.
We are still using JBoss 2.4.6 though.
Regards,
Sales Companion :)
Cor Hofman
The
hi,
we are developing an multimedia content management system application for
internal use. client in Java Swing communicates thru XML protocol with
JBoss 3.2.2RC1 and Jetty. this system will be used by about 10 peple for
storing and menaging (e.g. editing meta informations) media files
You
can use it with cache-invalidation. Consult the docs.
Cache-invalidation isn't transactional though so shouldn't be used with critical
data. Bela and Harald are implementing a distributed cache for
JB4.
Go on
a bean by bean strategy. If the bean is read-only, than commit-A in
cluster
I've been using JBoss 3.0.6+Tomcat 4.1.18 for development, and just upgraded to JBoss 3.2.2RC1 + Tomcat 4.1.24.
Code which previously worked, now suddenly isn't... Specifically, my servlet is trying to look up java:comp/UserTransaction, and failing.
I do not have any references to
I don't see the actual exception, which means this is a guess.
The driver-class element needs to contain the fully qualified class name of
a class implementing Driver. I doubt Jdbc3PoolingDataSource does.
david jencks
On 2003.06.07 08:13 Andreas Amstutz wrote:
Hi,
While setting up 2 data
The jca 1.5 solution is (just now) implemented in jboss 4, and the jmsra
wrapper is using it to deliver messages. I'd be really grateful for code
review and suggestions.
One step I have planned is to move the ProviderAdapter into the jca
adapter, but I haven't looked into exactly what this
On 2003.06.09 12:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've just encountered the dreaded ClassCastException error
that's thrown due to the fact that the type of the
java class is now a function of the class loader as well as the name.
I read the Classloader excerpt from
I met a big problem when developing and debuging.
If I deploy the application as a war file, the jboss needs about 30
seconds to deploy it. Although it is not too long, for developing and
debuging it is not affordable! The time for waiting is longer than the
time for fixxing the bug!
If I deploy
How are you controlling transactions?
I suggest you use UserTransaction or, better still, CMT. I think there are
no guarantees about using an adapters cci LocalTransaction across ejb
method calls.
The spi LocalTransaction or an xa transaction is associated with the
ManagedConnection. If you
JBoss 3.2.1
Solaris 8
JDK 1.3.1
During our load testing of the port of our application to JBoss, we
discovered that EJB call return values were being crossed (i.e. one
call's return data was the same for two calls)
After 4 days of debugging I discovered that the return value from this
stateless
If I deploy the application as a directory (e.g. app.war), the .jsp can
be reloaded when I replace a .jsp file in the directory. But the .class
file can not be updated once it has run. It seems the jboss has a cache
for the loaded .class file.
I think:
If you try to re-deploy the application
You get several lightweight connection handles attached to the same
ManagedConnection object, which is what the transaction context is attached
to.
david jencks
On 2003.06.14 08:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, default oracle-ds.xml configures local transacation datasource. But
then I do not
Evidently, changing my lookup from java:comp/UserTransaction to just UserTransaction works...
The follow-on question is, is this standard? This seems like moving away from standard J2EE syntax, unless I'm missing something else... I thought I needed to look up these things in java:comp/ or
We are using JBoss 3.0.x during development and in production on a few
sites.
We have about 5-7 application servers running in a cluster for approx.
20 Swing based WebStart clients per site. The clients communicate with
the app-servers using HTTPS tunneled RMI and JBossMQ JMS over UIL2.
So far
Deployed with our app in three medium/large telcos. Currently we only have a
very small part of our application using jboss, the rest being legacy C++ but
that is changing. Version 3.0.4 and not clustered. Running on solaris
servers.
---
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 07:39, Peng Zhao wrote:
I met a big problem when developing and debuging.
If I deploy the application as a war file, the jboss needs about 30
seconds to deploy it. Although it is not too long, for developing and
debuging it is not affordable! The time for waiting is longer
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 07:42, David Jencks wrote:
The spi LocalTransaction or an xa transaction is associated with the
ManagedConnection. If you use the local tx ConnectionManager or the xa one
with track-connections-by-tx all connection handles you obtain within a
transaction will be associated
Check the References page in www.jboss.org:
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=htmlop=userdisplayid=services/references/index
Ricardo Argello
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:35 AM
Subject: [JBoss-user] Who is using
36 matches
Mail list logo
