comments: it doesn't break the
comment structure.
Regards,
Daniel
From: Paul Kinnucan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Le Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: auto-fill mode really works?
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 23:20:34 -0500
Le Wang writes:
Hi,
I know JDE is supposed
- Original Message -
From: Stephane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: sunsite.jde
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:09 AM
Subject: best features of jde
Hello all,
I plan to give a coure about jde and to introduce this IDE to my new
pupills
next january.
What would you show to
't break the
comment structure.
Regards,
Daniel
From: Paul Kinnucan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Le Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: auto-fill mode really works?
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 23:20:34 -0500
Le Wang writes:
Hi,
I know JDE is supposed to work nicely with a
Hi,
I'm having trouble compiling thru the compile server under cygwin. It works
fine under Solaris. Here is the error I'm getting: (from the interpreter
buffer)
-
cd /home/common/source/java/
c:/j2sdk1.4.0-beta3/bin/java -classpath
Hi,
I'm trying to adhere to a fill-column standard of 78 characters. But for some code I
have to
write, there are very long string constants, so I end up chaining together method
calls like the
following:
code
public class Test
{
public Test ()
{
}
public String CONSTANT=new
--- Ole Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But btw, why do you use Stringbuffer#append for String constants?
Just concat them with `+' and the compiler will make one long string
from the parts. This will happen at compile time.
With your method the compiler will emit seperate string constants
Hi,
In cygwin, if I have $CLASSPATH in a classpath type of variable, the string
is split on :, instead of `jde-classpath-separator'. This adds garbage
(e.g. C;C:/java/lib.jar;C;C:/java/lib2.jar) to the classpath used by the
compiler.
--
Le
--- Le Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,
In cygwin, if I have $CLASSPATH in a classpath type of variable, the
string
is split on :, instead of `jde-classpath-separator'. This adds garbage
(e.g. C;C:/java/lib.jar;C;C:/java/lib2.jar) to the classpath used by the
compiler.
oops
--- Andy Piper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On another note 21.4.6 is _old_. The current release is
21.4.11, you should probably upgrade if you can.
21.4.11? HA! That's _ancient_! Ya gots to keep up with the times. .12 was
released a few days after .11. hehe
--
Le
Hi,
This is the current indentation style:
code
gmo.options = MQC.MQGMO_WAIT |
MQC.MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING |
MQC.MQGMO_SYNCPOINT |
MQC.MQGMO_CONVERT;
/code
I would like:
code
gmo.options = MQC.MQGMO_WAIT |
MQC.MQGMO_FAIL_IF_QUIESCING |
MQC.MQGMO_SYNCPOINT |
--- Galen Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 6 Feb 2003,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Galen Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Zsh mailing list, which I'm also on is roughly set up like
this:
zsh-announce - zsh-users - zsh-developers
Messages fall through toward the right.
Hi,
The abbrevs I define from JDEE are not available when I do `edit-abbrev' or
`write-abbrev-file', I know that there is the jde-mode-abbreviations, is this
it?
--
Le
__
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
Hi,
When I use 'jde-import-find-and-import' in ECB with a compile window, the
prompt window that asks for clarification pops up in the compilation buffer.
This is fine. But then, it doesn't have an idea where to put the import
statement. Is there a setting in JDE/ECB that I can tweak to
Hi all,
I have some questions about managing imports in JDEE.
1. I see that there is a very nice `jde-import-organize' and
`jde-import-collapse-imports' functions. But what if I want to expand an
import of java.util.* to only classes that I'm using?
2. In WSAD, when I organize imports, it
--- Chitale, Sandip V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. I had written a BCEL based tool to parse a class file
and dump the imports. Nick Sieger had wrapped it in some
lisp code also.
That's pretty ingenious. But does anyone think this should be possible
without parsing a compiled class file?
Hi,
Does anyone use tags with jdee? I fail to see the point of them. And it
seems to add an extra layer of complexity, i.e. constantly updating the tags
table. Or is it that I just don't get the tags concept?
--
Le
__
Post
--- Andrew Hyatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, using tags gives you access to functionality that JDE doesn't
have. Like a quick take-me-to-class functionality. JDE has several
take-me-to-class-at-point functionality, but that's not quite the
same. Plus, JDE often makes you choose between
17 matches
Mail list logo
